Cargando…
Radiofrequency-Assisted Liver Resection Versus Clamp-Crush Liver Resection: Protocol for an Updated Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Malignancy of the liver has historically meant a poor prognosis and remains the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Traditionally, hepatectomy has utilized the clamp-crush technique; however, this is associated with high incidence of postoperative complications. M...
Autores principales: | El-Koubani, Osman, McCann, Mark, Christmas, Daniel, Khanna, Aakash, von Maydell, Alexander |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31432783 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13437 |
Ejemplares similares
-
BiClamp® forcep liver transection versus clamp crushing technique for liver resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Chen, Jiang-ming, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Non-Stick Liver Parenchymal Transection With Saline-Linked Bipolar Clamp-Crush Technique in Robotic Liver Resection
por: Kajiwara, Masatoshi, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study
por: Qiu, Jiliang, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Clamp-Crushing versus stapler hepatectomy for transection of the parenchyma in elective hepatic resection (CRUNSH) - A randomized controlled trial (NCT01049607)
por: Rahbari, Nuh N, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Liver Resection with the Rf-Based Device Habib™-4X with the Clamp-Crush Technique
por: Jayant, Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)