Cargando…

Closing the Wearable Gap—Part II: Sensor Orientation and Placement for Foot and Ankle Joint Kinematic Measurements

The linearity of soft robotic sensors (SRS) was recently validated for movement angle assessment using a rigid body structure that accurately depicted critical movements of the foot–ankle complex. The purpose of this study was to continue the validation of SRS for joint angle movement capture on 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saucier, David, Luczak, Tony, Nguyen, Phuoc, Davarzani, Samaneh, Peranich, Preston, Ball, John E., Burch, Reuben F., Smith, Brian K., Chander, Harish, Knight, Adam, Prabhu, R. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31405180
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19163509
_version_ 1783447875750985728
author Saucier, David
Luczak, Tony
Nguyen, Phuoc
Davarzani, Samaneh
Peranich, Preston
Ball, John E.
Burch, Reuben F.
Smith, Brian K.
Chander, Harish
Knight, Adam
Prabhu, R. K.
author_facet Saucier, David
Luczak, Tony
Nguyen, Phuoc
Davarzani, Samaneh
Peranich, Preston
Ball, John E.
Burch, Reuben F.
Smith, Brian K.
Chander, Harish
Knight, Adam
Prabhu, R. K.
author_sort Saucier, David
collection PubMed
description The linearity of soft robotic sensors (SRS) was recently validated for movement angle assessment using a rigid body structure that accurately depicted critical movements of the foot–ankle complex. The purpose of this study was to continue the validation of SRS for joint angle movement capture on 10 participants (five male and five female) performing ankle movements in a non-weight bearing, high-seated, sitting position. The four basic ankle movements—plantar flexion (PF), dorsiflexion (DF), inversion (INV), and eversion (EVR)—were assessed individually in order to select good placement and orientation configurations (POCs) for four SRS positioned to capture each movement type. PF, INV, and EVR each had three POCs identified based on bony landmarks of the foot and ankle while the DF location was only tested for one POC. Each participant wore a specialized compression sock where the SRS could be consistently tested from all POCs for each participant. The movement data collected from each sensor was then compared against 3D motion capture data. R-squared and root-mean-squared error averages were used to assess relative and absolute measures of fit to motion capture output. Participant robustness, opposing movements, and gender were also used to identify good SRS POC placement for foot–ankle movement capture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6719149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67191492019-09-10 Closing the Wearable Gap—Part II: Sensor Orientation and Placement for Foot and Ankle Joint Kinematic Measurements Saucier, David Luczak, Tony Nguyen, Phuoc Davarzani, Samaneh Peranich, Preston Ball, John E. Burch, Reuben F. Smith, Brian K. Chander, Harish Knight, Adam Prabhu, R. K. Sensors (Basel) Article The linearity of soft robotic sensors (SRS) was recently validated for movement angle assessment using a rigid body structure that accurately depicted critical movements of the foot–ankle complex. The purpose of this study was to continue the validation of SRS for joint angle movement capture on 10 participants (five male and five female) performing ankle movements in a non-weight bearing, high-seated, sitting position. The four basic ankle movements—plantar flexion (PF), dorsiflexion (DF), inversion (INV), and eversion (EVR)—were assessed individually in order to select good placement and orientation configurations (POCs) for four SRS positioned to capture each movement type. PF, INV, and EVR each had three POCs identified based on bony landmarks of the foot and ankle while the DF location was only tested for one POC. Each participant wore a specialized compression sock where the SRS could be consistently tested from all POCs for each participant. The movement data collected from each sensor was then compared against 3D motion capture data. R-squared and root-mean-squared error averages were used to assess relative and absolute measures of fit to motion capture output. Participant robustness, opposing movements, and gender were also used to identify good SRS POC placement for foot–ankle movement capture. MDPI 2019-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6719149/ /pubmed/31405180 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19163509 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Saucier, David
Luczak, Tony
Nguyen, Phuoc
Davarzani, Samaneh
Peranich, Preston
Ball, John E.
Burch, Reuben F.
Smith, Brian K.
Chander, Harish
Knight, Adam
Prabhu, R. K.
Closing the Wearable Gap—Part II: Sensor Orientation and Placement for Foot and Ankle Joint Kinematic Measurements
title Closing the Wearable Gap—Part II: Sensor Orientation and Placement for Foot and Ankle Joint Kinematic Measurements
title_full Closing the Wearable Gap—Part II: Sensor Orientation and Placement for Foot and Ankle Joint Kinematic Measurements
title_fullStr Closing the Wearable Gap—Part II: Sensor Orientation and Placement for Foot and Ankle Joint Kinematic Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Closing the Wearable Gap—Part II: Sensor Orientation and Placement for Foot and Ankle Joint Kinematic Measurements
title_short Closing the Wearable Gap—Part II: Sensor Orientation and Placement for Foot and Ankle Joint Kinematic Measurements
title_sort closing the wearable gap—part ii: sensor orientation and placement for foot and ankle joint kinematic measurements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31405180
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19163509
work_keys_str_mv AT saucierdavid closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT luczaktony closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT nguyenphuoc closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT davarzanisamaneh closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT peranichpreston closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT balljohne closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT burchreubenf closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT smithbriank closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT chanderharish closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT knightadam closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements
AT prabhurk closingthewearablegappartiisensororientationandplacementforfootandanklejointkinematicmeasurements