Cargando…
A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls)
BACKGROUND: Few adolescent girls engage in enough physical activity (PA) to meet recommendations and there is a need for new interventions to increase girls PA. We have previously published the results of the PLAN-A cluster randomised feasibility trial which was a peer-led school-based PA interventi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7545-z |
_version_ | 1783448044241420288 |
---|---|
author | Sebire, Simon J. Banfield, Kathryn Jago, Russell Edwards, Mark J. Campbell, Rona Kipping, Ruth Blair, Peter S. Kadir, Bryar Garfield, Kirsty Matthews, Joe Lyons, Ronan A. Hollingworth, William |
author_facet | Sebire, Simon J. Banfield, Kathryn Jago, Russell Edwards, Mark J. Campbell, Rona Kipping, Ruth Blair, Peter S. Kadir, Bryar Garfield, Kirsty Matthews, Joe Lyons, Ronan A. Hollingworth, William |
author_sort | Sebire, Simon J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few adolescent girls engage in enough physical activity (PA) to meet recommendations and there is a need for new interventions to increase girls PA. We have previously published the results of the PLAN-A cluster randomised feasibility trial which was a peer-led school-based PA intervention, showing that the intervention was feasible and held promise to increase the PA of girls aged 12–13 years. In PLAN-A, pupils nominated by their peers as influential attend training to teach them how to influence, promote and normalise physical activity amongst their peer-group. This paper reports the results of the process evaluation of the PLAN-A feasibility study, specifically focussing on acceptability to key stakeholders, intervention fidelity, receipt/experiences and perceived effect and suggested intervention refinements before proceeding to a definitive RCT. METHODS: A mixed-methods process evaluation triangulated data from qualitative focus groups and interviews with peer-supporter and non peer-supporter pupils (N = 52), parents (N = 12), teachers (N = 6) and intervention training deliverers (N = 5), quantitative questionnaires, and observations of intervention delivery. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed with the Framework Method. RESULTS: The duration, timings, content and delivery of the peer-supporter training were acceptable. There was good fidelity to the intervention manual and its underpinning theory including high fulfilment of session objectives and use of an autonomy-supportive motivational style. Peer-supporters engaged with and enjoyed the training and retained key peer-supporter messages (what counts as PA, encouragement, empathy and subtlety). Parents and teachers were supportive of the intervention and reported perceived effects including increased PA and awareness of it, improved peer relationships, and confidence. Suggested intervention refinements included increasing participatory learning, reducing technical jargon, and providing more support to overcome challenges to giving peer support. CONCLUSIONS: PLAN-A can be delivered as planned, is well-received, and appears to be effective in empowering adolescent girls to support their peer group to become more active. The refinements identified can be made within the original intervention structure, before proceeding to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISCTRN, ISRCTN12543546, Registered on 28/7/2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6720066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67200662019-09-06 A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) Sebire, Simon J. Banfield, Kathryn Jago, Russell Edwards, Mark J. Campbell, Rona Kipping, Ruth Blair, Peter S. Kadir, Bryar Garfield, Kirsty Matthews, Joe Lyons, Ronan A. Hollingworth, William BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Few adolescent girls engage in enough physical activity (PA) to meet recommendations and there is a need for new interventions to increase girls PA. We have previously published the results of the PLAN-A cluster randomised feasibility trial which was a peer-led school-based PA intervention, showing that the intervention was feasible and held promise to increase the PA of girls aged 12–13 years. In PLAN-A, pupils nominated by their peers as influential attend training to teach them how to influence, promote and normalise physical activity amongst their peer-group. This paper reports the results of the process evaluation of the PLAN-A feasibility study, specifically focussing on acceptability to key stakeholders, intervention fidelity, receipt/experiences and perceived effect and suggested intervention refinements before proceeding to a definitive RCT. METHODS: A mixed-methods process evaluation triangulated data from qualitative focus groups and interviews with peer-supporter and non peer-supporter pupils (N = 52), parents (N = 12), teachers (N = 6) and intervention training deliverers (N = 5), quantitative questionnaires, and observations of intervention delivery. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed with the Framework Method. RESULTS: The duration, timings, content and delivery of the peer-supporter training were acceptable. There was good fidelity to the intervention manual and its underpinning theory including high fulfilment of session objectives and use of an autonomy-supportive motivational style. Peer-supporters engaged with and enjoyed the training and retained key peer-supporter messages (what counts as PA, encouragement, empathy and subtlety). Parents and teachers were supportive of the intervention and reported perceived effects including increased PA and awareness of it, improved peer relationships, and confidence. Suggested intervention refinements included increasing participatory learning, reducing technical jargon, and providing more support to overcome challenges to giving peer support. CONCLUSIONS: PLAN-A can be delivered as planned, is well-received, and appears to be effective in empowering adolescent girls to support their peer group to become more active. The refinements identified can be made within the original intervention structure, before proceeding to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISCTRN, ISRCTN12543546, Registered on 28/7/2015. BioMed Central 2019-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6720066/ /pubmed/31477088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7545-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sebire, Simon J. Banfield, Kathryn Jago, Russell Edwards, Mark J. Campbell, Rona Kipping, Ruth Blair, Peter S. Kadir, Bryar Garfield, Kirsty Matthews, Joe Lyons, Ronan A. Hollingworth, William A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) |
title | A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) |
title_full | A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) |
title_fullStr | A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) |
title_full_unstemmed | A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) |
title_short | A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) |
title_sort | process evaluation of the plan-a intervention (peer-led physical activity intervention for adolescent girls) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7545-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sebiresimonj aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT banfieldkathryn aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT jagorussell aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT edwardsmarkj aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT campbellrona aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT kippingruth aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT blairpeters aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT kadirbryar aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT garfieldkirsty aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT matthewsjoe aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT lyonsronana aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT hollingworthwilliam aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT sebiresimonj processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT banfieldkathryn processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT jagorussell processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT edwardsmarkj processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT campbellrona processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT kippingruth processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT blairpeters processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT kadirbryar processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT garfieldkirsty processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT matthewsjoe processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT lyonsronana processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls AT hollingworthwilliam processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls |