Cargando…

Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study

OBJECTIVE: The attendance rate for cervical cancer screening in Norway is currently suboptimal at 69%, and an in-depth understanding of postponement of cervical cancer screening from the perspective of non-attenders is lacking. This study aims to generate knowledge about how non-attenders for cervic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aasbø, Gunvor, Solbrække, Kari Nyheim, Waller, Jo, Tropé, Ameli, Nygård, Mari, Hansen, Bo Terning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029505
_version_ 1783447986172329984
author Aasbø, Gunvor
Solbrække, Kari Nyheim
Waller, Jo
Tropé, Ameli
Nygård, Mari
Hansen, Bo Terning
author_facet Aasbø, Gunvor
Solbrække, Kari Nyheim
Waller, Jo
Tropé, Ameli
Nygård, Mari
Hansen, Bo Terning
author_sort Aasbø, Gunvor
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The attendance rate for cervical cancer screening in Norway is currently suboptimal at 69%, and an in-depth understanding of postponement of cervical cancer screening from the perspective of non-attenders is lacking. This study aims to generate knowledge about how non-attenders for cervical cancer screening reflect on booking a screening appointment. METHODS: Using the Norwegian cervical cancer screening registry, we identified and recruited women who were non-attenders to screening. Nine focus group interviews were carried out, with 41 women participating in the interviews. RESULTS: Four main themes were generated, which provide a comprehensive understanding of how women who are overdue for screening reflect on their hesitancy to book a screening appointment: ‘It’s easy to forget about it’, ‘Women have to arrange their own appointment’, ‘It has to be a ‘must’’ and ‘It’s a humiliating situation’. CONCLUSION: The degree to which women regard screening as important is affected by the nudging strategies employed in the screening programme and the facilitation of attendance provided by healthcare services. Dependence on one’s personal initiative to schedule a screening appointment and perception of a lack of responsibility on the part of healthcare services to attend screening may undermine informed and shared decision-making about screening attendance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6719771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67197712019-09-17 Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study Aasbø, Gunvor Solbrække, Kari Nyheim Waller, Jo Tropé, Ameli Nygård, Mari Hansen, Bo Terning BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVE: The attendance rate for cervical cancer screening in Norway is currently suboptimal at 69%, and an in-depth understanding of postponement of cervical cancer screening from the perspective of non-attenders is lacking. This study aims to generate knowledge about how non-attenders for cervical cancer screening reflect on booking a screening appointment. METHODS: Using the Norwegian cervical cancer screening registry, we identified and recruited women who were non-attenders to screening. Nine focus group interviews were carried out, with 41 women participating in the interviews. RESULTS: Four main themes were generated, which provide a comprehensive understanding of how women who are overdue for screening reflect on their hesitancy to book a screening appointment: ‘It’s easy to forget about it’, ‘Women have to arrange their own appointment’, ‘It has to be a ‘must’’ and ‘It’s a humiliating situation’. CONCLUSION: The degree to which women regard screening as important is affected by the nudging strategies employed in the screening programme and the facilitation of attendance provided by healthcare services. Dependence on one’s personal initiative to schedule a screening appointment and perception of a lack of responsibility on the part of healthcare services to attend screening may undermine informed and shared decision-making about screening attendance. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6719771/ /pubmed/31471438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029505 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Aasbø, Gunvor
Solbrække, Kari Nyheim
Waller, Jo
Tropé, Ameli
Nygård, Mari
Hansen, Bo Terning
Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study
title Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study
title_full Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study
title_fullStr Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study
title_short Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study
title_sort perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in norway: a qualitative focus group study
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6719771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029505
work_keys_str_mv AT aasbøgunvor perspectivesofnonattendersforcervicalcancerscreeninginnorwayaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT solbrækkekarinyheim perspectivesofnonattendersforcervicalcancerscreeninginnorwayaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT wallerjo perspectivesofnonattendersforcervicalcancerscreeninginnorwayaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT tropeameli perspectivesofnonattendersforcervicalcancerscreeninginnorwayaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT nygardmari perspectivesofnonattendersforcervicalcancerscreeninginnorwayaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT hansenboterning perspectivesofnonattendersforcervicalcancerscreeninginnorwayaqualitativefocusgroupstudy