Cargando…

Different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in Japanese Black heifers

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the best approach for handling missing records of first to successful insemination (FS) in Japanese Black heifers. METHODS: Of a total of 2,367 records of heifers born between 2003 and 2015 used, 206 (8.7%) of open heifers were missing. Four pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setiaji, Asep, Oikawa, Takuro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744344
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0733
_version_ 1783448508647342080
author Setiaji, Asep
Oikawa, Takuro
author_facet Setiaji, Asep
Oikawa, Takuro
author_sort Setiaji, Asep
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the best approach for handling missing records of first to successful insemination (FS) in Japanese Black heifers. METHODS: Of a total of 2,367 records of heifers born between 2003 and 2015 used, 206 (8.7%) of open heifers were missing. Four penalty methods based on the number of inseminations were set as follows: C1, FS average according to the number of inseminations; C2, constant number of days, 359; C3, maximum number of FS days to each insemination; and C4, average of FS at the last insemination and FS of C2. C5 was generated by adding a constant number (21 d) to the highest number of FS days in each contemporary group. The bootstrap method was used to compare among the 5 methods in terms of bias, mean squared error (MSE) and coefficient of correlation between estimated breeding value (EBV) of non-censored data and censored data. Three percentages (5%, 10%, and 15%) were investigated using the random censoring scheme. The univariate animal model was used to conduct genetic analysis. RESULTS: Heritability of FS in non-censored data was 0.012±0.016, slightly lower than the average estimate from the five penalty methods. C1, C2, and C3 showed lower standard errors of estimated heritability but demonstrated inconsistent results for different percentages of missing records. C4 showed moderate standard errors but more stable ones for all percentages of the missing records, whereas C5 showed the highest standard errors compared with non-censored data. The MSE in C4 heritability was 0.633×10(−4), 0.879×10(−4), 0.876×10(−4) and 0.866 ×10(−4) for 5%, 8.7%, 10%, and 15%, respectively, of the missing records. Thus, C4 showed the lowest and the most stable MSE of heritability; the coefficient of correlation for EBV was 0.88; 0.93 and 0.90 for heifer, sire and dam, respectively. CONCLUSION: C4 demonstrated the highest positive correlation with the non-censored data set and was consistent within different percentages of the missing records. We concluded that C4 was the best penalty method for missing records due to the stable value of estimated parameters and the highest coefficient of correlation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6722307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67223072019-09-09 Different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in Japanese Black heifers Setiaji, Asep Oikawa, Takuro Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the best approach for handling missing records of first to successful insemination (FS) in Japanese Black heifers. METHODS: Of a total of 2,367 records of heifers born between 2003 and 2015 used, 206 (8.7%) of open heifers were missing. Four penalty methods based on the number of inseminations were set as follows: C1, FS average according to the number of inseminations; C2, constant number of days, 359; C3, maximum number of FS days to each insemination; and C4, average of FS at the last insemination and FS of C2. C5 was generated by adding a constant number (21 d) to the highest number of FS days in each contemporary group. The bootstrap method was used to compare among the 5 methods in terms of bias, mean squared error (MSE) and coefficient of correlation between estimated breeding value (EBV) of non-censored data and censored data. Three percentages (5%, 10%, and 15%) were investigated using the random censoring scheme. The univariate animal model was used to conduct genetic analysis. RESULTS: Heritability of FS in non-censored data was 0.012±0.016, slightly lower than the average estimate from the five penalty methods. C1, C2, and C3 showed lower standard errors of estimated heritability but demonstrated inconsistent results for different percentages of missing records. C4 showed moderate standard errors but more stable ones for all percentages of the missing records, whereas C5 showed the highest standard errors compared with non-censored data. The MSE in C4 heritability was 0.633×10(−4), 0.879×10(−4), 0.876×10(−4) and 0.866 ×10(−4) for 5%, 8.7%, 10%, and 15%, respectively, of the missing records. Thus, C4 showed the lowest and the most stable MSE of heritability; the coefficient of correlation for EBV was 0.88; 0.93 and 0.90 for heifer, sire and dam, respectively. CONCLUSION: C4 demonstrated the highest positive correlation with the non-censored data set and was consistent within different percentages of the missing records. We concluded that C4 was the best penalty method for missing records due to the stable value of estimated parameters and the highest coefficient of correlation. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2019-09 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6722307/ /pubmed/30744344 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0733 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Setiaji, Asep
Oikawa, Takuro
Different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in Japanese Black heifers
title Different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in Japanese Black heifers
title_full Different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in Japanese Black heifers
title_fullStr Different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in Japanese Black heifers
title_full_unstemmed Different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in Japanese Black heifers
title_short Different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in Japanese Black heifers
title_sort different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in japanese black heifers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744344
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0733
work_keys_str_mv AT setiajiasep differentpenaltymethodsforassessingintervalfromfirsttosuccessfulinseminationinjapaneseblackheifers
AT oikawatakuro differentpenaltymethodsforassessingintervalfromfirsttosuccessfulinseminationinjapaneseblackheifers