Cargando…

Prospective comparison of capillary and venous brain biomarker S100B: capillary samples have large inter-sample variation and poor correlation with venous samples

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the emergency management of mild traumatic brain injury have been used for over a decade and are considered safe. However, they recommend computerized tomography for at least half of these patients. The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guideline uses serum S100B protein...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vedin, Tomas, Karlsson, Mathias, Edelhamre, Marcus, Bergenheim, Mikael, Larsson, Per-Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-019-0239-6
_version_ 1783447918453194752
author Vedin, Tomas
Karlsson, Mathias
Edelhamre, Marcus
Bergenheim, Mikael
Larsson, Per-Anders
author_facet Vedin, Tomas
Karlsson, Mathias
Edelhamre, Marcus
Bergenheim, Mikael
Larsson, Per-Anders
author_sort Vedin, Tomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the emergency management of mild traumatic brain injury have been used for over a decade and are considered safe. However, they recommend computerized tomography for at least half of these patients. The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guideline uses serum S100B protein level to rule out intracranial hemorrhage. Analysis of capillary serum S100B protein level has not yet been employed for this purpose. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the correlation and agreement of capillary and venous serum S100B protein level over a spectrum of concentrations typical for mild traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Eighteen patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and 39 volunteers without trauma to the head within the past 7 days were recruited. Blood was sampled from patients with intracranial hemorrhage daily up to four consecutive days and healthy volunteers were sampled once during the study. One venous and two capillary samples were drawn at each sampling event. Samples were analyzed using the Cobas e411 S100 electrochemiluminescence assay. RESULTS: Median serum S100B protein level of capillary sampling 1 was 0.12 (IQR 0.075–0.21) μg/l and median serum S100B protein level of capillary sampling 2 was 0.13 (IQR 0.08–0.22) μg/l. Median serum S100B protein level of all venous samples was 0.05 (IQR 0.03–0.07) μg/l. Correlation plots of capillary and venous samples showed poor correlation and Bland-Altman plots showed a large dispersion of samples and wide limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that correlation and agreement between capillary and venous samples are low, and because of this, we cannot recommend studies on capillary serum S100B protein level to rule out intracranial hemorrhage in mild traumatic brain injury. Given the limitations of the current sampling and analysis methods of capillary protein S100B protein level, we conclude that evaluating its predictive ability to rule out intracranial hemorrhage should be withheld until more reliable methods can be incorporated into the study design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12245-019-0239-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6719369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67193692019-09-10 Prospective comparison of capillary and venous brain biomarker S100B: capillary samples have large inter-sample variation and poor correlation with venous samples Vedin, Tomas Karlsson, Mathias Edelhamre, Marcus Bergenheim, Mikael Larsson, Per-Anders Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the emergency management of mild traumatic brain injury have been used for over a decade and are considered safe. However, they recommend computerized tomography for at least half of these patients. The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guideline uses serum S100B protein level to rule out intracranial hemorrhage. Analysis of capillary serum S100B protein level has not yet been employed for this purpose. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the correlation and agreement of capillary and venous serum S100B protein level over a spectrum of concentrations typical for mild traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Eighteen patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and 39 volunteers without trauma to the head within the past 7 days were recruited. Blood was sampled from patients with intracranial hemorrhage daily up to four consecutive days and healthy volunteers were sampled once during the study. One venous and two capillary samples were drawn at each sampling event. Samples were analyzed using the Cobas e411 S100 electrochemiluminescence assay. RESULTS: Median serum S100B protein level of capillary sampling 1 was 0.12 (IQR 0.075–0.21) μg/l and median serum S100B protein level of capillary sampling 2 was 0.13 (IQR 0.08–0.22) μg/l. Median serum S100B protein level of all venous samples was 0.05 (IQR 0.03–0.07) μg/l. Correlation plots of capillary and venous samples showed poor correlation and Bland-Altman plots showed a large dispersion of samples and wide limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that correlation and agreement between capillary and venous samples are low, and because of this, we cannot recommend studies on capillary serum S100B protein level to rule out intracranial hemorrhage in mild traumatic brain injury. Given the limitations of the current sampling and analysis methods of capillary protein S100B protein level, we conclude that evaluating its predictive ability to rule out intracranial hemorrhage should be withheld until more reliable methods can be incorporated into the study design. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12245-019-0239-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6719369/ /pubmed/31477027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-019-0239-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Vedin, Tomas
Karlsson, Mathias
Edelhamre, Marcus
Bergenheim, Mikael
Larsson, Per-Anders
Prospective comparison of capillary and venous brain biomarker S100B: capillary samples have large inter-sample variation and poor correlation with venous samples
title Prospective comparison of capillary and venous brain biomarker S100B: capillary samples have large inter-sample variation and poor correlation with venous samples
title_full Prospective comparison of capillary and venous brain biomarker S100B: capillary samples have large inter-sample variation and poor correlation with venous samples
title_fullStr Prospective comparison of capillary and venous brain biomarker S100B: capillary samples have large inter-sample variation and poor correlation with venous samples
title_full_unstemmed Prospective comparison of capillary and venous brain biomarker S100B: capillary samples have large inter-sample variation and poor correlation with venous samples
title_short Prospective comparison of capillary and venous brain biomarker S100B: capillary samples have large inter-sample variation and poor correlation with venous samples
title_sort prospective comparison of capillary and venous brain biomarker s100b: capillary samples have large inter-sample variation and poor correlation with venous samples
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-019-0239-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vedintomas prospectivecomparisonofcapillaryandvenousbrainbiomarkers100bcapillarysampleshavelargeintersamplevariationandpoorcorrelationwithvenoussamples
AT karlssonmathias prospectivecomparisonofcapillaryandvenousbrainbiomarkers100bcapillarysampleshavelargeintersamplevariationandpoorcorrelationwithvenoussamples
AT edelhamremarcus prospectivecomparisonofcapillaryandvenousbrainbiomarkers100bcapillarysampleshavelargeintersamplevariationandpoorcorrelationwithvenoussamples
AT bergenheimmikael prospectivecomparisonofcapillaryandvenousbrainbiomarkers100bcapillarysampleshavelargeintersamplevariationandpoorcorrelationwithvenoussamples
AT larssonperanders prospectivecomparisonofcapillaryandvenousbrainbiomarkers100bcapillarysampleshavelargeintersamplevariationandpoorcorrelationwithvenoussamples