Cargando…
A systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners
BACKGROUND: The number of older prisoners has risen exponentially over the last two decades, especially in high-income countries. Due to the increased and somewhat inadequately met health and social care needs of this group of prisoners, coupled with their vulnerability arising from higher levels of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40352-019-0090-0 |
_version_ | 1783447658206068736 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Caroline Treacy, Samantha Haggith, Anna Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana Cater, Frances Kuhn, Isla Van Bortel, Tine |
author_facet | Lee, Caroline Treacy, Samantha Haggith, Anna Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana Cater, Frances Kuhn, Isla Van Bortel, Tine |
author_sort | Lee, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The number of older prisoners has risen exponentially over the last two decades, especially in high-income countries. Due to the increased and somewhat inadequately met health and social care needs of this group of prisoners, coupled with their vulnerability arising from higher levels of isolation, poverty and exploitation, financial costs have spiralled and human rights concerns have grown. This review aimed to present an overview of programmes that addressed older prisoners’ social care needs, a particularly underdeveloped area, with a view to assessing the extent to which they could inform policy and practice. METHODS: Following Whittemore and Knafl’s (J Adv Nurs 52:546-553, 2005) integrative review approach, a comprehensive search - including 16 electronic databases and hand searching - was undertaken up to May 2017 using search terms related to context, function and disability. The quality of included papers was assessed, data were extracted using a review-specific form based on the PICO formula, and research questions addressed using a narrative synthesis approach. Additionally, reporting followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 29 papers were selected for inclusion, the majority of which focused on hospice programmes, with the remainder describing personal care-focused services, structured day programmes, and adaptations to prison operations (regime) and accommodation in support of prisoners’ social care needs. Whilst the programmes were reported to have some positive impacts on prisoners and the prison overall, and programmes were perceived to be cost-effective or cost-neutral, outcomes regarding staff were more mixed. Findings were tempered by the methodological shortcomings of the included papers, with many assessed as low quality, with a lack of prisoner participation, and an absence of experimental studies. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for programmes addressing older prisoners’ social care needs appears to be at an embryonic stage. Further robust studies evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of programmes addressing older prisoners’ social care needs are imperative in better informing policy and practice in support of this highly vulnerable group. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40352-019-0090-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6717991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67179912019-09-06 A systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners Lee, Caroline Treacy, Samantha Haggith, Anna Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana Cater, Frances Kuhn, Isla Van Bortel, Tine Health Justice Research Article BACKGROUND: The number of older prisoners has risen exponentially over the last two decades, especially in high-income countries. Due to the increased and somewhat inadequately met health and social care needs of this group of prisoners, coupled with their vulnerability arising from higher levels of isolation, poverty and exploitation, financial costs have spiralled and human rights concerns have grown. This review aimed to present an overview of programmes that addressed older prisoners’ social care needs, a particularly underdeveloped area, with a view to assessing the extent to which they could inform policy and practice. METHODS: Following Whittemore and Knafl’s (J Adv Nurs 52:546-553, 2005) integrative review approach, a comprehensive search - including 16 electronic databases and hand searching - was undertaken up to May 2017 using search terms related to context, function and disability. The quality of included papers was assessed, data were extracted using a review-specific form based on the PICO formula, and research questions addressed using a narrative synthesis approach. Additionally, reporting followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 29 papers were selected for inclusion, the majority of which focused on hospice programmes, with the remainder describing personal care-focused services, structured day programmes, and adaptations to prison operations (regime) and accommodation in support of prisoners’ social care needs. Whilst the programmes were reported to have some positive impacts on prisoners and the prison overall, and programmes were perceived to be cost-effective or cost-neutral, outcomes regarding staff were more mixed. Findings were tempered by the methodological shortcomings of the included papers, with many assessed as low quality, with a lack of prisoner participation, and an absence of experimental studies. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base for programmes addressing older prisoners’ social care needs appears to be at an embryonic stage. Further robust studies evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of programmes addressing older prisoners’ social care needs are imperative in better informing policy and practice in support of this highly vulnerable group. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40352-019-0090-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6717991/ /pubmed/31134392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40352-019-0090-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Caroline Treacy, Samantha Haggith, Anna Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana Cater, Frances Kuhn, Isla Van Bortel, Tine A systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners |
title | A systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners |
title_full | A systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners |
title_fullStr | A systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners |
title_short | A systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners |
title_sort | systematic integrative review of programmes addressing the social care needs of older prisoners |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40352-019-0090-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leecaroline asystematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT treacysamantha asystematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT haggithanna asystematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT wickramasinghenuwandarshana asystematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT caterfrances asystematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT kuhnisla asystematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT vanborteltine asystematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT leecaroline systematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT treacysamantha systematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT haggithanna systematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT wickramasinghenuwandarshana systematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT caterfrances systematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT kuhnisla systematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners AT vanborteltine systematicintegrativereviewofprogrammesaddressingthesocialcareneedsofolderprisoners |