Cargando…

Sensor Configuration and Algorithms for Power-Line Interference Suppression in Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Low field (LF) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) shows potential advantages to study pure heteronuclear J-coupling and observe the fine structure of matter. Power-line harmonics interferences and fixed-frequency noise peaks might introduce discrete noise peaks into the LF-NMR spectrum in an open envi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Xiaolei, Dong, Hui, Tao, Quan, Yu, Mengmeng, Li, Yongqiang, Rong, Liangliang, Krause, Hans-Joachim, Offenhäusser, Andreas, Xie, Xiaoming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19163566
_version_ 1783448279776755712
author Huang, Xiaolei
Dong, Hui
Tao, Quan
Yu, Mengmeng
Li, Yongqiang
Rong, Liangliang
Krause, Hans-Joachim
Offenhäusser, Andreas
Xie, Xiaoming
author_facet Huang, Xiaolei
Dong, Hui
Tao, Quan
Yu, Mengmeng
Li, Yongqiang
Rong, Liangliang
Krause, Hans-Joachim
Offenhäusser, Andreas
Xie, Xiaoming
author_sort Huang, Xiaolei
collection PubMed
description Low field (LF) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) shows potential advantages to study pure heteronuclear J-coupling and observe the fine structure of matter. Power-line harmonics interferences and fixed-frequency noise peaks might introduce discrete noise peaks into the LF-NMR spectrum in an open environment or in a conductively shielded room, which might disturb J-coupling spectra of matter recorded at LF. In this paper, we describe a multi-channel sensor configuration of superconducting quantum interference devices, and measure the multiple peaks of the 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol J-coupling spectrum. For the case of low signal to noise ratio (SNR) < 1, we suggest two noise suppression algorithms using discrete wavelet analysis (DWA), combined with either least squares method (LSM) or gradient descent (GD). The de-noising methods are based on spatial correlation of the interferences among the superconducting sensors, and are experimentally demonstrated. The DWA-LSM algorithm shows a significant effect in the noise reduction and recovers SNR > 1 for most of the signal peaks. The DWA-GD algorithm improves the SNR further, but takes more computational time. Depending on whether the accuracy or the speed of the de-noising process is more important in LF-NMR applications, the choice of algorithm should be made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6721142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67211422019-09-10 Sensor Configuration and Algorithms for Power-Line Interference Suppression in Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Huang, Xiaolei Dong, Hui Tao, Quan Yu, Mengmeng Li, Yongqiang Rong, Liangliang Krause, Hans-Joachim Offenhäusser, Andreas Xie, Xiaoming Sensors (Basel) Article Low field (LF) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) shows potential advantages to study pure heteronuclear J-coupling and observe the fine structure of matter. Power-line harmonics interferences and fixed-frequency noise peaks might introduce discrete noise peaks into the LF-NMR spectrum in an open environment or in a conductively shielded room, which might disturb J-coupling spectra of matter recorded at LF. In this paper, we describe a multi-channel sensor configuration of superconducting quantum interference devices, and measure the multiple peaks of the 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol J-coupling spectrum. For the case of low signal to noise ratio (SNR) < 1, we suggest two noise suppression algorithms using discrete wavelet analysis (DWA), combined with either least squares method (LSM) or gradient descent (GD). The de-noising methods are based on spatial correlation of the interferences among the superconducting sensors, and are experimentally demonstrated. The DWA-LSM algorithm shows a significant effect in the noise reduction and recovers SNR > 1 for most of the signal peaks. The DWA-GD algorithm improves the SNR further, but takes more computational time. Depending on whether the accuracy or the speed of the de-noising process is more important in LF-NMR applications, the choice of algorithm should be made. MDPI 2019-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6721142/ /pubmed/31443310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19163566 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Xiaolei
Dong, Hui
Tao, Quan
Yu, Mengmeng
Li, Yongqiang
Rong, Liangliang
Krause, Hans-Joachim
Offenhäusser, Andreas
Xie, Xiaoming
Sensor Configuration and Algorithms for Power-Line Interference Suppression in Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
title Sensor Configuration and Algorithms for Power-Line Interference Suppression in Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
title_full Sensor Configuration and Algorithms for Power-Line Interference Suppression in Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
title_fullStr Sensor Configuration and Algorithms for Power-Line Interference Suppression in Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
title_full_unstemmed Sensor Configuration and Algorithms for Power-Line Interference Suppression in Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
title_short Sensor Configuration and Algorithms for Power-Line Interference Suppression in Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
title_sort sensor configuration and algorithms for power-line interference suppression in low field nuclear magnetic resonance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31443310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19163566
work_keys_str_mv AT huangxiaolei sensorconfigurationandalgorithmsforpowerlineinterferencesuppressioninlowfieldnuclearmagneticresonance
AT donghui sensorconfigurationandalgorithmsforpowerlineinterferencesuppressioninlowfieldnuclearmagneticresonance
AT taoquan sensorconfigurationandalgorithmsforpowerlineinterferencesuppressioninlowfieldnuclearmagneticresonance
AT yumengmeng sensorconfigurationandalgorithmsforpowerlineinterferencesuppressioninlowfieldnuclearmagneticresonance
AT liyongqiang sensorconfigurationandalgorithmsforpowerlineinterferencesuppressioninlowfieldnuclearmagneticresonance
AT rongliangliang sensorconfigurationandalgorithmsforpowerlineinterferencesuppressioninlowfieldnuclearmagneticresonance
AT krausehansjoachim sensorconfigurationandalgorithmsforpowerlineinterferencesuppressioninlowfieldnuclearmagneticresonance
AT offenhausserandreas sensorconfigurationandalgorithmsforpowerlineinterferencesuppressioninlowfieldnuclearmagneticresonance
AT xiexiaoming sensorconfigurationandalgorithmsforpowerlineinterferencesuppressioninlowfieldnuclearmagneticresonance