Cargando…

Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma—History and Future

Background: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy among adults. It is, nevertheless, a rare disease, with an incidence of approximately one case per 100,000 individuals per year in Europe. Approximately half of tumors will eventually metastasize, and the liver is the organ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schank, Timo E., Hassel, Jessica C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081048
_version_ 1783448342722772992
author Schank, Timo E.
Hassel, Jessica C.
author_facet Schank, Timo E.
Hassel, Jessica C.
author_sort Schank, Timo E.
collection PubMed
description Background: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy among adults. It is, nevertheless, a rare disease, with an incidence of approximately one case per 100,000 individuals per year in Europe. Approximately half of tumors will eventually metastasize, and the liver is the organ usually affected. No standard-of-care treatment exists for metastasized uveal melanoma. Chemotherapies or liver-directed treatments do not usually result in long-term tumor control. Immunotherapies are currently the most promising therapy option available. Methods: We reviewed both relevant recent literature on PubMed concerning the treatment of uveal melanoma with immunotherapies, and currently investigated drugs on ClinicalTrials.gov. Our own experiences with immune checkpoint blockers are included in a case series of 20 patients. Results: Because few clinical trials have been conducted for metastasized uveal melanoma, no definitive treatment strategy exists for this rare disease. The outcomes of most immunotherapies are poor, especially compared with cutaneous melanoma. However, encouraging results have been found for some very recently investigated agents such as the bispecific tebentafusp, for which a remarkably increased one-year overall survival rate, and similarly increased disease control rate, were observed in early phase studies. Conclusions: The treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma remains challenging, and almost all patients still die from the disease. Long-term responses might be achievable by means of new immunological strategies. Patients should therefore be referred to large medical centers where they can take part in controlled clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6721437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67214372019-09-10 Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma—History and Future Schank, Timo E. Hassel, Jessica C. Cancers (Basel) Review Background: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy among adults. It is, nevertheless, a rare disease, with an incidence of approximately one case per 100,000 individuals per year in Europe. Approximately half of tumors will eventually metastasize, and the liver is the organ usually affected. No standard-of-care treatment exists for metastasized uveal melanoma. Chemotherapies or liver-directed treatments do not usually result in long-term tumor control. Immunotherapies are currently the most promising therapy option available. Methods: We reviewed both relevant recent literature on PubMed concerning the treatment of uveal melanoma with immunotherapies, and currently investigated drugs on ClinicalTrials.gov. Our own experiences with immune checkpoint blockers are included in a case series of 20 patients. Results: Because few clinical trials have been conducted for metastasized uveal melanoma, no definitive treatment strategy exists for this rare disease. The outcomes of most immunotherapies are poor, especially compared with cutaneous melanoma. However, encouraging results have been found for some very recently investigated agents such as the bispecific tebentafusp, for which a remarkably increased one-year overall survival rate, and similarly increased disease control rate, were observed in early phase studies. Conclusions: The treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma remains challenging, and almost all patients still die from the disease. Long-term responses might be achievable by means of new immunological strategies. Patients should therefore be referred to large medical centers where they can take part in controlled clinical studies. MDPI 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6721437/ /pubmed/31344957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081048 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Schank, Timo E.
Hassel, Jessica C.
Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma—History and Future
title Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma—History and Future
title_full Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma—History and Future
title_fullStr Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma—History and Future
title_full_unstemmed Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma—History and Future
title_short Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma—History and Future
title_sort immunotherapies for the treatment of uveal melanoma—history and future
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11081048
work_keys_str_mv AT schanktimoe immunotherapiesforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomahistoryandfuture
AT hasseljessicac immunotherapiesforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomahistoryandfuture