Cargando…
von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and severe portal hypertens...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31473610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025656 |
_version_ | 1783448134771277824 |
---|---|
author | Zou, Ziyuan Yan, Xinwen Li, Cheng Li, Xiaofeng Ma, Xiaofen Zhang, Chunqing Ju, Shenghong Tian, Junzhang Qi, Xiaolong |
author_facet | Zou, Ziyuan Yan, Xinwen Li, Cheng Li, Xiaofeng Ma, Xiaofen Zhang, Chunqing Ju, Shenghong Tian, Junzhang Qi, Xiaolong |
author_sort | Zou, Ziyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and severe portal hypertension (SPH). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were screened up to 5 April 2018. Studies related to the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect CSPH and/or SPH with HVPG as the reference standard were included. Study quality was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies scale. Two authors independently used a standardised form to extract data. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the correlation coefficient between vWF and HVPG. The secondary outcome was the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect CSPH or SPH. RESULTS: A total of six articles involving 994 patients were included in this study. Five of the included articles were used to stratify the results for the correlation coefficient, three for the diagnostic performance of CSPH and two for SPH. The pooled correlation coefficient based on the random effects model was 0.54 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.69), thus suggesting a moderate correlation between vWF and HVPG. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of vWF for CSPH detection were 82% (95% CI 78 to 86), 76% (95% CI 68 to 83) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.94), respectively. Regarding the ability of vWF to detect SPH, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI 80 to 90) and 75% (95% CI 66 to 83), respectively. These results supported the satisfactory diagnostic performance of vWF for CSPH and SPH detection. CONCLUSIONS: vWF, as a novel biomarker, has a moderate correlation with HVPG and shows a satisfactory performance for the diagnosis of CSPH and SPH in patients with cirrhosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6720471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67204712019-09-17 von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zou, Ziyuan Yan, Xinwen Li, Cheng Li, Xiaofeng Ma, Xiaofen Zhang, Chunqing Ju, Shenghong Tian, Junzhang Qi, Xiaolong BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and severe portal hypertension (SPH). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were screened up to 5 April 2018. Studies related to the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect CSPH and/or SPH with HVPG as the reference standard were included. Study quality was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies scale. Two authors independently used a standardised form to extract data. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the correlation coefficient between vWF and HVPG. The secondary outcome was the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect CSPH or SPH. RESULTS: A total of six articles involving 994 patients were included in this study. Five of the included articles were used to stratify the results for the correlation coefficient, three for the diagnostic performance of CSPH and two for SPH. The pooled correlation coefficient based on the random effects model was 0.54 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.69), thus suggesting a moderate correlation between vWF and HVPG. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of vWF for CSPH detection were 82% (95% CI 78 to 86), 76% (95% CI 68 to 83) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.94), respectively. Regarding the ability of vWF to detect SPH, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI 80 to 90) and 75% (95% CI 66 to 83), respectively. These results supported the satisfactory diagnostic performance of vWF for CSPH and SPH detection. CONCLUSIONS: vWF, as a novel biomarker, has a moderate correlation with HVPG and shows a satisfactory performance for the diagnosis of CSPH and SPH in patients with cirrhosis. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6720471/ /pubmed/31473610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025656 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology and Hepatology Zou, Ziyuan Yan, Xinwen Li, Cheng Li, Xiaofeng Ma, Xiaofen Zhang, Chunqing Ju, Shenghong Tian, Junzhang Qi, Xiaolong von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | von willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31473610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zouziyuan vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanxinwen vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT licheng vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lixiaofeng vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maxiaofen vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangchunqing vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jushenghong vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tianjunzhang vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qixiaolong vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |