Cargando…

2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial

AIMS: The role of laparoscopy in rectal cancer has been questioned. 3D laparoscopic systems are suggested to aid optimal surgical performance but have not been evaluated in advanced procedures. We hypothesised that stereoscopic imaging could improve the performance of laparoscopic total mesorectal e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curtis, N. J., Conti, J. A., Dalton, R., Rockall, T. A., Allison, A. S., Ockrim, J. B., Jourdan, I. C., Torkington, J., Phillips, S., Allison, J., Hanna, G. B., Francis, N. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9
_version_ 1783448476160360448
author Curtis, N. J.
Conti, J. A.
Dalton, R.
Rockall, T. A.
Allison, A. S.
Ockrim, J. B.
Jourdan, I. C.
Torkington, J.
Phillips, S.
Allison, J.
Hanna, G. B.
Francis, N. K.
author_facet Curtis, N. J.
Conti, J. A.
Dalton, R.
Rockall, T. A.
Allison, A. S.
Ockrim, J. B.
Jourdan, I. C.
Torkington, J.
Phillips, S.
Allison, J.
Hanna, G. B.
Francis, N. K.
author_sort Curtis, N. J.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The role of laparoscopy in rectal cancer has been questioned. 3D laparoscopic systems are suggested to aid optimal surgical performance but have not been evaluated in advanced procedures. We hypothesised that stereoscopic imaging could improve the performance of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS: A multicentre developmental randomised controlled trial comparing 2D and 3D laparoscopic TME was performed (ISRCTN59485808). Trial surgeons were colorectal consultants that had completed their TME proficiency curve and underwent stereoscopic visual testing. Patients requiring elective laparoscopic TME with curative intent were centrally randomised (1:1) to 2D or 3D using Karl Storz IMAGE1 S D3-Link™ and 10-mm TIPCAM®1S 3D passive polarising laparoscopic systems. Outcomes were enacted adverse events as assessed by the observational clinical human reliability analysis technique, intraoperative data, 30-day patient outcomes, histopathological specimen assessment and surgeon cognitive load. RESULTS: 88 patients were included. There were no differences in patient or tumour demographics, surgeon stereopsis, case difficulty, cognitive load, operative time, blood loss or conversion between the trial arms. 1377 intraoperative adverse events were identified (median 18 per case, IQR 14–21, range 2–49) with no differences seen between the 2D and 3D arms (18 (95% CI 17–21) vs. 17 (95% CI 16–19), p = 0.437). 3D laparoscopy had non-significantly higher mesorectal fascial plane resections (94 vs. 77%, p = 0.059; OR 0.23 (95% CI 0.05–1.16)) but equal lymph node yield and circumferential margin distance and involvement. 30-day morbidity, anastomotic leak, re-operation, length of stay and readmission rates were equal between the 2D and 3D arms. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of performing multicentre 3D laparoscopic multicentre trials of specialist performed complex procedures is shown. 3D imaging did not alter the number of intraoperative adverse events; however, a potential improvement in mesorectal specimen quality was observed and should form the focus of future 3D laparoscopic TME trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6722156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67221562019-09-19 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial Curtis, N. J. Conti, J. A. Dalton, R. Rockall, T. A. Allison, A. S. Ockrim, J. B. Jourdan, I. C. Torkington, J. Phillips, S. Allison, J. Hanna, G. B. Francis, N. K. Surg Endosc Article AIMS: The role of laparoscopy in rectal cancer has been questioned. 3D laparoscopic systems are suggested to aid optimal surgical performance but have not been evaluated in advanced procedures. We hypothesised that stereoscopic imaging could improve the performance of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS: A multicentre developmental randomised controlled trial comparing 2D and 3D laparoscopic TME was performed (ISRCTN59485808). Trial surgeons were colorectal consultants that had completed their TME proficiency curve and underwent stereoscopic visual testing. Patients requiring elective laparoscopic TME with curative intent were centrally randomised (1:1) to 2D or 3D using Karl Storz IMAGE1 S D3-Link™ and 10-mm TIPCAM®1S 3D passive polarising laparoscopic systems. Outcomes were enacted adverse events as assessed by the observational clinical human reliability analysis technique, intraoperative data, 30-day patient outcomes, histopathological specimen assessment and surgeon cognitive load. RESULTS: 88 patients were included. There were no differences in patient or tumour demographics, surgeon stereopsis, case difficulty, cognitive load, operative time, blood loss or conversion between the trial arms. 1377 intraoperative adverse events were identified (median 18 per case, IQR 14–21, range 2–49) with no differences seen between the 2D and 3D arms (18 (95% CI 17–21) vs. 17 (95% CI 16–19), p = 0.437). 3D laparoscopy had non-significantly higher mesorectal fascial plane resections (94 vs. 77%, p = 0.059; OR 0.23 (95% CI 0.05–1.16)) but equal lymph node yield and circumferential margin distance and involvement. 30-day morbidity, anastomotic leak, re-operation, length of stay and readmission rates were equal between the 2D and 3D arms. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of performing multicentre 3D laparoscopic multicentre trials of specialist performed complex procedures is shown. 3D imaging did not alter the number of intraoperative adverse events; however, a potential improvement in mesorectal specimen quality was observed and should form the focus of future 3D laparoscopic TME trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-01-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6722156/ /pubmed/30656453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Curtis, N. J.
Conti, J. A.
Dalton, R.
Rockall, T. A.
Allison, A. S.
Ockrim, J. B.
Jourdan, I. C.
Torkington, J.
Phillips, S.
Allison, J.
Hanna, G. B.
Francis, N. K.
2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial
title 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_short 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_sort 2d versus 3d laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9
work_keys_str_mv AT curtisnj 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT contija 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daltonr 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rockallta 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT allisonas 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ockrimjb 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jourdanic 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT torkingtonj 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT phillipss 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT allisonj 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hannagb 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT francisnk 2dversus3dlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcisionadevelopmentalmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial