Cargando…

What change in body mass index is associated with improvement in percentage body fat in childhood obesity? A meta-regression

OBJECTIVE: Using meta-regression this paper sets out the minimum change in body mass index-SD score (BMI-SDS) required to improve adiposity as percentage body fat for children and adolescents with obesity. DESIGN: Meta-regression. SETTING: Studies were identified as part of a large-scale systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birch, Laura, Perry, Rachel, Hunt, Linda P, Matson, Rhys, Chong, Amanda, Beynon, Rhona, Shield, Julian PH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31473614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028231
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Using meta-regression this paper sets out the minimum change in body mass index-SD score (BMI-SDS) required to improve adiposity as percentage body fat for children and adolescents with obesity. DESIGN: Meta-regression. SETTING: Studies were identified as part of a large-scale systematic review of the following electronic databases: AMED, Embase, MEDLINE via OVID, Web of Science and CENTRAL via Cochrane library. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 4–19 years with a diagnosis of obesity according to defined BMI thresholds. INTERVENTIONS: Studies of lifestyle treatment interventions that included dietary, physical activity and/or behavioural components with the objective of reducing obesity were included. Interventions of <2 weeks duration and those that involved surgical and/or pharmacological components (eg, bariatric surgery, drug therapy) were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: To be included in the review, studies had to report baseline and post-intervention BMI-SDS or change measurements (primary outcome measures) plus one or more of the following markers of metabolic health (secondary outcome measures): adiposity measures other than BMI; blood pressure; glucose; inflammation; insulin sensitivity/resistance; lipid profile; liver function. This paper focuses on adiposity measures only. Further papers in this series will report on other outcome measures. RESULTS: This paper explores the potential impact of BMI-SDS reduction in terms of change in percentage body fat. Thirty-nine studies reporting change in mean percentage body fat were analysed. Meta-regression demonstrated that reduction of at least 0.6 in mean BMI-SDS ensured a mean reduction of percentage body fat mass, in the sense that the associated 95% prediction interval for change in mean percentage body fat was wholly negative. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions demonstrating reductions of 0.6 BMI-SDS might be termed successful in reducing adiposity, a key purpose of weight management interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016025317.