Cargando…

Trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence with mood stabilizers is a major problem that negatively impacts the course of bipolar disorder. Medication adherence is a complex individual behavior, and adherence rates often change over time. This study asked if distinct classes of adherence trajectories with mood stabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bauer, M., Glenn, T., Alda, M., Bauer, R., Grof, P., Marsh, W., Monteith, S., Munoz, R., Rasgon, N., Sagduyu, K., Whybrow, P. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0154-z
_version_ 1783448476858712064
author Bauer, M.
Glenn, T.
Alda, M.
Bauer, R.
Grof, P.
Marsh, W.
Monteith, S.
Munoz, R.
Rasgon, N.
Sagduyu, K.
Whybrow, P. C.
author_facet Bauer, M.
Glenn, T.
Alda, M.
Bauer, R.
Grof, P.
Marsh, W.
Monteith, S.
Munoz, R.
Rasgon, N.
Sagduyu, K.
Whybrow, P. C.
author_sort Bauer, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nonadherence with mood stabilizers is a major problem that negatively impacts the course of bipolar disorder. Medication adherence is a complex individual behavior, and adherence rates often change over time. This study asked if distinct classes of adherence trajectories with mood stabilizers over time could be found, and if so, which patient characteristics were associated with the classes. METHODS: This analysis was based on 12 weeks of daily self-reported data from 273 patients with bipolar 1 or II disorder using ChronoRecord computer software. All patients were taking at least one mood stabilizer. The latent class mixed model was used to detect trajectories of adherence based on 12 weekly calculated adherence datapoints per patient. RESULTS: Two distinct trajectory classes were found: an adherent class (210 patients; 77%) and a less adherent class (63 patients; 23%). The characteristics associated with the less adherent class were: more time not euthymic (p < 0.001) and female gender (p = 0.016). No other demographic associations were found. CONCLUSION: In a sample of motivated patients who complete daily mood charting, about one quarter were in the less adherent class. Even patients who actively participate in their care, such as by daily mood charting, may be nonadherent. Demographic characteristics may not be useful in assessing individual adherence. Future research on longitudinal adherence patterns in bipolar disorder is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6722168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67221682019-09-17 Trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder Bauer, M. Glenn, T. Alda, M. Bauer, R. Grof, P. Marsh, W. Monteith, S. Munoz, R. Rasgon, N. Sagduyu, K. Whybrow, P. C. Int J Bipolar Disord Research BACKGROUND: Nonadherence with mood stabilizers is a major problem that negatively impacts the course of bipolar disorder. Medication adherence is a complex individual behavior, and adherence rates often change over time. This study asked if distinct classes of adherence trajectories with mood stabilizers over time could be found, and if so, which patient characteristics were associated with the classes. METHODS: This analysis was based on 12 weeks of daily self-reported data from 273 patients with bipolar 1 or II disorder using ChronoRecord computer software. All patients were taking at least one mood stabilizer. The latent class mixed model was used to detect trajectories of adherence based on 12 weekly calculated adherence datapoints per patient. RESULTS: Two distinct trajectory classes were found: an adherent class (210 patients; 77%) and a less adherent class (63 patients; 23%). The characteristics associated with the less adherent class were: more time not euthymic (p < 0.001) and female gender (p = 0.016). No other demographic associations were found. CONCLUSION: In a sample of motivated patients who complete daily mood charting, about one quarter were in the less adherent class. Even patients who actively participate in their care, such as by daily mood charting, may be nonadherent. Demographic characteristics may not be useful in assessing individual adherence. Future research on longitudinal adherence patterns in bipolar disorder is needed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6722168/ /pubmed/31482209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0154-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Bauer, M.
Glenn, T.
Alda, M.
Bauer, R.
Grof, P.
Marsh, W.
Monteith, S.
Munoz, R.
Rasgon, N.
Sagduyu, K.
Whybrow, P. C.
Trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder
title Trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder
title_full Trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder
title_fullStr Trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder
title_full_unstemmed Trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder
title_short Trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder
title_sort trajectories of adherence to mood stabilizers in patients with bipolar disorder
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0154-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bauerm trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT glennt trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT aldam trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT bauerr trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT grofp trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT marshw trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT monteiths trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT munozr trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT rasgonn trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT sagduyuk trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder
AT whybrowpc trajectoriesofadherencetomoodstabilizersinpatientswithbipolardisorder