Cargando…

The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies

Background Acute care surgery (ACS) models address high volumes of emergency general surgery and emergency room (ER) overcrowding. The impact of ACS service model implementation on the quality and efficiency of care (EOC) outcomes in acute appendicitis (AA) and acute cholecystitis (AC) cohorts was e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hardy, Krista, Metcalfe, Jennifer, Clouston, Kathleen, Vergis, Ashley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501728
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5036
_version_ 1783448434980683776
author Hardy, Krista
Metcalfe, Jennifer
Clouston, Kathleen
Vergis, Ashley
author_facet Hardy, Krista
Metcalfe, Jennifer
Clouston, Kathleen
Vergis, Ashley
author_sort Hardy, Krista
collection PubMed
description Background Acute care surgery (ACS) models address high volumes of emergency general surgery and emergency room (ER) overcrowding. The impact of ACS service model implementation on the quality and efficiency of care (EOC) outcomes in acute appendicitis (AA) and acute cholecystitis (AC) cohorts was evaluated. Methods A retrospective chart review (N=1,229) of adult AA and AC patients admitted prior to (pre-ACS; n=507; three hospitals; 2007) and after regionalization (R-ACS; n=722; one hospital; 2011). Results R-ACS time to ER physician assessment was significantly longer for AA (3.4 ± 2.3 versus 2.4 ± 2.6 hr; p ≤ 0.001). Surgical response times (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.6 ± 4.3 hr for AA; 1.8 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 5.0 hr for AC; p ≤ 0.0001) and acquisition of imaging (4.1 ± 4.1 vs 6.9 ± 9.9 hr for AA, p ≤ 0.0001; 7.8 ± 1.9 vs 13.2 ± 18.5 hr for AC, p ≤ 0.008) occurred significantly faster with R-ACS. R-ACS resulted in a significant increase in night-time appendectomies (21.7% vs 11.1%; p ≤ 0.002), perforated appendices (29.1 % vs 18.9 %; p ≤ 0.006), 30-day readmissions (4.56% vs 0.82%; p ≤ 0.01), and lower rate of intraoperative complications for AC patients (2.78% vs 7.69%; p ≤ 0.02). Conclusions Despite the increased volume of patients seen with the implementation of R-ACS, surgical assessments and diagnostic imaging were significantly more prompt. EOC measures were maintained. Worse AA outcomes highlight areas for improvement in delivering R-ACS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6721875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67218752019-09-09 The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies Hardy, Krista Metcalfe, Jennifer Clouston, Kathleen Vergis, Ashley Cureus Emergency Medicine Background Acute care surgery (ACS) models address high volumes of emergency general surgery and emergency room (ER) overcrowding. The impact of ACS service model implementation on the quality and efficiency of care (EOC) outcomes in acute appendicitis (AA) and acute cholecystitis (AC) cohorts was evaluated. Methods A retrospective chart review (N=1,229) of adult AA and AC patients admitted prior to (pre-ACS; n=507; three hospitals; 2007) and after regionalization (R-ACS; n=722; one hospital; 2011). Results R-ACS time to ER physician assessment was significantly longer for AA (3.4 ± 2.3 versus 2.4 ± 2.6 hr; p ≤ 0.001). Surgical response times (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.6 ± 4.3 hr for AA; 1.8 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 5.0 hr for AC; p ≤ 0.0001) and acquisition of imaging (4.1 ± 4.1 vs 6.9 ± 9.9 hr for AA, p ≤ 0.0001; 7.8 ± 1.9 vs 13.2 ± 18.5 hr for AC, p ≤ 0.008) occurred significantly faster with R-ACS. R-ACS resulted in a significant increase in night-time appendectomies (21.7% vs 11.1%; p ≤ 0.002), perforated appendices (29.1 % vs 18.9 %; p ≤ 0.006), 30-day readmissions (4.56% vs 0.82%; p ≤ 0.01), and lower rate of intraoperative complications for AC patients (2.78% vs 7.69%; p ≤ 0.02). Conclusions Despite the increased volume of patients seen with the implementation of R-ACS, surgical assessments and diagnostic imaging were significantly more prompt. EOC measures were maintained. Worse AA outcomes highlight areas for improvement in delivering R-ACS. Cureus 2019-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6721875/ /pubmed/31501728 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5036 Text en Copyright © 2019, Hardy et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Hardy, Krista
Metcalfe, Jennifer
Clouston, Kathleen
Vergis, Ashley
The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies
title The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies
title_full The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies
title_fullStr The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies
title_short The Impact of an Acute Care Surgical Service on the Quality and Efficiency of Care Outcome Indicators for Patients with General Surgical Emergencies
title_sort impact of an acute care surgical service on the quality and efficiency of care outcome indicators for patients with general surgical emergencies
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501728
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5036
work_keys_str_mv AT hardykrista theimpactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies
AT metcalfejennifer theimpactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies
AT cloustonkathleen theimpactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies
AT vergisashley theimpactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies
AT hardykrista impactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies
AT metcalfejennifer impactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies
AT cloustonkathleen impactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies
AT vergisashley impactofanacutecaresurgicalserviceonthequalityandefficiencyofcareoutcomeindicatorsforpatientswithgeneralsurgicalemergencies