Cargando…

Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether low PI-RADS v2 assessment categories are effective at excluding extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (≥pT3a PCa). METHODS: The local institutional ethics committee approved this retrospective analysis of 301 consecutive PCa patients. Patients were classif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alessi, Sarah, Pricolo, Paola, Summers, Paul, Femia, Marco, Tagliabue, Elena, Renne, Giuseppe, Bianchi, Roberto, Musi, Gennaro, De Cobelli, Ottavio, Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja, Bellomi, Massimo, Petralia, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06092-0
_version_ 1783447910150569984
author Alessi, Sarah
Pricolo, Paola
Summers, Paul
Femia, Marco
Tagliabue, Elena
Renne, Giuseppe
Bianchi, Roberto
Musi, Gennaro
De Cobelli, Ottavio
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
Bellomi, Massimo
Petralia, Giuseppe
author_facet Alessi, Sarah
Pricolo, Paola
Summers, Paul
Femia, Marco
Tagliabue, Elena
Renne, Giuseppe
Bianchi, Roberto
Musi, Gennaro
De Cobelli, Ottavio
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
Bellomi, Massimo
Petralia, Giuseppe
author_sort Alessi, Sarah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether low PI-RADS v2 assessment categories are effective at excluding extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (≥pT3a PCa). METHODS: The local institutional ethics committee approved this retrospective analysis of 301 consecutive PCa patients. Patients were classified as low- or intermediate/high-risk based on clinical parameters and underwent pre-surgical multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. A PI-RADS v2 assessment category and ESUR EPE score were assigned for each lesion by two readers working in consensus. Histopathologic analysis of the whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimen was the reference standard. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association of PI-RADS v2 assessment category with final histology ≥pT3a PCa. RESULTS: For a PI-RADS v2 assessment category threshold of 3, the overall performance for ruling out (sensitivity, negative predictive value, negative likelihood ratio) ≥pT3a PCa was 99%/98%/0.04 and was similar in both the low-risk (96%/97%/0.12; N = 137) and the intermediate/high-risk groups (100%/100%/0.0; N = 164). In univariate analysis, all clinical and tumor characteristics except age were significantly associated with ≥pT3a PCa. In multivariate analysis, PI-RADS v2 assessment categories ≤ 3 had a protective effect relative to categories 4 and 5. The inclusion of ESUR EPE score improved the AUC of ≥pT3a PCa prediction (from 0.73 to 0.86, p = 0.04 in the overall cohort). The impact of PI-RADS v2 assessment category is reflected in a nomogram derived on the basis of our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, low PI-RADS v2 assessment categories of 3 or less confidently ruled out the presence of ≥pT3a PCa irrespective of clinical risk group. KEY POINTS: • Our analysis of 301 mp-MRI and RARP specimens showed that the addition of PI-RADS v2 assessment categories to clinical parameters improves the exclusion of ≥pT3a (extraprostatic) prostate cancer. • PI-RADS v2 assessment categories of 1 to 3 are useful for excluding ≥pT3a prostate cancer with a NPV of 98%; such patients can be considered as candidates for less invasive approaches. • The ability to exclude ≥pT3a prostate cancer may improve confidence in choosing nerve-sparing surgery or in avoiding pelvic nodal dissections, and similarly for patients undergoing radiotherapy, in adopting short-course adjuvant hormonal therapy or foregoing prophylactic nodal irradiation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06092-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6719329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67193292019-09-19 Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients Alessi, Sarah Pricolo, Paola Summers, Paul Femia, Marco Tagliabue, Elena Renne, Giuseppe Bianchi, Roberto Musi, Gennaro De Cobelli, Ottavio Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja Bellomi, Massimo Petralia, Giuseppe Eur Radiol Urogenital OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether low PI-RADS v2 assessment categories are effective at excluding extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (≥pT3a PCa). METHODS: The local institutional ethics committee approved this retrospective analysis of 301 consecutive PCa patients. Patients were classified as low- or intermediate/high-risk based on clinical parameters and underwent pre-surgical multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. A PI-RADS v2 assessment category and ESUR EPE score were assigned for each lesion by two readers working in consensus. Histopathologic analysis of the whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimen was the reference standard. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association of PI-RADS v2 assessment category with final histology ≥pT3a PCa. RESULTS: For a PI-RADS v2 assessment category threshold of 3, the overall performance for ruling out (sensitivity, negative predictive value, negative likelihood ratio) ≥pT3a PCa was 99%/98%/0.04 and was similar in both the low-risk (96%/97%/0.12; N = 137) and the intermediate/high-risk groups (100%/100%/0.0; N = 164). In univariate analysis, all clinical and tumor characteristics except age were significantly associated with ≥pT3a PCa. In multivariate analysis, PI-RADS v2 assessment categories ≤ 3 had a protective effect relative to categories 4 and 5. The inclusion of ESUR EPE score improved the AUC of ≥pT3a PCa prediction (from 0.73 to 0.86, p = 0.04 in the overall cohort). The impact of PI-RADS v2 assessment category is reflected in a nomogram derived on the basis of our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, low PI-RADS v2 assessment categories of 3 or less confidently ruled out the presence of ≥pT3a PCa irrespective of clinical risk group. KEY POINTS: • Our analysis of 301 mp-MRI and RARP specimens showed that the addition of PI-RADS v2 assessment categories to clinical parameters improves the exclusion of ≥pT3a (extraprostatic) prostate cancer. • PI-RADS v2 assessment categories of 1 to 3 are useful for excluding ≥pT3a prostate cancer with a NPV of 98%; such patients can be considered as candidates for less invasive approaches. • The ability to exclude ≥pT3a prostate cancer may improve confidence in choosing nerve-sparing surgery or in avoiding pelvic nodal dissections, and similarly for patients undergoing radiotherapy, in adopting short-course adjuvant hormonal therapy or foregoing prophylactic nodal irradiation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06092-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-03-18 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6719329/ /pubmed/30887199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06092-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Urogenital
Alessi, Sarah
Pricolo, Paola
Summers, Paul
Femia, Marco
Tagliabue, Elena
Renne, Giuseppe
Bianchi, Roberto
Musi, Gennaro
De Cobelli, Ottavio
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
Bellomi, Massimo
Petralia, Giuseppe
Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients
title Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients
title_full Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients
title_fullStr Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients
title_full_unstemmed Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients
title_short Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients
title_sort low pi-rads assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pt3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients
topic Urogenital
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06092-0
work_keys_str_mv AT alessisarah lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT pricolopaola lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT summerspaul lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT femiamarco lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT tagliabueelena lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT rennegiuseppe lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT bianchiroberto lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT musigennaro lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT decobelliottavio lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT jereczekfossabarbaraalicja lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT bellomimassimo lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients
AT petraliagiuseppe lowpiradsassessmentcategoryexcludesextraprostaticextensionpt3aofprostatecancerahistologyvalidatedstudyincluding301operatedpatients