Cargando…

Responses of Pigs of Different Genotypes to a Variation in the Dietary Indispensable Amino Acid Content in Terms of Their Growth, and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The aim of the experiment was to study the response of pigs of different genotypes to a variation in their dietary amino acid allowance. Ninety-six crossbred barrows of two lean paternal genetic lines (Hypor Maxter and PIC 337) were housed in eight pens from body weight 60 to 145 kg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schiavon, Stefano, Dalla Bona, Mirco, Carcò, Giuseppe, Sturaro, Enrico, Gallo, Luigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31370307
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9080508
_version_ 1783448258502197248
author Schiavon, Stefano
Dalla Bona, Mirco
Carcò, Giuseppe
Sturaro, Enrico
Gallo, Luigi
author_facet Schiavon, Stefano
Dalla Bona, Mirco
Carcò, Giuseppe
Sturaro, Enrico
Gallo, Luigi
author_sort Schiavon, Stefano
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The aim of the experiment was to study the response of pigs of different genotypes to a variation in their dietary amino acid allowance. Ninety-six crossbred barrows of two lean paternal genetic lines (Hypor Maxter and PIC 337) were housed in eight pens from body weight 60 to 145 kg and fed quasi ad libitum on feeds with either high or low ileal digestible indispensable amino acid contents. The high and low amino acid feeds were formulated to have the same standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine, methionine, tryptophan and threonine contents per unit of crude protein, but provided 9.4 to 8.0 (assumed to be non-limiting) or 8.5 to 6.5 (close to National Research Council recommendations) g/kg of SID lysine, respectively. The low amino acid feed reduced the estimated N excretion compared with the high, without affecting growth, carcass yield, carcass anatomical composition and meat quality traits. Genetic line had trivial effects and the amino acid level × genotype interaction was never significant. We concluded that the two pig genotypes did not differ sufficiently in growth potential and leanness to respond differently. ABSTRACT: We studied the response of pigs from two crossbred genetic lines (GL) in the 60 to 145 kg body weight interval to a variation in the indispensable amino acid (AA) content of their feed. Ninety-six barrows of two paternal GLs (Hypor Maxter and PIC 337) were housed in eight pens and fed quasi ad libitum on feeds differing in their standardized ileal digestible (SID) indispensable AA contents. Pigs in four pens received feeds containing 9.4 to 8.0 g/kg of SID Lys (HAA), considered non-limiting, while the others received feeds containing 8.5 to 6.5 g/kg of SID Lys (LAA). The two feeds had identical indispensable lysine, methionine, tryptophan and threonine contents per unit of crude protein (CP). Feed intake, growth, carcass weight, and the weights of the lean and fat cuts were recorded, and samples of longissimus lumborum were analyzed. Data were analyzed using a two-way factorial mixed model. The LAA feed lowered the estimated N excretion (p < 0.001) compared with HAA, without affecting growth, carcass or meat quality traits. Genetic line had trivial effects and the AA level × genotype interaction was never significant. The two pig genotypes did not differ sufficiently in growth potential and leanness to respond differently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6721042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67210422019-09-10 Responses of Pigs of Different Genotypes to a Variation in the Dietary Indispensable Amino Acid Content in Terms of Their Growth, and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits Schiavon, Stefano Dalla Bona, Mirco Carcò, Giuseppe Sturaro, Enrico Gallo, Luigi Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The aim of the experiment was to study the response of pigs of different genotypes to a variation in their dietary amino acid allowance. Ninety-six crossbred barrows of two lean paternal genetic lines (Hypor Maxter and PIC 337) were housed in eight pens from body weight 60 to 145 kg and fed quasi ad libitum on feeds with either high or low ileal digestible indispensable amino acid contents. The high and low amino acid feeds were formulated to have the same standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine, methionine, tryptophan and threonine contents per unit of crude protein, but provided 9.4 to 8.0 (assumed to be non-limiting) or 8.5 to 6.5 (close to National Research Council recommendations) g/kg of SID lysine, respectively. The low amino acid feed reduced the estimated N excretion compared with the high, without affecting growth, carcass yield, carcass anatomical composition and meat quality traits. Genetic line had trivial effects and the amino acid level × genotype interaction was never significant. We concluded that the two pig genotypes did not differ sufficiently in growth potential and leanness to respond differently. ABSTRACT: We studied the response of pigs from two crossbred genetic lines (GL) in the 60 to 145 kg body weight interval to a variation in the indispensable amino acid (AA) content of their feed. Ninety-six barrows of two paternal GLs (Hypor Maxter and PIC 337) were housed in eight pens and fed quasi ad libitum on feeds differing in their standardized ileal digestible (SID) indispensable AA contents. Pigs in four pens received feeds containing 9.4 to 8.0 g/kg of SID Lys (HAA), considered non-limiting, while the others received feeds containing 8.5 to 6.5 g/kg of SID Lys (LAA). The two feeds had identical indispensable lysine, methionine, tryptophan and threonine contents per unit of crude protein (CP). Feed intake, growth, carcass weight, and the weights of the lean and fat cuts were recorded, and samples of longissimus lumborum were analyzed. Data were analyzed using a two-way factorial mixed model. The LAA feed lowered the estimated N excretion (p < 0.001) compared with HAA, without affecting growth, carcass or meat quality traits. Genetic line had trivial effects and the AA level × genotype interaction was never significant. The two pig genotypes did not differ sufficiently in growth potential and leanness to respond differently. MDPI 2019-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6721042/ /pubmed/31370307 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9080508 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schiavon, Stefano
Dalla Bona, Mirco
Carcò, Giuseppe
Sturaro, Enrico
Gallo, Luigi
Responses of Pigs of Different Genotypes to a Variation in the Dietary Indispensable Amino Acid Content in Terms of Their Growth, and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits
title Responses of Pigs of Different Genotypes to a Variation in the Dietary Indispensable Amino Acid Content in Terms of Their Growth, and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits
title_full Responses of Pigs of Different Genotypes to a Variation in the Dietary Indispensable Amino Acid Content in Terms of Their Growth, and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits
title_fullStr Responses of Pigs of Different Genotypes to a Variation in the Dietary Indispensable Amino Acid Content in Terms of Their Growth, and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits
title_full_unstemmed Responses of Pigs of Different Genotypes to a Variation in the Dietary Indispensable Amino Acid Content in Terms of Their Growth, and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits
title_short Responses of Pigs of Different Genotypes to a Variation in the Dietary Indispensable Amino Acid Content in Terms of Their Growth, and Carcass and Meat Quality Traits
title_sort responses of pigs of different genotypes to a variation in the dietary indispensable amino acid content in terms of their growth, and carcass and meat quality traits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31370307
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9080508
work_keys_str_mv AT schiavonstefano responsesofpigsofdifferentgenotypestoavariationinthedietaryindispensableaminoacidcontentintermsoftheirgrowthandcarcassandmeatqualitytraits
AT dallabonamirco responsesofpigsofdifferentgenotypestoavariationinthedietaryindispensableaminoacidcontentintermsoftheirgrowthandcarcassandmeatqualitytraits
AT carcogiuseppe responsesofpigsofdifferentgenotypestoavariationinthedietaryindispensableaminoacidcontentintermsoftheirgrowthandcarcassandmeatqualitytraits
AT sturaroenrico responsesofpigsofdifferentgenotypestoavariationinthedietaryindispensableaminoacidcontentintermsoftheirgrowthandcarcassandmeatqualitytraits
AT galloluigi responsesofpigsofdifferentgenotypestoavariationinthedietaryindispensableaminoacidcontentintermsoftheirgrowthandcarcassandmeatqualitytraits