Cargando…

Effects of Listening to Preferred versus Non-Preferred Music on Repeated Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of listening to preferred or non-preferred music on repeated sprint performance. Fourteen physically active males (ages 18–25 years) were recruited for this study. In a counterbalanced crossover study design, participants completed two separate vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballmann, Christopher G., Maynard, Daniel J., Lafoon, Zachary N., Marshall, Mallory R., Williams, Tyler D., Rogers, Rebecca R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7080185
_version_ 1783448676055646208
author Ballmann, Christopher G.
Maynard, Daniel J.
Lafoon, Zachary N.
Marshall, Mallory R.
Williams, Tyler D.
Rogers, Rebecca R.
author_facet Ballmann, Christopher G.
Maynard, Daniel J.
Lafoon, Zachary N.
Marshall, Mallory R.
Williams, Tyler D.
Rogers, Rebecca R.
author_sort Ballmann, Christopher G.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of listening to preferred or non-preferred music on repeated sprint performance. Fourteen physically active males (ages 18–25 years) were recruited for this study. In a counterbalanced crossover study design, participants completed two separate visits. During each visit, participants listened to either preferred or non-preferred music and completed 3 × 15 s Wingate Anaerobic Tests (WAnTs) separated by 2 min active recovery periods. Each visit was separated by a minimal recovery period of 48 h. Anaerobic performance measures, heart rate, rate of perceived exertion (RPE), and motivation were analyzed. Mean power (p = 0.846, effect size (ES) = 0.019), anaerobic capacity (p = 0.686, ES = 0.058), and total work (p = 0.677, ES = 0.039) were not significantly different between preferred and non-preferred music conditions. Mean heart rate (p = 0.608; ES = 0.125) was also unchanged. Motivation to exercise (p < 0.001; ES = 1.520) was significantly higher in the preferred music condition. Additionally, the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) (p = 0.028; ES = 0.540) was significantly lower during the preferred music condition. Our results show that listening to preferred music showed no ergogenic benefit during repeated anaerobic cycling sprints when compared to non-preferred music. However, preferred music increased motivation to exercise and decreased perceived exertion. The results from this study could hold important implications for the application of music and enduring repeated high-intensity sprint exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6723041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67230412019-09-10 Effects of Listening to Preferred versus Non-Preferred Music on Repeated Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance Ballmann, Christopher G. Maynard, Daniel J. Lafoon, Zachary N. Marshall, Mallory R. Williams, Tyler D. Rogers, Rebecca R. Sports (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of listening to preferred or non-preferred music on repeated sprint performance. Fourteen physically active males (ages 18–25 years) were recruited for this study. In a counterbalanced crossover study design, participants completed two separate visits. During each visit, participants listened to either preferred or non-preferred music and completed 3 × 15 s Wingate Anaerobic Tests (WAnTs) separated by 2 min active recovery periods. Each visit was separated by a minimal recovery period of 48 h. Anaerobic performance measures, heart rate, rate of perceived exertion (RPE), and motivation were analyzed. Mean power (p = 0.846, effect size (ES) = 0.019), anaerobic capacity (p = 0.686, ES = 0.058), and total work (p = 0.677, ES = 0.039) were not significantly different between preferred and non-preferred music conditions. Mean heart rate (p = 0.608; ES = 0.125) was also unchanged. Motivation to exercise (p < 0.001; ES = 1.520) was significantly higher in the preferred music condition. Additionally, the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) (p = 0.028; ES = 0.540) was significantly lower during the preferred music condition. Our results show that listening to preferred music showed no ergogenic benefit during repeated anaerobic cycling sprints when compared to non-preferred music. However, preferred music increased motivation to exercise and decreased perceived exertion. The results from this study could hold important implications for the application of music and enduring repeated high-intensity sprint exercise. MDPI 2019-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6723041/ /pubmed/31362419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7080185 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ballmann, Christopher G.
Maynard, Daniel J.
Lafoon, Zachary N.
Marshall, Mallory R.
Williams, Tyler D.
Rogers, Rebecca R.
Effects of Listening to Preferred versus Non-Preferred Music on Repeated Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance
title Effects of Listening to Preferred versus Non-Preferred Music on Repeated Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance
title_full Effects of Listening to Preferred versus Non-Preferred Music on Repeated Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance
title_fullStr Effects of Listening to Preferred versus Non-Preferred Music on Repeated Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Listening to Preferred versus Non-Preferred Music on Repeated Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance
title_short Effects of Listening to Preferred versus Non-Preferred Music on Repeated Wingate Anaerobic Test Performance
title_sort effects of listening to preferred versus non-preferred music on repeated wingate anaerobic test performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31362419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports7080185
work_keys_str_mv AT ballmannchristopherg effectsoflisteningtopreferredversusnonpreferredmusiconrepeatedwingateanaerobictestperformance
AT maynarddanielj effectsoflisteningtopreferredversusnonpreferredmusiconrepeatedwingateanaerobictestperformance
AT lafoonzacharyn effectsoflisteningtopreferredversusnonpreferredmusiconrepeatedwingateanaerobictestperformance
AT marshallmalloryr effectsoflisteningtopreferredversusnonpreferredmusiconrepeatedwingateanaerobictestperformance
AT williamstylerd effectsoflisteningtopreferredversusnonpreferredmusiconrepeatedwingateanaerobictestperformance
AT rogersrebeccar effectsoflisteningtopreferredversusnonpreferredmusiconrepeatedwingateanaerobictestperformance