Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of [(18)F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma

Background and Purpose: Glioblastomas are the most aggressive of all gliomas. The prognosis of these gliomas, which are classified as grade IV tumors by the World Health Organization (WHO), is poor. Combination therapy, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy has variable outcomes and is e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baguet, Tristan, Verhoeven, Jeroen, De Vos, Filip, Goethals, Ingeborg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31555584
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00814
_version_ 1783448479642681344
author Baguet, Tristan
Verhoeven, Jeroen
De Vos, Filip
Goethals, Ingeborg
author_facet Baguet, Tristan
Verhoeven, Jeroen
De Vos, Filip
Goethals, Ingeborg
author_sort Baguet, Tristan
collection PubMed
description Background and Purpose: Glioblastomas are the most aggressive of all gliomas. The prognosis of these gliomas, which are classified as grade IV tumors by the World Health Organization (WHO), is poor. Combination therapy, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy has variable outcomes and is expensive. In light of rising healthcare costs, there are societal demands for the justification of medical expenses. Therefore, we calculated the cost-effectiveness of follow-up [(18)F] fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine ([(18)F] FET) positron emission tomography (PET) scans performed on patients with glioblastoma after surgery and before commencing temozolomide maintenance treatment. Materials and Methods: To determine the cost-effectiveness of follow-up [(18)F] FET PET procedures, we examined published clinical data and calculated the associated costs in the context of Belgian healthcare. We subsequently performed one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo analysis on the calculated ratios. Results: The decision tree based on overall survival rates showed that the number of non-responders identified using PET was 57.14% higher than the number of non-responders identified using conventional MRI. Further, the decision tree based on progression-free survival rates revealed a comparable increase of 57.50% non-responders identified. The calculated cost of two required PET scans per patient during the follow-up treatment phase was 780.50 euros. Two cost-effectiveness ratios were determined for overall survival and progression-free survival rates. Both of these calculations yielded very similar results: incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 1,365.86 and 1,357.38 euros, respectively, for each identified non-responder. The findings of the sensitivity analysis supported the calculated results, confirming that the obtained data were robust. Conclusion: Our comparative study of conventional MRI and [(18)F] FET PET revealed that the latter is a valuable tool for predicting the treatment responses of patients with glioblastomas to follow-up temozolomide maintenance treatment while considering its cost-effectiveness. Thus, [(18)F] FET PET scans enable clinical outcomes to be predicted accurately and at a low cost. Moreover, given the robustness of the data in the sensitivity analyses, the level of certainty of this outcome is acceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6722181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67221812019-09-25 Cost-Effectiveness of [(18)F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma Baguet, Tristan Verhoeven, Jeroen De Vos, Filip Goethals, Ingeborg Front Oncol Oncology Background and Purpose: Glioblastomas are the most aggressive of all gliomas. The prognosis of these gliomas, which are classified as grade IV tumors by the World Health Organization (WHO), is poor. Combination therapy, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy has variable outcomes and is expensive. In light of rising healthcare costs, there are societal demands for the justification of medical expenses. Therefore, we calculated the cost-effectiveness of follow-up [(18)F] fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine ([(18)F] FET) positron emission tomography (PET) scans performed on patients with glioblastoma after surgery and before commencing temozolomide maintenance treatment. Materials and Methods: To determine the cost-effectiveness of follow-up [(18)F] FET PET procedures, we examined published clinical data and calculated the associated costs in the context of Belgian healthcare. We subsequently performed one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo analysis on the calculated ratios. Results: The decision tree based on overall survival rates showed that the number of non-responders identified using PET was 57.14% higher than the number of non-responders identified using conventional MRI. Further, the decision tree based on progression-free survival rates revealed a comparable increase of 57.50% non-responders identified. The calculated cost of two required PET scans per patient during the follow-up treatment phase was 780.50 euros. Two cost-effectiveness ratios were determined for overall survival and progression-free survival rates. Both of these calculations yielded very similar results: incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 1,365.86 and 1,357.38 euros, respectively, for each identified non-responder. The findings of the sensitivity analysis supported the calculated results, confirming that the obtained data were robust. Conclusion: Our comparative study of conventional MRI and [(18)F] FET PET revealed that the latter is a valuable tool for predicting the treatment responses of patients with glioblastomas to follow-up temozolomide maintenance treatment while considering its cost-effectiveness. Thus, [(18)F] FET PET scans enable clinical outcomes to be predicted accurately and at a low cost. Moreover, given the robustness of the data in the sensitivity analyses, the level of certainty of this outcome is acceptable. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6722181/ /pubmed/31555584 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00814 Text en Copyright © 2019 Baguet, Verhoeven, De Vos and Goethals. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Baguet, Tristan
Verhoeven, Jeroen
De Vos, Filip
Goethals, Ingeborg
Cost-Effectiveness of [(18)F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma
title Cost-Effectiveness of [(18)F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of [(18)F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of [(18)F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of [(18)F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of [(18)F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma
title_sort cost-effectiveness of [(18)f] fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine for temozolomide therapy assessment in patients with glioblastoma
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31555584
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00814
work_keys_str_mv AT baguettristan costeffectivenessof18ffluoroethylltyrosinefortemozolomidetherapyassessmentinpatientswithglioblastoma
AT verhoevenjeroen costeffectivenessof18ffluoroethylltyrosinefortemozolomidetherapyassessmentinpatientswithglioblastoma
AT devosfilip costeffectivenessof18ffluoroethylltyrosinefortemozolomidetherapyassessmentinpatientswithglioblastoma
AT goethalsingeborg costeffectivenessof18ffluoroethylltyrosinefortemozolomidetherapyassessmentinpatientswithglioblastoma