Cargando…

Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Medical errors are considered as a major threat to patient safety. To clarify medical errors’ status in Iran, a review was conducted to estimate the accurate prevalence of medical errors. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in international databases (MEDLINE, Scopus and the We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaziri, Siavash, Fakouri, Farya, Mirzaei, Maryam, Afsharian, Mandana, Azizi, Mohsen, Arab-Zozani, Morteza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4464-8
_version_ 1783448116742062080
author Vaziri, Siavash
Fakouri, Farya
Mirzaei, Maryam
Afsharian, Mandana
Azizi, Mohsen
Arab-Zozani, Morteza
author_facet Vaziri, Siavash
Fakouri, Farya
Mirzaei, Maryam
Afsharian, Mandana
Azizi, Mohsen
Arab-Zozani, Morteza
author_sort Vaziri, Siavash
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical errors are considered as a major threat to patient safety. To clarify medical errors’ status in Iran, a review was conducted to estimate the accurate prevalence of medical errors. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in international databases (MEDLINE, Scopus and the Web of Science), national databases (SID, Magiran, and Barakat) and Google Scholar search engine. The search was performed without time limitation up to January 2017 using the MeSH terms of Medical “error(s)” and “Iran” in Endnote X5. Article in English and Persian which estimated the prevalence of medical errors in Iran were eligible to be included in this review. The JBI appraisal instrument was used to assess the quality of included studies, by two independent reviewers. The prevalence of medical errors was calculating using random effect model. Stata software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: In 40 included studies, the most frequent occupational group observed were nursing staff and nursing students (21 studies; 52% of studies). The most reported type of error was medication error (25 studies; 62% of studies, with prevalence ranged from 10 to 80%). University or teaching hospitals (30 studies; 75% of studies) as well as, internal/intensive care wards (10 studies; 25% of studies) were the most frequent hospitals and wards detected. Based on the result of the random effect model, the overall estimated prevalence of medical errors was 50% (95% confidence interval: 0.426, 0.574). CONCLUSION: Result of the comprehensive literature review of the current studies, found a wide variation in the prevalence of medical errors based on the occupational group, type of error, and health care setting. In this regards, providing enough education to nurses, improvement of patient safety culture and quality of services and attention to special wards, especially in teaching hospitals are suggested. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4464-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6720396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67203962019-09-06 Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis Vaziri, Siavash Fakouri, Farya Mirzaei, Maryam Afsharian, Mandana Azizi, Mohsen Arab-Zozani, Morteza BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical errors are considered as a major threat to patient safety. To clarify medical errors’ status in Iran, a review was conducted to estimate the accurate prevalence of medical errors. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in international databases (MEDLINE, Scopus and the Web of Science), national databases (SID, Magiran, and Barakat) and Google Scholar search engine. The search was performed without time limitation up to January 2017 using the MeSH terms of Medical “error(s)” and “Iran” in Endnote X5. Article in English and Persian which estimated the prevalence of medical errors in Iran were eligible to be included in this review. The JBI appraisal instrument was used to assess the quality of included studies, by two independent reviewers. The prevalence of medical errors was calculating using random effect model. Stata software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: In 40 included studies, the most frequent occupational group observed were nursing staff and nursing students (21 studies; 52% of studies). The most reported type of error was medication error (25 studies; 62% of studies, with prevalence ranged from 10 to 80%). University or teaching hospitals (30 studies; 75% of studies) as well as, internal/intensive care wards (10 studies; 25% of studies) were the most frequent hospitals and wards detected. Based on the result of the random effect model, the overall estimated prevalence of medical errors was 50% (95% confidence interval: 0.426, 0.574). CONCLUSION: Result of the comprehensive literature review of the current studies, found a wide variation in the prevalence of medical errors based on the occupational group, type of error, and health care setting. In this regards, providing enough education to nurses, improvement of patient safety culture and quality of services and attention to special wards, especially in teaching hospitals are suggested. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4464-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6720396/ /pubmed/31477096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4464-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vaziri, Siavash
Fakouri, Farya
Mirzaei, Maryam
Afsharian, Mandana
Azizi, Mohsen
Arab-Zozani, Morteza
Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of medical errors in iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4464-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vazirisiavash prevalenceofmedicalerrorsiniranasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fakourifarya prevalenceofmedicalerrorsiniranasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mirzaeimaryam prevalenceofmedicalerrorsiniranasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT afsharianmandana prevalenceofmedicalerrorsiniranasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT azizimohsen prevalenceofmedicalerrorsiniranasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT arabzozanimorteza prevalenceofmedicalerrorsiniranasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis