Cargando…

A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating

The bacterial biofilm formation in the oral cavity and the microbial activity around the implant tissue represent a potential factor on the interface between bone and implant fixture that could induce an inflammatory phenomenon and generate an increased risk for mucositis and peri-implantitis. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carinci, Francesco, Lauritano, Dorina, Bignozzi, Carlo Alberto, Pazzi, Daniele, Candotto, Valentina, Santos de Oliveira, Paulo, Scarano, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31405061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163897
_version_ 1783448157074489344
author Carinci, Francesco
Lauritano, Dorina
Bignozzi, Carlo Alberto
Pazzi, Daniele
Candotto, Valentina
Santos de Oliveira, Paulo
Scarano, Antonio
author_facet Carinci, Francesco
Lauritano, Dorina
Bignozzi, Carlo Alberto
Pazzi, Daniele
Candotto, Valentina
Santos de Oliveira, Paulo
Scarano, Antonio
author_sort Carinci, Francesco
collection PubMed
description The bacterial biofilm formation in the oral cavity and the microbial activity around the implant tissue represent a potential factor on the interface between bone and implant fixture that could induce an inflammatory phenomenon and generate an increased risk for mucositis and peri-implantitis. The aim of the present clinical trial was to investigate the bacterial quality of a new antibacterial coating of the internal chamber of the implant in vivo at six months. The PIXIT implant (Edierre srl, Genova Italy) is prepared by coating the implant with an alcoholic solution containing polysiloxane oligomers and chlorhexidine gluconate at 1%. A total of 15 healthy patients (60 implants) with non-contributory past medical history (nine women and six men, all non-smokers, mean age of 53 years, ranging from 45–61 years) were scheduled to receive bilateral fixed prostheses or crown restorations supported by an implant fixture. No adverse effects and no implant failure were reported at four months. All experimental sites showed a good soft tissue healing at the experimental point times and no local evidence of inflammation was observed. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analysis on coated and uncoated implants showed a decrease of the bacterial count in the internal part of the implant chamber. The mean of total bacteria loading (TBL) detected in each PCR reaction was lower in treated implants (81,038 units/reaction) compared to untreated implants (90,057 units/reaction) (p < 0.01). The polymeric chlorhexydine coating of the internal chamber of the implant showed the ability to control the bacterial loading at the level of the peri-implant tissue. Moreover, the investigation demonstrated that the coating is able to influence also the quality of the microbiota, in particular on the species involved in the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis that are involved with a higher risk of long-term failure of the dental implant restoration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6720572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67205722019-09-10 A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating Carinci, Francesco Lauritano, Dorina Bignozzi, Carlo Alberto Pazzi, Daniele Candotto, Valentina Santos de Oliveira, Paulo Scarano, Antonio Int J Mol Sci Article The bacterial biofilm formation in the oral cavity and the microbial activity around the implant tissue represent a potential factor on the interface between bone and implant fixture that could induce an inflammatory phenomenon and generate an increased risk for mucositis and peri-implantitis. The aim of the present clinical trial was to investigate the bacterial quality of a new antibacterial coating of the internal chamber of the implant in vivo at six months. The PIXIT implant (Edierre srl, Genova Italy) is prepared by coating the implant with an alcoholic solution containing polysiloxane oligomers and chlorhexidine gluconate at 1%. A total of 15 healthy patients (60 implants) with non-contributory past medical history (nine women and six men, all non-smokers, mean age of 53 years, ranging from 45–61 years) were scheduled to receive bilateral fixed prostheses or crown restorations supported by an implant fixture. No adverse effects and no implant failure were reported at four months. All experimental sites showed a good soft tissue healing at the experimental point times and no local evidence of inflammation was observed. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analysis on coated and uncoated implants showed a decrease of the bacterial count in the internal part of the implant chamber. The mean of total bacteria loading (TBL) detected in each PCR reaction was lower in treated implants (81,038 units/reaction) compared to untreated implants (90,057 units/reaction) (p < 0.01). The polymeric chlorhexydine coating of the internal chamber of the implant showed the ability to control the bacterial loading at the level of the peri-implant tissue. Moreover, the investigation demonstrated that the coating is able to influence also the quality of the microbiota, in particular on the species involved in the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis that are involved with a higher risk of long-term failure of the dental implant restoration. MDPI 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6720572/ /pubmed/31405061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163897 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Carinci, Francesco
Lauritano, Dorina
Bignozzi, Carlo Alberto
Pazzi, Daniele
Candotto, Valentina
Santos de Oliveira, Paulo
Scarano, Antonio
A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating
title A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating
title_full A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating
title_fullStr A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating
title_full_unstemmed A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating
title_short A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating
title_sort new strategy against peri-implantitis: antibacterial internal coating
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31405061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20163897
work_keys_str_mv AT carincifrancesco anewstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT lauritanodorina anewstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT bignozzicarloalberto anewstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT pazzidaniele anewstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT candottovalentina anewstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT santosdeoliveirapaulo anewstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT scaranoantonio anewstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT carincifrancesco newstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT lauritanodorina newstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT bignozzicarloalberto newstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT pazzidaniele newstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT candottovalentina newstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT santosdeoliveirapaulo newstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating
AT scaranoantonio newstrategyagainstperiimplantitisantibacterialinternalcoating