Cargando…
“It’s a matter of building bridges…” – feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness
BACKGROUND: Family and friends (carer) involvement in the treatment of people with mental illness is widely recommended. However, the implementation remains poor, especially during hospital treatment, where carers report being excluded from care decisions. METHODS: We developed structured clinical p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2257-6 |
_version_ | 1783448269054017536 |
---|---|
author | Kaselionyte, Justina Conneely, Maev Giacco, Domenico |
author_facet | Kaselionyte, Justina Conneely, Maev Giacco, Domenico |
author_sort | Kaselionyte, Justina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Family and friends (carer) involvement in the treatment of people with mental illness is widely recommended. However, the implementation remains poor, especially during hospital treatment, where carers report being excluded from care decisions. METHODS: We developed structured clinical procedures to maximise carer involvement in inpatient treatment. The aim of this study was to test their feasibility across four inpatient wards in East London and explore experiences of the participants. The intervention was delivered by clinicians (social therapists, nurses and psychiatrists) who were trained by the research team. Thirty patients and thirty carers received the intervention and completed research assessments and qualitative interviews after the intervention. 80% of the patients were followed up after six weeks of admission to complete quantitative questionnaires. Six clinicians were interviewed to explore their views on the intervention. Thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. RESULTS: The intervention was found to be feasible to be delivered within the first week of admission in more than a half of the patients (53%) who provided consent. The main reasons why the interventions was not delivered in the remaining 47% of patients included staff or carers not being available, withdrawal of consent from the patient or patient being discharged prior to the intervention. Two themes were identified through thematic analysis. The first captured participant experiences of the intervention as facilitating a three-way collaborative approach to treatment. The second covered how patients’ mental states and practicalities of inpatient care acted as barriers and facilitators to the intervention being implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Carer involvement in hospital treatment for mental illness is more difficult to implement than is commonly thought. This study has shown that a simple structured approach can facilitate a trialogue and that patients, clinicians and carers appreciate this approach to care. Our intervention provides clear and simple manualised clinical procedures that clinicians can follow. However, even the implementation of such procedures may be challenging in the absence of wider organisational support. The involvement of senior managers and clinical leaders might play a key role in overcoming barriers and support front-line clinicians to prioritise and implement carer involvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6721093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67210932019-09-10 “It’s a matter of building bridges…” – feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness Kaselionyte, Justina Conneely, Maev Giacco, Domenico BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Family and friends (carer) involvement in the treatment of people with mental illness is widely recommended. However, the implementation remains poor, especially during hospital treatment, where carers report being excluded from care decisions. METHODS: We developed structured clinical procedures to maximise carer involvement in inpatient treatment. The aim of this study was to test their feasibility across four inpatient wards in East London and explore experiences of the participants. The intervention was delivered by clinicians (social therapists, nurses and psychiatrists) who were trained by the research team. Thirty patients and thirty carers received the intervention and completed research assessments and qualitative interviews after the intervention. 80% of the patients were followed up after six weeks of admission to complete quantitative questionnaires. Six clinicians were interviewed to explore their views on the intervention. Thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. RESULTS: The intervention was found to be feasible to be delivered within the first week of admission in more than a half of the patients (53%) who provided consent. The main reasons why the interventions was not delivered in the remaining 47% of patients included staff or carers not being available, withdrawal of consent from the patient or patient being discharged prior to the intervention. Two themes were identified through thematic analysis. The first captured participant experiences of the intervention as facilitating a three-way collaborative approach to treatment. The second covered how patients’ mental states and practicalities of inpatient care acted as barriers and facilitators to the intervention being implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Carer involvement in hospital treatment for mental illness is more difficult to implement than is commonly thought. This study has shown that a simple structured approach can facilitate a trialogue and that patients, clinicians and carers appreciate this approach to care. Our intervention provides clear and simple manualised clinical procedures that clinicians can follow. However, even the implementation of such procedures may be challenging in the absence of wider organisational support. The involvement of senior managers and clinical leaders might play a key role in overcoming barriers and support front-line clinicians to prioritise and implement carer involvement. BioMed Central 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6721093/ /pubmed/31481057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2257-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaselionyte, Justina Conneely, Maev Giacco, Domenico “It’s a matter of building bridges…” – feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness |
title | “It’s a matter of building bridges…” – feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness |
title_full | “It’s a matter of building bridges…” – feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness |
title_fullStr | “It’s a matter of building bridges…” – feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness |
title_full_unstemmed | “It’s a matter of building bridges…” – feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness |
title_short | “It’s a matter of building bridges…” – feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness |
title_sort | “it’s a matter of building bridges…” – feasibility of a carer involvement intervention for inpatients with severe mental illness |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2257-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaselionytejustina itsamatterofbuildingbridgesfeasibilityofacarerinvolvementinterventionforinpatientswithseverementalillness AT conneelymaev itsamatterofbuildingbridgesfeasibilityofacarerinvolvementinterventionforinpatientswithseverementalillness AT giaccodomenico itsamatterofbuildingbridgesfeasibilityofacarerinvolvementinterventionforinpatientswithseverementalillness |