Cargando…
Outcome of single-stage versus two-stage exchange for revision knee arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic infection
The gold standard for treating chronic periprosthetic joint infection is still considered to be double-stage exchange revision. The purpose of this review is to analyse the difference in terms of eradication rates and functional outcome after single- and double-stage prosthetic exchange for chronic...
Autores principales: | Pangaud, Corentin, Ollivier, Matthieu, Argenson, Jean-Noël |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31537999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.190003 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Revision TKA with a distal femoral replacement is at high risk of reinfection after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic knee joint infection
por: Theil, Christoph, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Single-stage revision for the infected total knee arthroplasty: the Cardiff experience
por: Razii, Nima, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results
por: Cavagnaro, Luca, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Autoclaved metal-on-cement spacer versus static spacer in two-stage revision in periprosthetic knee infection
por: Chen, Yu-Pin, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Change in organism between first- and second-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of knee arthroplasty independently associated with increased risk of failure: a two-centre study
por: Walker, Lucy C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)