Cargando…

Optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) group

Background and purpose — The recommended optimal duration of the thromboprophylaxis treatment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients has been a matter of debate for years. We examined the association between short (1–5 days), standard (6–14 days), and extended (≥ 15 days) duration of thromboprophy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedersen, Alma B, Andersen, Ina Trolle, Overgaard, Soren, Fenstad, Anne Marie, Lie, Stein Atle, Gjertsen, Jan-Erik, Furnes, Ove
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1611215
_version_ 1783447695798566912
author Pedersen, Alma B
Andersen, Ina Trolle
Overgaard, Soren
Fenstad, Anne Marie
Lie, Stein Atle
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Furnes, Ove
author_facet Pedersen, Alma B
Andersen, Ina Trolle
Overgaard, Soren
Fenstad, Anne Marie
Lie, Stein Atle
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Furnes, Ove
author_sort Pedersen, Alma B
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — The recommended optimal duration of the thromboprophylaxis treatment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients has been a matter of debate for years. We examined the association between short (1–5 days), standard (6–14 days), and extended (≥ 15 days) duration of thromboprophylaxis, with regards to the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and death in unselected THA patients. Patients and methods — We performed a cohort study using prospectively collected data from the population-based hip arthroplasty registries, prescription databases, and patient administrative registries in Denmark and Norway. We included 55,540 primary THA patients with osteoarthritis Results — The 90-day cumulative incidence of VTE was 1.0% for patients with standard treatment (reference), 1.1% for those with short-term treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] of 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8–1.5) and 1.0% for those with extended treatment (aHR of 0.9, CI 0.8–1.2). The aHRs for major bleeding were 1.1 (CI 0.8–1.6) for short and 0.8 (CI 0.6–1.1) for extended vs. standard treatment. In addition, patients with short and extended treatment had aHRs for death of 1.2 (CI 0.8–1.8) and 0.8 (CI 0.5–1.1) vs. standard treatment, respectively. Patients who started short treatment postoperatively had an aHR for death of 1.8 (CI 1.1–3.1) and absolute risk difference of 0.2%, whereas patients who started short treatment preoperatively had an aHR for death of 0.5 (CI 0.2–1.2) and absolute risk difference of 0.3% compared with patients who had standard treatment with post- and preoperative start, respectively. Interpretation — In routine clinical practice, we observed no overall clinically relevant difference in the risks of VTE and major bleeding within 90 days of THA with respect to thromboprophylaxis duration. However, our data indicate that short-term thromboprophylaxis started postoperatively is associated with increased 90-day mortality. The significance of these data should be explored further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6718178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67181782019-09-06 Optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) group Pedersen, Alma B Andersen, Ina Trolle Overgaard, Soren Fenstad, Anne Marie Lie, Stein Atle Gjertsen, Jan-Erik Furnes, Ove Acta Orthop Article Background and purpose — The recommended optimal duration of the thromboprophylaxis treatment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients has been a matter of debate for years. We examined the association between short (1–5 days), standard (6–14 days), and extended (≥ 15 days) duration of thromboprophylaxis, with regards to the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and death in unselected THA patients. Patients and methods — We performed a cohort study using prospectively collected data from the population-based hip arthroplasty registries, prescription databases, and patient administrative registries in Denmark and Norway. We included 55,540 primary THA patients with osteoarthritis Results — The 90-day cumulative incidence of VTE was 1.0% for patients with standard treatment (reference), 1.1% for those with short-term treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] of 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8–1.5) and 1.0% for those with extended treatment (aHR of 0.9, CI 0.8–1.2). The aHRs for major bleeding were 1.1 (CI 0.8–1.6) for short and 0.8 (CI 0.6–1.1) for extended vs. standard treatment. In addition, patients with short and extended treatment had aHRs for death of 1.2 (CI 0.8–1.8) and 0.8 (CI 0.5–1.1) vs. standard treatment, respectively. Patients who started short treatment postoperatively had an aHR for death of 1.8 (CI 1.1–3.1) and absolute risk difference of 0.2%, whereas patients who started short treatment preoperatively had an aHR for death of 0.5 (CI 0.2–1.2) and absolute risk difference of 0.3% compared with patients who had standard treatment with post- and preoperative start, respectively. Interpretation — In routine clinical practice, we observed no overall clinically relevant difference in the risks of VTE and major bleeding within 90 days of THA with respect to thromboprophylaxis duration. However, our data indicate that short-term thromboprophylaxis started postoperatively is associated with increased 90-day mortality. The significance of these data should be explored further. Taylor & Francis 2019-08 2019-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6718178/ /pubmed/31060431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1611215 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Pedersen, Alma B
Andersen, Ina Trolle
Overgaard, Soren
Fenstad, Anne Marie
Lie, Stein Atle
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Furnes, Ove
Optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) group
title Optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) group
title_full Optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) group
title_fullStr Optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) group
title_full_unstemmed Optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) group
title_short Optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) group
title_sort optimal duration of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: new evidence in 55,540 patients with osteoarthritis from the nordic arthroplasty register association (nara) group
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1611215
work_keys_str_mv AT pedersenalmab optimaldurationofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisintotalhiparthroplastynewevidencein55540patientswithosteoarthritisfromthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaragroup
AT anderseninatrolle optimaldurationofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisintotalhiparthroplastynewevidencein55540patientswithosteoarthritisfromthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaragroup
AT overgaardsoren optimaldurationofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisintotalhiparthroplastynewevidencein55540patientswithosteoarthritisfromthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaragroup
AT fenstadannemarie optimaldurationofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisintotalhiparthroplastynewevidencein55540patientswithosteoarthritisfromthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaragroup
AT liesteinatle optimaldurationofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisintotalhiparthroplastynewevidencein55540patientswithosteoarthritisfromthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaragroup
AT gjertsenjanerik optimaldurationofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisintotalhiparthroplastynewevidencein55540patientswithosteoarthritisfromthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaragroup
AT furnesove optimaldurationofanticoagulantthromboprophylaxisintotalhiparthroplastynewevidencein55540patientswithosteoarthritisfromthenordicarthroplastyregisterassociationnaragroup