Cargando…

A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls)

BACKGROUND: Few adolescent girls engage in enough physical activity (PA) to meet recommendations and there is a need for new interventions to increase girls PA. We have previously published the results of the PLAN-A cluster randomised feasibility trial which was a peer-led school-based PA interventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebire, Simon J., Banfield, Kathryn, Jago, Russell, Edwards, Mark J., Campbell, Rona, Kipping, Ruth, Blair, Peter S., Kadir, Bryar, Garfield, Kirsty, Matthews, Joe, Lyons, Ronan A., Hollingworth, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7545-z
_version_ 1783448044241420288
author Sebire, Simon J.
Banfield, Kathryn
Jago, Russell
Edwards, Mark J.
Campbell, Rona
Kipping, Ruth
Blair, Peter S.
Kadir, Bryar
Garfield, Kirsty
Matthews, Joe
Lyons, Ronan A.
Hollingworth, William
author_facet Sebire, Simon J.
Banfield, Kathryn
Jago, Russell
Edwards, Mark J.
Campbell, Rona
Kipping, Ruth
Blair, Peter S.
Kadir, Bryar
Garfield, Kirsty
Matthews, Joe
Lyons, Ronan A.
Hollingworth, William
author_sort Sebire, Simon J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few adolescent girls engage in enough physical activity (PA) to meet recommendations and there is a need for new interventions to increase girls PA. We have previously published the results of the PLAN-A cluster randomised feasibility trial which was a peer-led school-based PA intervention, showing that the intervention was feasible and held promise to increase the PA of girls aged 12–13 years. In PLAN-A, pupils nominated by their peers as influential attend training to teach them how to influence, promote and normalise physical activity amongst their peer-group. This paper reports the results of the process evaluation of the PLAN-A feasibility study, specifically focussing on acceptability to key stakeholders, intervention fidelity, receipt/experiences and perceived effect and suggested intervention refinements before proceeding to a definitive RCT. METHODS: A mixed-methods process evaluation triangulated data from qualitative focus groups and interviews with peer-supporter and non peer-supporter pupils (N = 52), parents (N = 12), teachers (N = 6) and intervention training deliverers (N = 5), quantitative questionnaires, and observations of intervention delivery. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed with the Framework Method. RESULTS: The duration, timings, content and delivery of the peer-supporter training were acceptable. There was good fidelity to the intervention manual and its underpinning theory including high fulfilment of session objectives and use of an autonomy-supportive motivational style. Peer-supporters engaged with and enjoyed the training and retained key peer-supporter messages (what counts as PA, encouragement, empathy and subtlety). Parents and teachers were supportive of the intervention and reported perceived effects including increased PA and awareness of it, improved peer relationships, and confidence. Suggested intervention refinements included increasing participatory learning, reducing technical jargon, and providing more support to overcome challenges to giving peer support. CONCLUSIONS: PLAN-A can be delivered as planned, is well-received, and appears to be effective in empowering adolescent girls to support their peer group to become more active. The refinements identified can be made within the original intervention structure, before proceeding to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISCTRN, ISRCTN12543546, Registered on 28/7/2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6720066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67200662019-09-06 A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) Sebire, Simon J. Banfield, Kathryn Jago, Russell Edwards, Mark J. Campbell, Rona Kipping, Ruth Blair, Peter S. Kadir, Bryar Garfield, Kirsty Matthews, Joe Lyons, Ronan A. Hollingworth, William BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Few adolescent girls engage in enough physical activity (PA) to meet recommendations and there is a need for new interventions to increase girls PA. We have previously published the results of the PLAN-A cluster randomised feasibility trial which was a peer-led school-based PA intervention, showing that the intervention was feasible and held promise to increase the PA of girls aged 12–13 years. In PLAN-A, pupils nominated by their peers as influential attend training to teach them how to influence, promote and normalise physical activity amongst their peer-group. This paper reports the results of the process evaluation of the PLAN-A feasibility study, specifically focussing on acceptability to key stakeholders, intervention fidelity, receipt/experiences and perceived effect and suggested intervention refinements before proceeding to a definitive RCT. METHODS: A mixed-methods process evaluation triangulated data from qualitative focus groups and interviews with peer-supporter and non peer-supporter pupils (N = 52), parents (N = 12), teachers (N = 6) and intervention training deliverers (N = 5), quantitative questionnaires, and observations of intervention delivery. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed with the Framework Method. RESULTS: The duration, timings, content and delivery of the peer-supporter training were acceptable. There was good fidelity to the intervention manual and its underpinning theory including high fulfilment of session objectives and use of an autonomy-supportive motivational style. Peer-supporters engaged with and enjoyed the training and retained key peer-supporter messages (what counts as PA, encouragement, empathy and subtlety). Parents and teachers were supportive of the intervention and reported perceived effects including increased PA and awareness of it, improved peer relationships, and confidence. Suggested intervention refinements included increasing participatory learning, reducing technical jargon, and providing more support to overcome challenges to giving peer support. CONCLUSIONS: PLAN-A can be delivered as planned, is well-received, and appears to be effective in empowering adolescent girls to support their peer group to become more active. The refinements identified can be made within the original intervention structure, before proceeding to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISCTRN, ISRCTN12543546, Registered on 28/7/2015. BioMed Central 2019-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6720066/ /pubmed/31477088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7545-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sebire, Simon J.
Banfield, Kathryn
Jago, Russell
Edwards, Mark J.
Campbell, Rona
Kipping, Ruth
Blair, Peter S.
Kadir, Bryar
Garfield, Kirsty
Matthews, Joe
Lyons, Ronan A.
Hollingworth, William
A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls)
title A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls)
title_full A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls)
title_fullStr A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls)
title_full_unstemmed A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls)
title_short A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls)
title_sort process evaluation of the plan-a intervention (peer-led physical activity intervention for adolescent girls)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7545-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sebiresimonj aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT banfieldkathryn aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT jagorussell aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT edwardsmarkj aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT campbellrona aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT kippingruth aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT blairpeters aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT kadirbryar aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT garfieldkirsty aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT matthewsjoe aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT lyonsronana aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT hollingworthwilliam aprocessevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT sebiresimonj processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT banfieldkathryn processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT jagorussell processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT edwardsmarkj processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT campbellrona processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT kippingruth processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT blairpeters processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT kadirbryar processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT garfieldkirsty processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT matthewsjoe processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT lyonsronana processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls
AT hollingworthwilliam processevaluationoftheplanainterventionpeerledphysicalactivityinterventionforadolescentgirls