Cargando…

Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study

Background and Objective: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and umbilical venous catheters (UVC) are frequently used for vascular access in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). While there is a significant need for these devices for critically ill neonates, there are many complication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konstantinidi, Aikaterini, Sokou, Rozeta, Panagiotounakou, Polytimi, Lampridou, Maria, Parastatidou, Stavroula, Tsantila, Katerina, Gounari, Eleni, Gounaris, Antonios K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080442
_version_ 1783448679007387648
author Konstantinidi, Aikaterini
Sokou, Rozeta
Panagiotounakou, Polytimi
Lampridou, Maria
Parastatidou, Stavroula
Tsantila, Katerina
Gounari, Eleni
Gounaris, Antonios K.
author_facet Konstantinidi, Aikaterini
Sokou, Rozeta
Panagiotounakou, Polytimi
Lampridou, Maria
Parastatidou, Stavroula
Tsantila, Katerina
Gounari, Eleni
Gounaris, Antonios K.
author_sort Konstantinidi, Aikaterini
collection PubMed
description Background and Objective: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and umbilical venous catheters (UVC) are frequently used for vascular access in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). While there is a significant need for these devices for critically ill neonates, there are many complications associated with their use. We aimed at investigating the incidence of UVC and PICC complications in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Materials and Methods: This is an observational study performed with neonates of the tertiary General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece, during an 18 month-period. Seventy-one neonates were recruited and divided into two groups: 34 neonates with PICC and 37 neonates with UVC. We recorded: Catheter dwell time, the causes of catheter removal, other complications, infections, and catheter tip colonization rates. Results: No significant statistical differences were noticed between the 2 study groups with regards to demographic characteristics, causes for catheter removal, catheter indwelling time or the incidence of nosocomial infection. Eleven UVC tips and no PICC tips were proved colonized (p = 0.001) following catheter removal. Conclusions: The incidence of complications associated with the use of UVCs and PICCs in VLBW infants did not significantly differ in our study. Their use seems to be equally safe. Further studies, with larger samples, are necessary to confirm our results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6723053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67230532019-09-10 Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study Konstantinidi, Aikaterini Sokou, Rozeta Panagiotounakou, Polytimi Lampridou, Maria Parastatidou, Stavroula Tsantila, Katerina Gounari, Eleni Gounaris, Antonios K. Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objective: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and umbilical venous catheters (UVC) are frequently used for vascular access in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). While there is a significant need for these devices for critically ill neonates, there are many complications associated with their use. We aimed at investigating the incidence of UVC and PICC complications in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Materials and Methods: This is an observational study performed with neonates of the tertiary General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece, during an 18 month-period. Seventy-one neonates were recruited and divided into two groups: 34 neonates with PICC and 37 neonates with UVC. We recorded: Catheter dwell time, the causes of catheter removal, other complications, infections, and catheter tip colonization rates. Results: No significant statistical differences were noticed between the 2 study groups with regards to demographic characteristics, causes for catheter removal, catheter indwelling time or the incidence of nosocomial infection. Eleven UVC tips and no PICC tips were proved colonized (p = 0.001) following catheter removal. Conclusions: The incidence of complications associated with the use of UVCs and PICCs in VLBW infants did not significantly differ in our study. Their use seems to be equally safe. Further studies, with larger samples, are necessary to confirm our results. MDPI 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6723053/ /pubmed/31390790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080442 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Konstantinidi, Aikaterini
Sokou, Rozeta
Panagiotounakou, Polytimi
Lampridou, Maria
Parastatidou, Stavroula
Tsantila, Katerina
Gounari, Eleni
Gounaris, Antonios K.
Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study
title Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study
title_full Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study
title_fullStr Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study
title_short Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study
title_sort umbilical venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters: are they equally safe in vlbw infants? a non-randomized single center study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080442
work_keys_str_mv AT konstantinidiaikaterini umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy
AT sokourozeta umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy
AT panagiotounakoupolytimi umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy
AT lampridoumaria umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy
AT parastatidoustavroula umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy
AT tsantilakaterina umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy
AT gounarieleni umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy
AT gounarisantoniosk umbilicalvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcathetersaretheyequallysafeinvlbwinfantsanonrandomizedsinglecenterstudy