Cargando…
Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective
AIM: The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers. BACKGROUND: Despite the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000409 |
_version_ | 1783447899306196992 |
---|---|
author | Donnelly, Catherine Ashcroft, Rachelle Mofina, Amanda Bobbette, Nicole Mulder, Carol |
author_facet | Donnelly, Catherine Ashcroft, Rachelle Mofina, Amanda Bobbette, Nicole Mulder, Carol |
author_sort | Donnelly, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers. BACKGROUND: Despite the surge of interprofessional primary health care models implemented across Canada, there is little evidence as to whether or not the intended outcomes of primary health care teams have been achieved. Part of the challenge is determining the most appropriate measures that can demonstrate the value of collaborative care. To date, little remains known about performance measurement from the providers contributing to the collaborative care process in interprofessional primary care teams. Having providers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds assist in the development of performance measures can help identify measures most relevant to demonstrate the value of collaborative care on the intended outcomes of interprofessional primary care models. METHODS: A qualitative study; part of a larger mixed methods developmental evaluation to examine performance measurement in interprofessional primary health care teams. A stakeholder workshop was conducted at an annual association meeting of interprofessional primary health care teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. Six questions guided the workshop groups and participant responses were documented on worksheets and flip charts. All responses were collected and entered verbatim into a word document. Qualitative analytic strategies were applied to each question. FINDINGS: A total of 283 primary health care providers from 14 health professions working in interprofessional primary health care teams participated. Top three elements of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 628) were communication (n = 146), co-treatment (n = 112) and patient-based conferences (n = 81). Top three performance indicators currently used to demonstrate the value of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 241) were patient experience (n = 71), patient health status (n = 35) and within team referrals (n = 30). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6719251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67192512019-09-12 Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective Donnelly, Catherine Ashcroft, Rachelle Mofina, Amanda Bobbette, Nicole Mulder, Carol Prim Health Care Res Dev Research AIM: The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers. BACKGROUND: Despite the surge of interprofessional primary health care models implemented across Canada, there is little evidence as to whether or not the intended outcomes of primary health care teams have been achieved. Part of the challenge is determining the most appropriate measures that can demonstrate the value of collaborative care. To date, little remains known about performance measurement from the providers contributing to the collaborative care process in interprofessional primary care teams. Having providers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds assist in the development of performance measures can help identify measures most relevant to demonstrate the value of collaborative care on the intended outcomes of interprofessional primary care models. METHODS: A qualitative study; part of a larger mixed methods developmental evaluation to examine performance measurement in interprofessional primary health care teams. A stakeholder workshop was conducted at an annual association meeting of interprofessional primary health care teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. Six questions guided the workshop groups and participant responses were documented on worksheets and flip charts. All responses were collected and entered verbatim into a word document. Qualitative analytic strategies were applied to each question. FINDINGS: A total of 283 primary health care providers from 14 health professions working in interprofessional primary health care teams participated. Top three elements of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 628) were communication (n = 146), co-treatment (n = 112) and patient-based conferences (n = 81). Top three performance indicators currently used to demonstrate the value of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 241) were patient experience (n = 71), patient health status (n = 35) and within team referrals (n = 30). Cambridge University Press 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6719251/ /pubmed/31455458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000409 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Donnelly, Catherine Ashcroft, Rachelle Mofina, Amanda Bobbette, Nicole Mulder, Carol Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective |
title | Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective |
title_full | Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective |
title_fullStr | Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective |
title_short | Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective |
title_sort | measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donnellycatherine measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective AT ashcroftrachelle measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective AT mofinaamanda measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective AT bobbettenicole measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective AT muldercarol measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective |