Cargando…
Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens, J&J Vision Tecnis Symfony(®) ZXR00 (Group A) and bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens, Alcon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695317 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S202895 |
_version_ | 1783447701171470336 |
---|---|
author | de Medeiros, André Lins Jones Saraiva, Flavio Iguma, Camila Ishii Kniggendorf, Danilo Varela Alves, Guilherme Chaves, Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Vilar, Cesar Motta, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Carricondo, Pedro Carlos Takashi Nakano, Celso Nosé, Walton Hida, Wilson Takashi |
author_facet | de Medeiros, André Lins Jones Saraiva, Flavio Iguma, Camila Ishii Kniggendorf, Danilo Varela Alves, Guilherme Chaves, Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Vilar, Cesar Motta, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Carricondo, Pedro Carlos Takashi Nakano, Celso Nosé, Walton Hida, Wilson Takashi |
author_sort | de Medeiros, André Lins |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens, J&J Vision Tecnis Symfony(®) ZXR00 (Group A) and bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens, Alcon Acrysof IQ PanOptix(®) TNFT00 (Group B). METHODS: This prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of consecutive cases assessed 52 eyes of 26 patients operated on by the same surgeon (WTH) and binocularly implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses between May 2016 and July 2018. Binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate and near was tested in all cases. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 70 cm, monocular visual defocus curve and the quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 ( NEI-VFQ 25). RESULTS: Postoperative UDVA was 0.00 and 0.09 logMAR (P<0.001), UIVA was 0.20 and 0.39 logMAR (P<0.001) and UNVA was 0.16 and −0.01 logMAR (P<0.001) in groups A and B, respectively; postoperative CDVA was −0.05 and 0.06 logMAR (P<0.001) in groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both groups reported good subjective quality of vision regarding long, intermediate and short distances. Group A had a better performance for binocular UDVA, UIVA at 70 cm and CDVA, while regarding the monocular defocus curve, Group A outperformed Group B for long distances. Furthermore, Group B surpassed it in the short to very short distances, between the range of ≥2.00 D to 5.00 D of vergence. While Group A had a better performance regarding the vergences between 0.00 and 1.00 D (P<0.05) and at the vergence of +2.50 D (P=0.007). Group B outran Group A for UNVA at 40 cm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6718244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67182442019-11-06 Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics de Medeiros, André Lins Jones Saraiva, Flavio Iguma, Camila Ishii Kniggendorf, Danilo Varela Alves, Guilherme Chaves, Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Vilar, Cesar Motta, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Carricondo, Pedro Carlos Takashi Nakano, Celso Nosé, Walton Hida, Wilson Takashi Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the visual outcomes and subjective visual quality between bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens, J&J Vision Tecnis Symfony(®) ZXR00 (Group A) and bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens, Alcon Acrysof IQ PanOptix(®) TNFT00 (Group B). METHODS: This prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of consecutive cases assessed 52 eyes of 26 patients operated on by the same surgeon (WTH) and binocularly implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses between May 2016 and July 2018. Binocular visual acuity for far, intermediate and near was tested in all cases. Ophthalmological evaluation included the measurement of binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 70 cm, monocular visual defocus curve and the quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 ( NEI-VFQ 25). RESULTS: Postoperative UDVA was 0.00 and 0.09 logMAR (P<0.001), UIVA was 0.20 and 0.39 logMAR (P<0.001) and UNVA was 0.16 and −0.01 logMAR (P<0.001) in groups A and B, respectively; postoperative CDVA was −0.05 and 0.06 logMAR (P<0.001) in groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both groups reported good subjective quality of vision regarding long, intermediate and short distances. Group A had a better performance for binocular UDVA, UIVA at 70 cm and CDVA, while regarding the monocular defocus curve, Group A outperformed Group B for long distances. Furthermore, Group B surpassed it in the short to very short distances, between the range of ≥2.00 D to 5.00 D of vergence. While Group A had a better performance regarding the vergences between 0.00 and 1.00 D (P<0.05) and at the vergence of +2.50 D (P=0.007). Group B outran Group A for UNVA at 40 cm. Dove 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6718244/ /pubmed/31695317 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S202895 Text en © 2019 de Medeiros et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research de Medeiros, André Lins Jones Saraiva, Flavio Iguma, Camila Ishii Kniggendorf, Danilo Varela Alves, Guilherme Chaves, Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Vilar, Cesar Motta, Antonio Francisco Pimenta Carricondo, Pedro Carlos Takashi Nakano, Celso Nosé, Walton Hida, Wilson Takashi Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics |
title | Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics |
title_full | Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics |
title_fullStr | Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics |
title_short | Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics |
title_sort | comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695317 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S202895 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demedeirosandrelins comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT jonessaraivaflavio comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT igumacamilaishii comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT kniggendorfdanilovarela comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT alvesguilherme comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT chavesmarioaugustopereiradias comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT vilarcesar comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT mottaantoniofranciscopimenta comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT carricondopedrocarlos comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT takashinakanocelso comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT nosewalton comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics AT hidawilsontakashi comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterbilateralimplantationoftwointraocularlenseswithdistinctdiffractiveoptics |