Cargando…
Immunotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Present Status and Future Strategies
Although classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is usually curable, 20–30% of the patients experience treatment failure and most of them are typically treated with salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). However, 45–55% of that subset further relapse or progress despite in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081071 |
_version_ | 1783448326945898496 |
---|---|
author | Vassilakopoulos, Theodoros P. Chatzidimitriou, Chrysovalantou Asimakopoulos, John V. Arapaki, Maria Tzoras, Evangelos Angelopoulou, Maria K. Konstantopoulos, Kostas |
author_facet | Vassilakopoulos, Theodoros P. Chatzidimitriou, Chrysovalantou Asimakopoulos, John V. Arapaki, Maria Tzoras, Evangelos Angelopoulou, Maria K. Konstantopoulos, Kostas |
author_sort | Vassilakopoulos, Theodoros P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is usually curable, 20–30% of the patients experience treatment failure and most of them are typically treated with salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). However, 45–55% of that subset further relapse or progress despite intensive treatment. At the advanced stage of the disease course, recently developed immunotherapeutic approaches have provided very promising results with prolonged remissions or disease stabilization in many patients. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) has been approved for patients with relapsed/refractory cHL (rr-cHL) who have failed autoSCT, as a consolidation after autoSCT in high-risk patients, as well as for patients who are ineligible for autoSCT or multiagent chemotherapy who have failed ≥ two treatment lines. However, except of the consolidation setting, 90–95% of the patients will progress and require further treatment. In this clinical setting, immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have produced impressive results. Both nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been approved for rr-cHL after autoSCT and BV failure, while pembrolizumab has also been licensed for transplant ineligible patients after BV failure. Other CPIs, sintilimab and tislelizumab, have been successfully tested in China, albeit in less heavily pretreated populations. Recent data suggest that the efficacy of CPIs may be augmented by hypomethylating agents, such as decitabine. As a result of their success in heavily pretreated disease, BV and CPIs are moving to earlier lines of treatment. BV was recently licensed by the FDA for the first-line treatment of stage III/IV Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in combination with AVD (only stage IV according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA)). CPIs are currently being evaluated in combination with AVD in phase II trials of first-line treatment. The impact of BV and CPIs was also investigated in the setting of second-line salvage therapy. Finally, combinations of targeted therapies are under evaluation. Based on these exciting results, it appears reasonable to predict that an improvement in survival and a potential increase in the cure rates of cHL will soon become evident. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6721364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67213642019-09-10 Immunotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Present Status and Future Strategies Vassilakopoulos, Theodoros P. Chatzidimitriou, Chrysovalantou Asimakopoulos, John V. Arapaki, Maria Tzoras, Evangelos Angelopoulou, Maria K. Konstantopoulos, Kostas Cancers (Basel) Review Although classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is usually curable, 20–30% of the patients experience treatment failure and most of them are typically treated with salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). However, 45–55% of that subset further relapse or progress despite intensive treatment. At the advanced stage of the disease course, recently developed immunotherapeutic approaches have provided very promising results with prolonged remissions or disease stabilization in many patients. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) has been approved for patients with relapsed/refractory cHL (rr-cHL) who have failed autoSCT, as a consolidation after autoSCT in high-risk patients, as well as for patients who are ineligible for autoSCT or multiagent chemotherapy who have failed ≥ two treatment lines. However, except of the consolidation setting, 90–95% of the patients will progress and require further treatment. In this clinical setting, immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have produced impressive results. Both nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been approved for rr-cHL after autoSCT and BV failure, while pembrolizumab has also been licensed for transplant ineligible patients after BV failure. Other CPIs, sintilimab and tislelizumab, have been successfully tested in China, albeit in less heavily pretreated populations. Recent data suggest that the efficacy of CPIs may be augmented by hypomethylating agents, such as decitabine. As a result of their success in heavily pretreated disease, BV and CPIs are moving to earlier lines of treatment. BV was recently licensed by the FDA for the first-line treatment of stage III/IV Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in combination with AVD (only stage IV according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA)). CPIs are currently being evaluated in combination with AVD in phase II trials of first-line treatment. The impact of BV and CPIs was also investigated in the setting of second-line salvage therapy. Finally, combinations of targeted therapies are under evaluation. Based on these exciting results, it appears reasonable to predict that an improvement in survival and a potential increase in the cure rates of cHL will soon become evident. MDPI 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6721364/ /pubmed/31362369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081071 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Vassilakopoulos, Theodoros P. Chatzidimitriou, Chrysovalantou Asimakopoulos, John V. Arapaki, Maria Tzoras, Evangelos Angelopoulou, Maria K. Konstantopoulos, Kostas Immunotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Present Status and Future Strategies |
title | Immunotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Present Status and Future Strategies |
title_full | Immunotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Present Status and Future Strategies |
title_fullStr | Immunotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Present Status and Future Strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Present Status and Future Strategies |
title_short | Immunotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Present Status and Future Strategies |
title_sort | immunotherapy in hodgkin lymphoma: present status and future strategies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vassilakopoulostheodorosp immunotherapyinhodgkinlymphomapresentstatusandfuturestrategies AT chatzidimitriouchrysovalantou immunotherapyinhodgkinlymphomapresentstatusandfuturestrategies AT asimakopoulosjohnv immunotherapyinhodgkinlymphomapresentstatusandfuturestrategies AT arapakimaria immunotherapyinhodgkinlymphomapresentstatusandfuturestrategies AT tzorasevangelos immunotherapyinhodgkinlymphomapresentstatusandfuturestrategies AT angelopouloumariak immunotherapyinhodgkinlymphomapresentstatusandfuturestrategies AT konstantopouloskostas immunotherapyinhodgkinlymphomapresentstatusandfuturestrategies |