Cargando…

von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and severe portal hypertens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zou, Ziyuan, Yan, Xinwen, Li, Cheng, Li, Xiaofeng, Ma, Xiaofen, Zhang, Chunqing, Ju, Shenghong, Tian, Junzhang, Qi, Xiaolong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31473610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025656
_version_ 1783448134771277824
author Zou, Ziyuan
Yan, Xinwen
Li, Cheng
Li, Xiaofeng
Ma, Xiaofen
Zhang, Chunqing
Ju, Shenghong
Tian, Junzhang
Qi, Xiaolong
author_facet Zou, Ziyuan
Yan, Xinwen
Li, Cheng
Li, Xiaofeng
Ma, Xiaofen
Zhang, Chunqing
Ju, Shenghong
Tian, Junzhang
Qi, Xiaolong
author_sort Zou, Ziyuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and severe portal hypertension (SPH). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were screened up to 5 April 2018. Studies related to the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect CSPH and/or SPH with HVPG as the reference standard were included. Study quality was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies scale. Two authors independently used a standardised form to extract data. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the correlation coefficient between vWF and HVPG. The secondary outcome was the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect CSPH or SPH. RESULTS: A total of six articles involving 994 patients were included in this study. Five of the included articles were used to stratify the results for the correlation coefficient, three for the diagnostic performance of CSPH and two for SPH. The pooled correlation coefficient based on the random effects model was 0.54 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.69), thus suggesting a moderate correlation between vWF and HVPG. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of vWF for CSPH detection were 82% (95% CI 78 to 86), 76% (95% CI 68 to 83) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.94), respectively. Regarding the ability of vWF to detect SPH, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI 80 to 90) and 75% (95% CI 66 to 83), respectively. These results supported the satisfactory diagnostic performance of vWF for CSPH and SPH detection. CONCLUSIONS: vWF, as a novel biomarker, has a moderate correlation with HVPG and shows a satisfactory performance for the diagnosis of CSPH and SPH in patients with cirrhosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6720471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67204712019-09-17 von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zou, Ziyuan Yan, Xinwen Li, Cheng Li, Xiaofeng Ma, Xiaofen Zhang, Chunqing Ju, Shenghong Tian, Junzhang Qi, Xiaolong BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and severe portal hypertension (SPH). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were screened up to 5 April 2018. Studies related to the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect CSPH and/or SPH with HVPG as the reference standard were included. Study quality was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies scale. Two authors independently used a standardised form to extract data. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the correlation coefficient between vWF and HVPG. The secondary outcome was the diagnostic performance of vWF to detect CSPH or SPH. RESULTS: A total of six articles involving 994 patients were included in this study. Five of the included articles were used to stratify the results for the correlation coefficient, three for the diagnostic performance of CSPH and two for SPH. The pooled correlation coefficient based on the random effects model was 0.54 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.69), thus suggesting a moderate correlation between vWF and HVPG. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of vWF for CSPH detection were 82% (95% CI 78 to 86), 76% (95% CI 68 to 83) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.94), respectively. Regarding the ability of vWF to detect SPH, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI 80 to 90) and 75% (95% CI 66 to 83), respectively. These results supported the satisfactory diagnostic performance of vWF for CSPH and SPH detection. CONCLUSIONS: vWF, as a novel biomarker, has a moderate correlation with HVPG and shows a satisfactory performance for the diagnosis of CSPH and SPH in patients with cirrhosis. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6720471/ /pubmed/31473610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025656 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Zou, Ziyuan
Yan, Xinwen
Li, Cheng
Li, Xiaofeng
Ma, Xiaofen
Zhang, Chunqing
Ju, Shenghong
Tian, Junzhang
Qi, Xiaolong
von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short von Willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort von willebrand factor as a biomarker of clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Gastroenterology and Hepatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31473610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025656
work_keys_str_mv AT zouziyuan vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanxinwen vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT licheng vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixiaofeng vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maxiaofen vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangchunqing vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jushenghong vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tianjunzhang vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qixiaolong vonwillebrandfactorasabiomarkerofclinicallysignificantportalhypertensionandsevereportalhypertensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis