Cargando…
Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study
Background and Objective: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and umbilical venous catheters (UVC) are frequently used for vascular access in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). While there is a significant need for these devices for critically ill neonates, there are many complication...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080442 |
_version_ | 1783448679007387648 |
---|---|
author | Konstantinidi, Aikaterini Sokou, Rozeta Panagiotounakou, Polytimi Lampridou, Maria Parastatidou, Stavroula Tsantila, Katerina Gounari, Eleni Gounaris, Antonios K. |
author_facet | Konstantinidi, Aikaterini Sokou, Rozeta Panagiotounakou, Polytimi Lampridou, Maria Parastatidou, Stavroula Tsantila, Katerina Gounari, Eleni Gounaris, Antonios K. |
author_sort | Konstantinidi, Aikaterini |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objective: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and umbilical venous catheters (UVC) are frequently used for vascular access in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). While there is a significant need for these devices for critically ill neonates, there are many complications associated with their use. We aimed at investigating the incidence of UVC and PICC complications in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Materials and Methods: This is an observational study performed with neonates of the tertiary General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece, during an 18 month-period. Seventy-one neonates were recruited and divided into two groups: 34 neonates with PICC and 37 neonates with UVC. We recorded: Catheter dwell time, the causes of catheter removal, other complications, infections, and catheter tip colonization rates. Results: No significant statistical differences were noticed between the 2 study groups with regards to demographic characteristics, causes for catheter removal, catheter indwelling time or the incidence of nosocomial infection. Eleven UVC tips and no PICC tips were proved colonized (p = 0.001) following catheter removal. Conclusions: The incidence of complications associated with the use of UVCs and PICCs in VLBW infants did not significantly differ in our study. Their use seems to be equally safe. Further studies, with larger samples, are necessary to confirm our results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6723053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67230532019-09-10 Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study Konstantinidi, Aikaterini Sokou, Rozeta Panagiotounakou, Polytimi Lampridou, Maria Parastatidou, Stavroula Tsantila, Katerina Gounari, Eleni Gounaris, Antonios K. Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objective: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and umbilical venous catheters (UVC) are frequently used for vascular access in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). While there is a significant need for these devices for critically ill neonates, there are many complications associated with their use. We aimed at investigating the incidence of UVC and PICC complications in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Materials and Methods: This is an observational study performed with neonates of the tertiary General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece, during an 18 month-period. Seventy-one neonates were recruited and divided into two groups: 34 neonates with PICC and 37 neonates with UVC. We recorded: Catheter dwell time, the causes of catheter removal, other complications, infections, and catheter tip colonization rates. Results: No significant statistical differences were noticed between the 2 study groups with regards to demographic characteristics, causes for catheter removal, catheter indwelling time or the incidence of nosocomial infection. Eleven UVC tips and no PICC tips were proved colonized (p = 0.001) following catheter removal. Conclusions: The incidence of complications associated with the use of UVCs and PICCs in VLBW infants did not significantly differ in our study. Their use seems to be equally safe. Further studies, with larger samples, are necessary to confirm our results. MDPI 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6723053/ /pubmed/31390790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080442 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Konstantinidi, Aikaterini Sokou, Rozeta Panagiotounakou, Polytimi Lampridou, Maria Parastatidou, Stavroula Tsantila, Katerina Gounari, Eleni Gounaris, Antonios K. Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study |
title | Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study |
title_full | Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study |
title_fullStr | Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study |
title_short | Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study |
title_sort | umbilical venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters: are they equally safe in vlbw infants? a non-randomized single center study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080442 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT konstantinidiaikaterini umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy AT sokourozeta umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy AT panagiotounakoupolytimi umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy AT lampridoumaria umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy AT parastatidoustavroula umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy AT tsantilakaterina umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy AT gounarieleni umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy AT gounarisantoniosk umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy |