Cargando…

Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes

Background and purpose — Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty is sometimes required. Varying revision rates and outcomes have been reported in rather small patient series. Data on risk factors for revision surgery, on the final outcome of revision, and possible factors affecting th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mattila, Simo, Waris, Eero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1599253
_version_ 1783447694390329344
author Mattila, Simo
Waris, Eero
author_facet Mattila, Simo
Waris, Eero
author_sort Mattila, Simo
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty is sometimes required. Varying revision rates and outcomes have been reported in rather small patient series. Data on risk factors for revision surgery, on the final outcome of revision, and possible factors affecting the outcome of revision are also limited. We evaluated these factors in 50 patients. Patients and methods — From 1,142 trapeziometacarpal arthroplasties performed during a 10-year period, 50 patients with 65 revision surgeries were retrospectively identified and invited to participate in a follow-up study involving subjective, objective, and radiologic evaluation. The revision rate, risk factors for revision, and factors affecting the outcome of revision were analyzed. Results — The revision rate was 5%. Scaphometacarpal impingement was the most common reason for revision surgery. Patient age ≤ 55 years was a risk factor with a revision rate of 9% in this age group, whereas an operation on both thumbs during the follow-up period was a negative risk factor for revision surgery. There was no difference in revision risk between ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition with or without a bone tunnel. 9 patients had multiple revision procedures and their final outcome did not differ significantly from patients revised only once. Most of the patients felt subjectively that they had benefited from revision surgery and the subjective outcome measures (QuickDash and pain VAS) and the Conolly score were in the same range as previously described for revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. Interpretation — Age ≤ 55 years is a risk factor for revision surgery. The type of primary surgery does not affect the risk of revision surgery and multiple revision procedures do not result in worse outcomes than cases revised only once. Mechanical pain caused by contact between the metacarpal and scaphoid is the most common indication for revision surgery. In general, patients seem to benefit from revision surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6718170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67181702019-09-06 Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes Mattila, Simo Waris, Eero Acta Orthop Article Background and purpose — Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty is sometimes required. Varying revision rates and outcomes have been reported in rather small patient series. Data on risk factors for revision surgery, on the final outcome of revision, and possible factors affecting the outcome of revision are also limited. We evaluated these factors in 50 patients. Patients and methods — From 1,142 trapeziometacarpal arthroplasties performed during a 10-year period, 50 patients with 65 revision surgeries were retrospectively identified and invited to participate in a follow-up study involving subjective, objective, and radiologic evaluation. The revision rate, risk factors for revision, and factors affecting the outcome of revision were analyzed. Results — The revision rate was 5%. Scaphometacarpal impingement was the most common reason for revision surgery. Patient age ≤ 55 years was a risk factor with a revision rate of 9% in this age group, whereas an operation on both thumbs during the follow-up period was a negative risk factor for revision surgery. There was no difference in revision risk between ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition with or without a bone tunnel. 9 patients had multiple revision procedures and their final outcome did not differ significantly from patients revised only once. Most of the patients felt subjectively that they had benefited from revision surgery and the subjective outcome measures (QuickDash and pain VAS) and the Conolly score were in the same range as previously described for revision trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. Interpretation — Age ≤ 55 years is a risk factor for revision surgery. The type of primary surgery does not affect the risk of revision surgery and multiple revision procedures do not result in worse outcomes than cases revised only once. Mechanical pain caused by contact between the metacarpal and scaphoid is the most common indication for revision surgery. In general, patients seem to benefit from revision surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Taylor & Francis 2019-08 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6718170/ /pubmed/30931687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1599253 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Mattila, Simo
Waris, Eero
Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_full Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_fullStr Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_short Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
title_sort revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1599253
work_keys_str_mv AT mattilasimo revisionoftrapeziometacarpalarthroplastyriskfactorsproceduresandoutcomes
AT wariseero revisionoftrapeziometacarpalarthroplastyriskfactorsproceduresandoutcomes