Cargando…

Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Three Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of IgG Antibodies to Ebola Virus in Human Sera

Filovirus serological diagnosis and epidemiological investigations are hampered due to the unavailability of validated immunoassays. Diagnostic performance of three indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (I-ELISA) was evaluated for the detection of IgG antibody to Ebola virus (EBOV) in human se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paweska, Janusz T., Moolla, Naazneen, Storm, Nadia, Msimang, Veerle, Conteh, Ousman, Weyer, Jacqueline, van Vuren, Petrus Jansen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v11080678
_version_ 1783448574628986880
author Paweska, Janusz T.
Moolla, Naazneen
Storm, Nadia
Msimang, Veerle
Conteh, Ousman
Weyer, Jacqueline
van Vuren, Petrus Jansen
author_facet Paweska, Janusz T.
Moolla, Naazneen
Storm, Nadia
Msimang, Veerle
Conteh, Ousman
Weyer, Jacqueline
van Vuren, Petrus Jansen
author_sort Paweska, Janusz T.
collection PubMed
description Filovirus serological diagnosis and epidemiological investigations are hampered due to the unavailability of validated immunoassays. Diagnostic performance of three indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (I-ELISA) was evaluated for the detection of IgG antibody to Ebola virus (EBOV) in human sera. One I-ELISA was based on a whole EBOV antigen (WAg) and two utilized recombinant nucleocapsid (NP) and glycoproteins (GP), respectively. Validation data sets derived from individual sera collected in South Africa (SA), representing an EBOV non-endemic country, and from sera collected during an Ebola disease (EBOD) outbreak in Sierra Leone (SL), were categorized according to the compounded results of the three I-ELISAs and real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). At the cut-off values selected at 95% accuracy level by the two-graph receiver operating characteristic analysis, specificity in the SA EBOV negative serum panel (n = 273) ranged from 98.17% (GP ELISA) to 99.27% (WAg ELISA). Diagnostic specificity in the SL EBOV negative panel (n = 676) was 100% by the three ELISAs. The diagnostic sensitivity in 423 RT-PCR confirmed EBOD patients was dependent on the time when the serum was collected after onset of disease. It significantly increased 2 weeks post-onset, reaching 100% sensitivity by WAg and NP and 98.1% by GP I-ELISA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6722596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67225962019-09-10 Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Three Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of IgG Antibodies to Ebola Virus in Human Sera Paweska, Janusz T. Moolla, Naazneen Storm, Nadia Msimang, Veerle Conteh, Ousman Weyer, Jacqueline van Vuren, Petrus Jansen Viruses Article Filovirus serological diagnosis and epidemiological investigations are hampered due to the unavailability of validated immunoassays. Diagnostic performance of three indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (I-ELISA) was evaluated for the detection of IgG antibody to Ebola virus (EBOV) in human sera. One I-ELISA was based on a whole EBOV antigen (WAg) and two utilized recombinant nucleocapsid (NP) and glycoproteins (GP), respectively. Validation data sets derived from individual sera collected in South Africa (SA), representing an EBOV non-endemic country, and from sera collected during an Ebola disease (EBOD) outbreak in Sierra Leone (SL), were categorized according to the compounded results of the three I-ELISAs and real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). At the cut-off values selected at 95% accuracy level by the two-graph receiver operating characteristic analysis, specificity in the SA EBOV negative serum panel (n = 273) ranged from 98.17% (GP ELISA) to 99.27% (WAg ELISA). Diagnostic specificity in the SL EBOV negative panel (n = 676) was 100% by the three ELISAs. The diagnostic sensitivity in 423 RT-PCR confirmed EBOD patients was dependent on the time when the serum was collected after onset of disease. It significantly increased 2 weeks post-onset, reaching 100% sensitivity by WAg and NP and 98.1% by GP I-ELISA. MDPI 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6722596/ /pubmed/31344850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v11080678 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paweska, Janusz T.
Moolla, Naazneen
Storm, Nadia
Msimang, Veerle
Conteh, Ousman
Weyer, Jacqueline
van Vuren, Petrus Jansen
Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Three Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of IgG Antibodies to Ebola Virus in Human Sera
title Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Three Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of IgG Antibodies to Ebola Virus in Human Sera
title_full Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Three Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of IgG Antibodies to Ebola Virus in Human Sera
title_fullStr Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Three Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of IgG Antibodies to Ebola Virus in Human Sera
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Three Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of IgG Antibodies to Ebola Virus in Human Sera
title_short Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Three Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of IgG Antibodies to Ebola Virus in Human Sera
title_sort evaluation of diagnostic performance of three indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of igg antibodies to ebola virus in human sera
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6722596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v11080678
work_keys_str_mv AT paweskajanuszt evaluationofdiagnosticperformanceofthreeindirectenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaysforthedetectionofiggantibodiestoebolavirusinhumansera
AT moollanaazneen evaluationofdiagnosticperformanceofthreeindirectenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaysforthedetectionofiggantibodiestoebolavirusinhumansera
AT stormnadia evaluationofdiagnosticperformanceofthreeindirectenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaysforthedetectionofiggantibodiestoebolavirusinhumansera
AT msimangveerle evaluationofdiagnosticperformanceofthreeindirectenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaysforthedetectionofiggantibodiestoebolavirusinhumansera
AT contehousman evaluationofdiagnosticperformanceofthreeindirectenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaysforthedetectionofiggantibodiestoebolavirusinhumansera
AT weyerjacqueline evaluationofdiagnosticperformanceofthreeindirectenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaysforthedetectionofiggantibodiestoebolavirusinhumansera
AT vanvurenpetrusjansen evaluationofdiagnosticperformanceofthreeindirectenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaysforthedetectionofiggantibodiestoebolavirusinhumansera