Cargando…

Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect(TM)

Rehabilitation and mobility training of post-stroke patients is crucial for their functional recovery. While traditional methods can still help patients, new rehabilitation and mobility training methods are necessary to facilitate better recovery at lower costs. In this work, our objective was to de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orand, Abbas, Erdal Aksoy, Eren, Miyasaka, Hiroyuki, Weeks Levy, Carolyn, Zhang, Xin, Menon, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31398957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19163474
_version_ 1783447862458187776
author Orand, Abbas
Erdal Aksoy, Eren
Miyasaka, Hiroyuki
Weeks Levy, Carolyn
Zhang, Xin
Menon, Carlo
author_facet Orand, Abbas
Erdal Aksoy, Eren
Miyasaka, Hiroyuki
Weeks Levy, Carolyn
Zhang, Xin
Menon, Carlo
author_sort Orand, Abbas
collection PubMed
description Rehabilitation and mobility training of post-stroke patients is crucial for their functional recovery. While traditional methods can still help patients, new rehabilitation and mobility training methods are necessary to facilitate better recovery at lower costs. In this work, our objective was to design and develop a rehabilitation training system targeting the functional recovery of post-stroke users with high efficiency. To accomplish this goal, we applied a bilateral training method, which proved to be effective in enhancing motor recovery using tactile feedback for the training. One participant with hemiparesis underwent six weeks of training. Two protocols, “contralateral arm matching” and “both arms moving together”, were carried out by the participant. Each of the protocols consisted of “shoulder abduction” and “shoulder flexion” at angles close to 30 and 60 degrees. The participant carried out 15 repetitions at each angle for each task. For example, in the “contralateral arm matching” protocol, the unaffected arm of the participant was set to an angle close to 30 degrees. He was then requested to keep the unaffected arm at the specified angle while trying to match the position with the affected arm. Whenever the two arms matched, a vibration was given on both brachialis muscles. For the “both arms moving together” protocol, the two arms were first set approximately to an angle of either 30 or 60 degrees. The participant was asked to return both arms to a relaxed position before moving both arms back to the remembered specified angle. The arm that was slower in moving to the specified angle received a vibration. We performed clinical assessments before, midway through, and after the training period using a Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), a Wolf motor function test (WMFT), and a proprioceptive assessment. For the assessments, two ipsilateral and contralateral arm matching tasks, each consisting of three movements (shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion, and elbow flexion), were used. Movements were performed at two angles, 30 and 60 degrees. For both tasks, the same procedure was used. For example, in the case of the ipsilateral arm matching task, an experimenter positioned the affected arm of the participant at 30 degrees of shoulder abduction. The participant was requested to keep the arm in that position for ~5 s before returning to a relaxed initial position. Then, after another ~5-s delay, the participant moved the affected arm back to the remembered position. An experimenter measured this shoulder abduction angle manually using a goniometer. The same procedure was repeated for the 60 degree angle and for the other two movements. We applied a low-cost Kinect to extract the participant’s body joint position data. Tactile feedback was given based on the arm position detected by the Kinect sensor. By using a Kinect sensor, we demonstrated the feasibility of the system for the training of a post-stroke user. The proposed system can further be employed for self-training of patients at home. The results of the FMA, WMFT, and goniometer angle measurements showed improvements in several tasks, suggesting a positive effect of the training system and its feasibility for further application for stroke survivors’ rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6719092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67190922019-09-10 Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect(TM) Orand, Abbas Erdal Aksoy, Eren Miyasaka, Hiroyuki Weeks Levy, Carolyn Zhang, Xin Menon, Carlo Sensors (Basel) Article Rehabilitation and mobility training of post-stroke patients is crucial for their functional recovery. While traditional methods can still help patients, new rehabilitation and mobility training methods are necessary to facilitate better recovery at lower costs. In this work, our objective was to design and develop a rehabilitation training system targeting the functional recovery of post-stroke users with high efficiency. To accomplish this goal, we applied a bilateral training method, which proved to be effective in enhancing motor recovery using tactile feedback for the training. One participant with hemiparesis underwent six weeks of training. Two protocols, “contralateral arm matching” and “both arms moving together”, were carried out by the participant. Each of the protocols consisted of “shoulder abduction” and “shoulder flexion” at angles close to 30 and 60 degrees. The participant carried out 15 repetitions at each angle for each task. For example, in the “contralateral arm matching” protocol, the unaffected arm of the participant was set to an angle close to 30 degrees. He was then requested to keep the unaffected arm at the specified angle while trying to match the position with the affected arm. Whenever the two arms matched, a vibration was given on both brachialis muscles. For the “both arms moving together” protocol, the two arms were first set approximately to an angle of either 30 or 60 degrees. The participant was asked to return both arms to a relaxed position before moving both arms back to the remembered specified angle. The arm that was slower in moving to the specified angle received a vibration. We performed clinical assessments before, midway through, and after the training period using a Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), a Wolf motor function test (WMFT), and a proprioceptive assessment. For the assessments, two ipsilateral and contralateral arm matching tasks, each consisting of three movements (shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion, and elbow flexion), were used. Movements were performed at two angles, 30 and 60 degrees. For both tasks, the same procedure was used. For example, in the case of the ipsilateral arm matching task, an experimenter positioned the affected arm of the participant at 30 degrees of shoulder abduction. The participant was requested to keep the arm in that position for ~5 s before returning to a relaxed initial position. Then, after another ~5-s delay, the participant moved the affected arm back to the remembered position. An experimenter measured this shoulder abduction angle manually using a goniometer. The same procedure was repeated for the 60 degree angle and for the other two movements. We applied a low-cost Kinect to extract the participant’s body joint position data. Tactile feedback was given based on the arm position detected by the Kinect sensor. By using a Kinect sensor, we demonstrated the feasibility of the system for the training of a post-stroke user. The proposed system can further be employed for self-training of patients at home. The results of the FMA, WMFT, and goniometer angle measurements showed improvements in several tasks, suggesting a positive effect of the training system and its feasibility for further application for stroke survivors’ rehabilitation. MDPI 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6719092/ /pubmed/31398957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19163474 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Orand, Abbas
Erdal Aksoy, Eren
Miyasaka, Hiroyuki
Weeks Levy, Carolyn
Zhang, Xin
Menon, Carlo
Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect(TM)
title Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect(TM)
title_full Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect(TM)
title_fullStr Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect(TM)
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect(TM)
title_short Bilateral Tactile Feedback-Enabled Training for Stroke Survivors Using Microsoft Kinect(TM)
title_sort bilateral tactile feedback-enabled training for stroke survivors using microsoft kinect(tm)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31398957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19163474
work_keys_str_mv AT orandabbas bilateraltactilefeedbackenabledtrainingforstrokesurvivorsusingmicrosoftkinecttm
AT erdalaksoyeren bilateraltactilefeedbackenabledtrainingforstrokesurvivorsusingmicrosoftkinecttm
AT miyasakahiroyuki bilateraltactilefeedbackenabledtrainingforstrokesurvivorsusingmicrosoftkinecttm
AT weekslevycarolyn bilateraltactilefeedbackenabledtrainingforstrokesurvivorsusingmicrosoftkinecttm
AT zhangxin bilateraltactilefeedbackenabledtrainingforstrokesurvivorsusingmicrosoftkinecttm
AT menoncarlo bilateraltactilefeedbackenabledtrainingforstrokesurvivorsusingmicrosoftkinecttm