Cargando…
Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle tracking echocardiography seems to be an important additive method for evaluation of LV function with improved reprodu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-019-0168-9 |
_version_ | 1783448226230173696 |
---|---|
author | Karlsen, Sigve Dahlslett, Thomas Grenne, Bjørnar Sjøli, Benthe Smiseth, Otto Edvardsen, Thor Brunvand, Harald |
author_facet | Karlsen, Sigve Dahlslett, Thomas Grenne, Bjørnar Sjøli, Benthe Smiseth, Otto Edvardsen, Thor Brunvand, Harald |
author_sort | Karlsen, Sigve |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle tracking echocardiography seems to be an important additive method for evaluation of LV function with improved reproducibility compared with LVEF. Our aim was to compare reproducibility of GLS and LVEF between an expert and trainee both as echocardiographic examiner and analyst. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) underwent echocardiographic examination by both an expert echocardiographer and a trainee. Both echocardiographers, blinded for clinical data and each other’s findings, performed image analysis for evaluation of intra- and inter- observer variability. GLS was measured using speckle tracking echocardiography. LVEF was calculated by Simpson’s biplane method. RESULTS: The trainee measured a GLS of − 19.4% (±3.5%) and expert − 18.7% (±3.2%) with an Intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.89 (0.74–0.95). LVEF by trainee was 50.3% (±8.2%) and by expert 53.6% (±8.6%), ICC coefficient was 0.63 (0.32–0.80). For GLS the systematic difference was 0.21% (− 4.58–2.64) vs. 4.08% (− 20.78–12.62) for LVEF. CONCLUSION: GLS is a more reproducible method for evaluation of LV function than LVEF regardless of echocardiographic training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6720884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67208842019-09-06 Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training Karlsen, Sigve Dahlslett, Thomas Grenne, Bjørnar Sjøli, Benthe Smiseth, Otto Edvardsen, Thor Brunvand, Harald Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle tracking echocardiography seems to be an important additive method for evaluation of LV function with improved reproducibility compared with LVEF. Our aim was to compare reproducibility of GLS and LVEF between an expert and trainee both as echocardiographic examiner and analyst. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) underwent echocardiographic examination by both an expert echocardiographer and a trainee. Both echocardiographers, blinded for clinical data and each other’s findings, performed image analysis for evaluation of intra- and inter- observer variability. GLS was measured using speckle tracking echocardiography. LVEF was calculated by Simpson’s biplane method. RESULTS: The trainee measured a GLS of − 19.4% (±3.5%) and expert − 18.7% (±3.2%) with an Intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.89 (0.74–0.95). LVEF by trainee was 50.3% (±8.2%) and by expert 53.6% (±8.6%), ICC coefficient was 0.63 (0.32–0.80). For GLS the systematic difference was 0.21% (− 4.58–2.64) vs. 4.08% (− 20.78–12.62) for LVEF. CONCLUSION: GLS is a more reproducible method for evaluation of LV function than LVEF regardless of echocardiographic training. BioMed Central 2019-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6720884/ /pubmed/31477137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-019-0168-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Karlsen, Sigve Dahlslett, Thomas Grenne, Bjørnar Sjøli, Benthe Smiseth, Otto Edvardsen, Thor Brunvand, Harald Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training |
title | Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training |
title_full | Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training |
title_fullStr | Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training |
title_full_unstemmed | Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training |
title_short | Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training |
title_sort | global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31477137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12947-019-0168-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karlsensigve globallongitudinalstrainisamorereproduciblemeasureofleftventricularfunctionthanejectionfractionregardlessofechocardiographictraining AT dahlslettthomas globallongitudinalstrainisamorereproduciblemeasureofleftventricularfunctionthanejectionfractionregardlessofechocardiographictraining AT grennebjørnar globallongitudinalstrainisamorereproduciblemeasureofleftventricularfunctionthanejectionfractionregardlessofechocardiographictraining AT sjølibenthe globallongitudinalstrainisamorereproduciblemeasureofleftventricularfunctionthanejectionfractionregardlessofechocardiographictraining AT smisethotto globallongitudinalstrainisamorereproduciblemeasureofleftventricularfunctionthanejectionfractionregardlessofechocardiographictraining AT edvardsenthor globallongitudinalstrainisamorereproduciblemeasureofleftventricularfunctionthanejectionfractionregardlessofechocardiographictraining AT brunvandharald globallongitudinalstrainisamorereproduciblemeasureofleftventricularfunctionthanejectionfractionregardlessofechocardiographictraining |