Cargando…
Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA
Diabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aim...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31434217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162989 |
_version_ | 1783448240576790528 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Hong Bhurke, Sheetal Jia, Guizhen Song, Fujian |
author_facet | Fan, Hong Bhurke, Sheetal Jia, Guizhen Song, Fujian |
author_sort | Fan, Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aims to describe the characteristics of diabetes research conducted in China and the USA. The study included 800 studies on diabetes mellitus from both countries. Compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were more likely to be laboratory-based primary research (50.5% versus 30.8%), more likely to use animal subjects (47% versus 27.5%), more likely to focused on risk factors (22.7% versus. 14.7%), more likely to be case-controlled studies (17.7% versus 10.0%), and more likely to evaluate pharmacological treatments (36.5% versus 20.7%). Further, compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were less likely to involve patients (42.7% versus 60.7%), less likely to be clinical trials (6.2% versus 14.5%), less likely to be cohort studies (8.8% versus. 26.0%), and less likely to evaluate disease management interventions (3.3% versus 13.3%). Clinical studies in China should be more patient-based to facilitate more effective control and management of diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6720953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67209532019-09-10 Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA Fan, Hong Bhurke, Sheetal Jia, Guizhen Song, Fujian Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Diabetes mellitus is one of the major non-communicable diseases (NCD) with increasing prevalence in China. There is a lack of high-quality research focusing on prevention and management of diabetes in low and middle income countries (LMICs) compared to developed countries. This comparative study aims to describe the characteristics of diabetes research conducted in China and the USA. The study included 800 studies on diabetes mellitus from both countries. Compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were more likely to be laboratory-based primary research (50.5% versus 30.8%), more likely to use animal subjects (47% versus 27.5%), more likely to focused on risk factors (22.7% versus. 14.7%), more likely to be case-controlled studies (17.7% versus 10.0%), and more likely to evaluate pharmacological treatments (36.5% versus 20.7%). Further, compared with studies in the USA, studies in China were less likely to involve patients (42.7% versus 60.7%), less likely to be clinical trials (6.2% versus 14.5%), less likely to be cohort studies (8.8% versus. 26.0%), and less likely to evaluate disease management interventions (3.3% versus 13.3%). Clinical studies in China should be more patient-based to facilitate more effective control and management of diabetes. MDPI 2019-08-20 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6720953/ /pubmed/31434217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162989 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fan, Hong Bhurke, Sheetal Jia, Guizhen Song, Fujian Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title | Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_full | Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_fullStr | Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_short | Differences and Similarities in Diabetes Research between China and the USA |
title_sort | differences and similarities in diabetes research between china and the usa |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6720953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31434217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanhong differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa AT bhurkesheetal differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa AT jiaguizhen differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa AT songfujian differencesandsimilaritiesindiabetesresearchbetweenchinaandtheusa |