Cargando…

Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective

AIM: The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers. BACKGROUND: Despite the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donnelly, Catherine, Ashcroft, Rachelle, Mofina, Amanda, Bobbette, Nicole, Mulder, Carol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000409
_version_ 1783447899306196992
author Donnelly, Catherine
Ashcroft, Rachelle
Mofina, Amanda
Bobbette, Nicole
Mulder, Carol
author_facet Donnelly, Catherine
Ashcroft, Rachelle
Mofina, Amanda
Bobbette, Nicole
Mulder, Carol
author_sort Donnelly, Catherine
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers. BACKGROUND: Despite the surge of interprofessional primary health care models implemented across Canada, there is little evidence as to whether or not the intended outcomes of primary health care teams have been achieved. Part of the challenge is determining the most appropriate measures that can demonstrate the value of collaborative care. To date, little remains known about performance measurement from the providers contributing to the collaborative care process in interprofessional primary care teams. Having providers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds assist in the development of performance measures can help identify measures most relevant to demonstrate the value of collaborative care on the intended outcomes of interprofessional primary care models. METHODS: A qualitative study; part of a larger mixed methods developmental evaluation to examine performance measurement in interprofessional primary health care teams. A stakeholder workshop was conducted at an annual association meeting of interprofessional primary health care teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. Six questions guided the workshop groups and participant responses were documented on worksheets and flip charts. All responses were collected and entered verbatim into a word document. Qualitative analytic strategies were applied to each question. FINDINGS: A total of 283 primary health care providers from 14 health professions working in interprofessional primary health care teams participated. Top three elements of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 628) were communication (n = 146), co-treatment (n = 112) and patient-based conferences (n = 81). Top three performance indicators currently used to demonstrate the value of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 241) were patient experience (n = 71), patient health status (n = 35) and within team referrals (n = 30).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6719251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67192512019-09-12 Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective Donnelly, Catherine Ashcroft, Rachelle Mofina, Amanda Bobbette, Nicole Mulder, Carol Prim Health Care Res Dev Research AIM: The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers. BACKGROUND: Despite the surge of interprofessional primary health care models implemented across Canada, there is little evidence as to whether or not the intended outcomes of primary health care teams have been achieved. Part of the challenge is determining the most appropriate measures that can demonstrate the value of collaborative care. To date, little remains known about performance measurement from the providers contributing to the collaborative care process in interprofessional primary care teams. Having providers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds assist in the development of performance measures can help identify measures most relevant to demonstrate the value of collaborative care on the intended outcomes of interprofessional primary care models. METHODS: A qualitative study; part of a larger mixed methods developmental evaluation to examine performance measurement in interprofessional primary health care teams. A stakeholder workshop was conducted at an annual association meeting of interprofessional primary health care teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. Six questions guided the workshop groups and participant responses were documented on worksheets and flip charts. All responses were collected and entered verbatim into a word document. Qualitative analytic strategies were applied to each question. FINDINGS: A total of 283 primary health care providers from 14 health professions working in interprofessional primary health care teams participated. Top three elements of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 628) were communication (n = 146), co-treatment (n = 112) and patient-based conferences (n = 81). Top three performance indicators currently used to demonstrate the value of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 241) were patient experience (n = 71), patient health status (n = 35) and within team referrals (n = 30). Cambridge University Press 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6719251/ /pubmed/31455458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000409 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Donnelly, Catherine
Ashcroft, Rachelle
Mofina, Amanda
Bobbette, Nicole
Mulder, Carol
Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective
title Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective
title_full Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective
title_fullStr Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective
title_short Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective
title_sort measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000409
work_keys_str_mv AT donnellycatherine measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective
AT ashcroftrachelle measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective
AT mofinaamanda measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective
AT bobbettenicole measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective
AT muldercarol measuringtheperformanceofinterprofessionalprimaryhealthcareteamsunderstandingtheteamsperspective