Cargando…
Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study
OBJECTIVES: In 2009, not all journal editors considered systematic reviews (SRs) to be original research studies, and not all PubMed Core Clinical Journals published SRs. The aim of this study was to conduct a new analysis about editors’ opinion regarding SRs as original research. DESIGN: We conduct...
Autores principales: | Krnic Martinic, Marina, Meerpohl, Joerg J, von Elm, Erik, Herrle, Florian, Marusic, Ana, Puljak, Livia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029704 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Correction: Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience
por: Maticic, Katarina, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Creating an online educational intervention to improve knowledge about systematic reviews among healthcare workers: mixed-methods pilot study
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)