Diagnosis of Feline Food Sensitivity and Intolerance Using Saliva: 1000 Cases

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study asked whether a novel saliva-based diagnostic test could predict food sensitivities and intolerances in cats. Clinical samples were obtained from 1000 cats proven or suspected to have adverse food reactions (AFR). Most were domestic shorthairs over 10 years old and weighed around 5 kg; they were equally distributed between spayed females and neutered males. Saliva was collected after at least an 8-h fast with a dental cotton rope, placed in a special saliva collection tube, and sent to the laboratory. Salivary reactions to 24 common foods were measured with immunological reagents. Low reacting foods were lamb, cow milk, pork, turkey, wheat (lowest) and white-colored fish, whereas high reacting foods were millet, white potato, rice (highest) and salmon. Thus, this novel salivary-based food sensitivity and intolerance test, described previously for dogs, also provided a reliable and clinically predictive alternative to other methods of measuring AFR in cats. ABSTRACT: This prospective study assessed the efficacy of a novel saliva-based immunoassay of IgA- and IgM-antibodies in predicting feline food sensitivities and intolerances. Clinical samples were obtained from 1000 cats proven or suspected to have food intolerances. Most were of domestic shorthair breed type, over 10 years of age, and weighed around 5 kg; they were equally distributed between spayed females and neutered males. Saliva was collected after at least an 8-h fast with a dental cotton rope, placed in a double-sleeved saliva collection tube, and sent to the laboratory. Salivary antibodies elicited by 24 common foods were measured with goat anti-canine IgA and IgM. Low reacting foods were lamb, cow milk, pork, turkey, wheat (lowest) and white-colored fish, whereas high reacting foods were millet, white potato, rice (highest) and salmon. Thus, the novel salivary-based food sensitivity and intolerance test, described previously for canines, also provided a reliable and clinically predictive alternative to food elimination trials, serum-based food allergy testing, and skin patch testing in cats. Manufacturers of commercial cat foods and treats, as well as those making homemade diets and treats for cats, should consider avoiding the more highly reactive foods as determined by the present study.