Cargando…
Maxillary protraction with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask versus skeletal anchorage with mini-implants in class III patients: a non-randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The use of skeletal anchorage devices for maxillary protraction in patients with class III malocclusion due to deficiency in the middle third of the face has been shown to be a promising approach to treatment of these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment of class...
Autores principales: | de Souza, Ricardo Alves, Rino Neto, José, de Paiva, João Batista |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31475309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0288-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Maxillary protraction using customized mini-plates for anchorage in an adolescent girl with skeletal Class III malocclusion
por: Liang, Shuran, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients
por: Esenlik, Elçin, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Maxillary protraction and vertical control utilizing skeletal anchorage for midfacial-maxillary deficiency
por: MATSUMOTO, Kensuke, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Effects of the long-term use of maxillary protraction facemasks with skeletal anchorage on pharyngeal airway dimensions in growing patients with cleft lip and palate
por: Kim, Jung-Eun, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Management of skeletal Cl III malocclusion using simultaneous alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) and facemask protraction in adolescence
por: Singh, Harpreet, et al.
Publicado: (2022)