Cargando…
Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal‐free stitches
Surgical method improvements aim to optimize the patient experience. The problem of healing of the drainage tube hole has not received attention and is of concern because it can plague patient recovery. In this article we report on how we have improved the method of suturing the drainage tube hole a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31368233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13157 |
_version_ | 1783447665373085696 |
---|---|
author | Fu, Rui Zhang, Jia‐Tao Dong, Song Chen, Ying Zhang, Chao Tang, Wen‐Fang Xia, Jin Nie, Qiang Zhong, Wen‐Zhao |
author_facet | Fu, Rui Zhang, Jia‐Tao Dong, Song Chen, Ying Zhang, Chao Tang, Wen‐Fang Xia, Jin Nie, Qiang Zhong, Wen‐Zhao |
author_sort | Fu, Rui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surgical method improvements aim to optimize the patient experience. The problem of healing of the drainage tube hole has not received attention and is of concern because it can plague patient recovery. In this article we report on how we have improved the method of suturing the drainage tube hole and explore the safety and effectiveness of this method. Between December 2017 to August 2018, 102 patients underwent thoracoscopic lung resection (single port or single utility port) using different methods of suturing drainage tube holes. The intervention group received improved methods with subcuticular and intradermal suture and removal‐free stitches, whilst the control group received a conventional mattress suture and fixed chest tube. A preset line was left to tie knots and close the hole after the removal of the chest tube. The stitches were removed 7–12 days after surgery. The baseline clinical features of the patients were subsequently analyzed. The objective and subjective conditions of scars were evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at one month after surgery. The intervention group (n = 71) and control group (n = 31) had balanced baseline clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of three‐day postoperative pain and postoperative hospital stay. In the intervention group, three patients (4.23%) had wound splitting that required re‐suturing, which was better than five patients (16.13%) in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of pleural fluid outflow, wound infection, post‐removal pneumothorax, chest tube prolapse and incisional hernia were not different between the two groups. We conclude that the objective and subjective evaluation results of scars were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05), and the experimental group was superior to the control group. A balanced result between aesthetic appearance and safety as regards video‐assisted thoracic surgery can be achieved through the chest tube hole improved suture method. This method also improves the patient's recovery experience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6718023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67180232019-09-06 Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal‐free stitches Fu, Rui Zhang, Jia‐Tao Dong, Song Chen, Ying Zhang, Chao Tang, Wen‐Fang Xia, Jin Nie, Qiang Zhong, Wen‐Zhao Thorac Cancer Brief Report Surgical method improvements aim to optimize the patient experience. The problem of healing of the drainage tube hole has not received attention and is of concern because it can plague patient recovery. In this article we report on how we have improved the method of suturing the drainage tube hole and explore the safety and effectiveness of this method. Between December 2017 to August 2018, 102 patients underwent thoracoscopic lung resection (single port or single utility port) using different methods of suturing drainage tube holes. The intervention group received improved methods with subcuticular and intradermal suture and removal‐free stitches, whilst the control group received a conventional mattress suture and fixed chest tube. A preset line was left to tie knots and close the hole after the removal of the chest tube. The stitches were removed 7–12 days after surgery. The baseline clinical features of the patients were subsequently analyzed. The objective and subjective conditions of scars were evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at one month after surgery. The intervention group (n = 71) and control group (n = 31) had balanced baseline clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of three‐day postoperative pain and postoperative hospital stay. In the intervention group, three patients (4.23%) had wound splitting that required re‐suturing, which was better than five patients (16.13%) in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of pleural fluid outflow, wound infection, post‐removal pneumothorax, chest tube prolapse and incisional hernia were not different between the two groups. We conclude that the objective and subjective evaluation results of scars were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05), and the experimental group was superior to the control group. A balanced result between aesthetic appearance and safety as regards video‐assisted thoracic surgery can be achieved through the chest tube hole improved suture method. This method also improves the patient's recovery experience. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-07-31 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6718023/ /pubmed/31368233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13157 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Fu, Rui Zhang, Jia‐Tao Dong, Song Chen, Ying Zhang, Chao Tang, Wen‐Fang Xia, Jin Nie, Qiang Zhong, Wen‐Zhao Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal‐free stitches |
title | Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal‐free stitches |
title_full | Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal‐free stitches |
title_fullStr | Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal‐free stitches |
title_full_unstemmed | Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal‐free stitches |
title_short | Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal‐free stitches |
title_sort | drainage tube hole suture improvement: removal‐free stitches |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31368233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furui drainagetubeholesutureimprovementremovalfreestitches AT zhangjiatao drainagetubeholesutureimprovementremovalfreestitches AT dongsong drainagetubeholesutureimprovementremovalfreestitches AT chenying drainagetubeholesutureimprovementremovalfreestitches AT zhangchao drainagetubeholesutureimprovementremovalfreestitches AT tangwenfang drainagetubeholesutureimprovementremovalfreestitches AT xiajin drainagetubeholesutureimprovementremovalfreestitches AT nieqiang drainagetubeholesutureimprovementremovalfreestitches AT zhongwenzhao drainagetubeholesutureimprovementremovalfreestitches |