Cargando…

SaO(2) as a predictor of exercise-induced hypoxemia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at moderate altitude

BACKGROUND: Given the high prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Bogota (2630 m above the sea), screening methods are required for COPD patients who develop exercise-induced hypoxemia (EIH). OBJECTIVE: The objective was to measure the productive capacity of basal oxygen satur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acero Colmenares, Rafael, Lombo Moreno, Carlos Ernesto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6718247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695353
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S207467
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Given the high prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Bogota (2630 m above the sea), screening methods are required for COPD patients who develop exercise-induced hypoxemia (EIH). OBJECTIVE: The objective was to measure the productive capacity of basal oxygen saturation for the detection of EIH during the 6-min walking test (6MWT) in patients diagnosed with COPD in a hospital in Bogotá. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. POPULATION: Patients diagnosed with COPD with SaO(2)≥88% who attended the Pneumology Section of the FSFB for a 6MWT between 2013 and 2017 were included in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Age, sex, anthropometric data, SaO(2), SaO(2) during 6MWT, and spirometry were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients with EIH and 32 patients without EIH were studied. Statistically significant differences were found in SaO(2), minimum SaO(2) during 6MWT, and BMI (90.8% vs 93%, 80.3% vs 88.9%, and 26.7 kg/m(2) vs 23.8 kg/m(2), respectively). FEV1 was without statistically significant differences (74.1% vs 78.6%). The ROC curve showed a better cut-off point for detecting EIH with basal SaO(2)≤92% (sensitivity 76.1%, specificity 62.5%, NPV 47.6%, and PPV 85.4%) and SaO(2)≤94% as the best sensitivity point (sensitivity 94.6%, specificity 15.6%, NPV 76.3%, and PPV 50%). CONCLUSION: SaO(2) is not a good screening test for EIH in COPD patients at moderate altitude.