Cargando…
The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study
OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a new clinical prediction rule to risk-stratify emergency department (ED) patients admitted with suspected sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective prognostic study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: ED. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥18 years who met two Systemic Inflamm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030922 |
_version_ | 1783448136704851968 |
---|---|
author | Sivayoham, Narani Blake, Lesley A Tharimoopantavida, Shafi E Chughtai, Saad Hussain, Adil N Cecconi, Maurizio Rhodes, Andrew |
author_facet | Sivayoham, Narani Blake, Lesley A Tharimoopantavida, Shafi E Chughtai, Saad Hussain, Adil N Cecconi, Maurizio Rhodes, Andrew |
author_sort | Sivayoham, Narani |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a new clinical prediction rule to risk-stratify emergency department (ED) patients admitted with suspected sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective prognostic study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: ED. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥18 years who met two Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria or one Red Flag sepsis criteria on arrival, received intravenous antibiotics for a suspected infection and admitted. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: In-hospital all-cause mortality. METHOD: The data were divided into derivation and validation cohorts. The simplified-Mortality in Severe Sepsis in the ED score and quick-SOFA scores, refractory hypotension and lactate were collectively termed ‘component scores’ and cumulatively termed the ‘Risk-stratification of ED suspected Sepsis (REDS) score’. Each patient in the derivation cohort received a score (0–3) for each component score. The REDS score ranged from 0 to 12. The component scores were subject to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the REDS and the components scores were constructed and their cut-off points identified. Scores above the cut-off points were deemed high-risk. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk category of the REDS score and component scores were compared. The REDS score was internally validated. RESULTS: 2115 patients of whom 282 (13.3%) died in hospital. Derivation cohort: 1078 patients with 140 deaths (13%). The AUROC curve with 95% CI, cut-off point and sensitivity for mortality (95% CI) of the high-risk category of the REDS score were: derivation: 0.78 (0.75 to 0.80); ≥3; 85.0 (78 to 90.5). Validation: 0.74 (0.71 to 0.76); ≥3; 84.5 (77.5 to 90.0). The AUROC curve and the sensitivity for mortality of the REDS score was better than that of the component scores. Specificity and mortality rates for REDS scores of ≥3, ≥5 and ≥7 were 54.8%, 88.8% and 96.9% and 21.8%, 36.0% and 49.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The REDS score is a simple and objective score to risk-stratify ED patients with suspected sepsis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6720479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67204792019-09-17 The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study Sivayoham, Narani Blake, Lesley A Tharimoopantavida, Shafi E Chughtai, Saad Hussain, Adil N Cecconi, Maurizio Rhodes, Andrew BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a new clinical prediction rule to risk-stratify emergency department (ED) patients admitted with suspected sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective prognostic study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: ED. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥18 years who met two Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria or one Red Flag sepsis criteria on arrival, received intravenous antibiotics for a suspected infection and admitted. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: In-hospital all-cause mortality. METHOD: The data were divided into derivation and validation cohorts. The simplified-Mortality in Severe Sepsis in the ED score and quick-SOFA scores, refractory hypotension and lactate were collectively termed ‘component scores’ and cumulatively termed the ‘Risk-stratification of ED suspected Sepsis (REDS) score’. Each patient in the derivation cohort received a score (0–3) for each component score. The REDS score ranged from 0 to 12. The component scores were subject to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the REDS and the components scores were constructed and their cut-off points identified. Scores above the cut-off points were deemed high-risk. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk category of the REDS score and component scores were compared. The REDS score was internally validated. RESULTS: 2115 patients of whom 282 (13.3%) died in hospital. Derivation cohort: 1078 patients with 140 deaths (13%). The AUROC curve with 95% CI, cut-off point and sensitivity for mortality (95% CI) of the high-risk category of the REDS score were: derivation: 0.78 (0.75 to 0.80); ≥3; 85.0 (78 to 90.5). Validation: 0.74 (0.71 to 0.76); ≥3; 84.5 (77.5 to 90.0). The AUROC curve and the sensitivity for mortality of the REDS score was better than that of the component scores. Specificity and mortality rates for REDS scores of ≥3, ≥5 and ≥7 were 54.8%, 88.8% and 96.9% and 21.8%, 36.0% and 49.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The REDS score is a simple and objective score to risk-stratify ED patients with suspected sepsis. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6720479/ /pubmed/31455715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030922 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Sivayoham, Narani Blake, Lesley A Tharimoopantavida, Shafi E Chughtai, Saad Hussain, Adil N Cecconi, Maurizio Rhodes, Andrew The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title | The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_full | The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_fullStr | The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_short | The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
title_sort | reds score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030922 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sivayohamnarani theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT blakelesleya theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT tharimoopantavidashafie theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT chughtaisaad theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT hussainadiln theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT cecconimaurizio theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT rhodesandrew theredsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT sivayohamnarani redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT blakelesleya redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT tharimoopantavidashafie redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT chughtaisaad redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT hussainadiln redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT cecconimaurizio redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy AT rhodesandrew redsscoreanewscoringsystemtoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsisaderivationandvalidationstudy |