Cargando…
The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies
Background Acute care surgery (ACS) models address high volumes of emergency general surgery and emergency room (ER) overcrowding. The impact of ACS service model implementation on the quality and efficiency of care (EOC) outcomes in acute appendicitis (AA) and acute cholecystitis (AC) cohorts was e...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501728 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5036 |
_version_ | 1783448434980683776 |
---|---|
author | Hardy, Krista Metcalfe, Jennifer Clouston, Kathleen Vergis, Ashley |
author_facet | Hardy, Krista Metcalfe, Jennifer Clouston, Kathleen Vergis, Ashley |
author_sort | Hardy, Krista |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Acute care surgery (ACS) models address high volumes of emergency general surgery and emergency room (ER) overcrowding. The impact of ACS service model implementation on the quality and efficiency of care (EOC) outcomes in acute appendicitis (AA) and acute cholecystitis (AC) cohorts was evaluated. Methods A retrospective chart review (N=1,229) of adult AA and AC patients admitted prior to (pre-ACS; n=507; three hospitals; 2007) and after regionalization (R-ACS; n=722; one hospital; 2011). Results R-ACS time to ER physician assessment was significantly longer for AA (3.4 ± 2.3 versus 2.4 ± 2.6 hr; p ≤ 0.001). Surgical response times (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.6 ± 4.3 hr for AA; 1.8 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 5.0 hr for AC; p ≤ 0.0001) and acquisition of imaging (4.1 ± 4.1 vs 6.9 ± 9.9 hr for AA, p ≤ 0.0001; 7.8 ± 1.9 vs 13.2 ± 18.5 hr for AC, p ≤ 0.008) occurred significantly faster with R-ACS. R-ACS resulted in a significant increase in night-time appendectomies (21.7% vs 11.1%; p ≤ 0.002), perforated appendices (29.1 % vs 18.9 %; p ≤ 0.006), 30-day readmissions (4.56% vs 0.82%; p ≤ 0.01), and lower rate of intraoperative complications for AC patients (2.78% vs 7.69%; p ≤ 0.02). Conclusions Despite the increased volume of patients seen with the implementation of R-ACS, surgical assessments and diagnostic imaging were significantly more prompt. EOC measures were maintained. Worse AA outcomes highlight areas for improvement in delivering R-ACS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6721875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67218752019-09-09 The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies Hardy, Krista Metcalfe, Jennifer Clouston, Kathleen Vergis, Ashley Cureus Emergency Medicine Background Acute care surgery (ACS) models address high volumes of emergency general surgery and emergency room (ER) overcrowding. The impact of ACS service model implementation on the quality and efficiency of care (EOC) outcomes in acute appendicitis (AA) and acute cholecystitis (AC) cohorts was evaluated. Methods A retrospective chart review (N=1,229) of adult AA and AC patients admitted prior to (pre-ACS; n=507; three hospitals; 2007) and after regionalization (R-ACS; n=722; one hospital; 2011). Results R-ACS time to ER physician assessment was significantly longer for AA (3.4 ± 2.3 versus 2.4 ± 2.6 hr; p ≤ 0.001). Surgical response times (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.6 ± 4.3 hr for AA; 1.8 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 5.0 hr for AC; p ≤ 0.0001) and acquisition of imaging (4.1 ± 4.1 vs 6.9 ± 9.9 hr for AA, p ≤ 0.0001; 7.8 ± 1.9 vs 13.2 ± 18.5 hr for AC, p ≤ 0.008) occurred significantly faster with R-ACS. R-ACS resulted in a significant increase in night-time appendectomies (21.7% vs 11.1%; p ≤ 0.002), perforated appendices (29.1 % vs 18.9 %; p ≤ 0.006), 30-day readmissions (4.56% vs 0.82%; p ≤ 0.01), and lower rate of intraoperative complications for AC patients (2.78% vs 7.69%; p ≤ 0.02). Conclusions Despite the increased volume of patients seen with the implementation of R-ACS, surgical assessments and diagnostic imaging were significantly more prompt. EOC measures were maintained. Worse AA outcomes highlight areas for improvement in delivering R-ACS. Cureus 2019-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6721875/ /pubmed/31501728 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5036 Text en Copyright © 2019, Hardy et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Hardy, Krista Metcalfe, Jennifer Clouston, Kathleen Vergis, Ashley The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies |
title | The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies |
title_full | The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies |
title_fullStr | The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies |
title_short | The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies |
title_sort | impact of an acute care surgical service on the quality and efficiency of care outcome indicators for patients with general surgical emergencies |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501728 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hardykrista theimpactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies AT metcalfejennifer theimpactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies AT cloustonkathleen theimpactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies AT vergisashley theimpactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies AT hardykrista impactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies AT metcalfejennifer impactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies AT cloustonkathleen impactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies AT vergisashley impactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies |