Cargando…

Modelling of Molasses Fermentation for Bioethanol Production: A Comparative Investigation of Monod and Andrews Models Accuracy Assessment

Modelling has recently become a key tool to promote the bioethanol industry and to optimise the fermentation process to be easily integrated into the industrial sector. In this context, this study aims at investigating the applicability of two mathematical models (Andrews and Monod) for molasses fer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zentou, Hamid, Zainal Abidin, Zurina, Yunus, Robiah, Awang Biak, Dayang Radiah, Zouanti, Mustapha, Hassani, Abdelkader
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357463
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom9080308
_version_ 1783448778462724096
author Zentou, Hamid
Zainal Abidin, Zurina
Yunus, Robiah
Awang Biak, Dayang Radiah
Zouanti, Mustapha
Hassani, Abdelkader
author_facet Zentou, Hamid
Zainal Abidin, Zurina
Yunus, Robiah
Awang Biak, Dayang Radiah
Zouanti, Mustapha
Hassani, Abdelkader
author_sort Zentou, Hamid
collection PubMed
description Modelling has recently become a key tool to promote the bioethanol industry and to optimise the fermentation process to be easily integrated into the industrial sector. In this context, this study aims at investigating the applicability of two mathematical models (Andrews and Monod) for molasses fermentation. The kinetics parameters for Monod and Andrews were estimated from experimental data using Matlab and OriginLab software. The models were simulated and compared with another set of experimental data that was not used for parameters’ estimation. The results of modelling showed that μ(max) = 0.179 1/h and K(s) = 11.37 g.L(−1) for the Monod model, whereas μ(max) = 0.508 1/h, K(s) = 47.53 g.L(−1) and K(i) = 181.01 g.L(−1) for the Andrews model, which are too close to the values reported in previous studies. The validation of both models showed that the Monod model is more suitable for batch fermentation modelling at a low concentration, where the highest R squared was observed at S(0) = 75 g.L(−1) with an R squared equal to 0.99956, 0.99954, and 0.99859 for the biomass, substrate, and product concentrations, respectively. In contrast, the Andrews model was more accurate at a high initial substrate concentration and the model data showed a good agreement compared to the experimental data of batch fermentation at S(0) = 225 g.L(−1), which was reflected in a high R squared with values 0.99795, 0.99903, and 0.99962 for the biomass, substrate, and product concentrations respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6723480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67234802019-09-10 Modelling of Molasses Fermentation for Bioethanol Production: A Comparative Investigation of Monod and Andrews Models Accuracy Assessment Zentou, Hamid Zainal Abidin, Zurina Yunus, Robiah Awang Biak, Dayang Radiah Zouanti, Mustapha Hassani, Abdelkader Biomolecules Article Modelling has recently become a key tool to promote the bioethanol industry and to optimise the fermentation process to be easily integrated into the industrial sector. In this context, this study aims at investigating the applicability of two mathematical models (Andrews and Monod) for molasses fermentation. The kinetics parameters for Monod and Andrews were estimated from experimental data using Matlab and OriginLab software. The models were simulated and compared with another set of experimental data that was not used for parameters’ estimation. The results of modelling showed that μ(max) = 0.179 1/h and K(s) = 11.37 g.L(−1) for the Monod model, whereas μ(max) = 0.508 1/h, K(s) = 47.53 g.L(−1) and K(i) = 181.01 g.L(−1) for the Andrews model, which are too close to the values reported in previous studies. The validation of both models showed that the Monod model is more suitable for batch fermentation modelling at a low concentration, where the highest R squared was observed at S(0) = 75 g.L(−1) with an R squared equal to 0.99956, 0.99954, and 0.99859 for the biomass, substrate, and product concentrations, respectively. In contrast, the Andrews model was more accurate at a high initial substrate concentration and the model data showed a good agreement compared to the experimental data of batch fermentation at S(0) = 225 g.L(−1), which was reflected in a high R squared with values 0.99795, 0.99903, and 0.99962 for the biomass, substrate, and product concentrations respectively. MDPI 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6723480/ /pubmed/31357463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom9080308 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zentou, Hamid
Zainal Abidin, Zurina
Yunus, Robiah
Awang Biak, Dayang Radiah
Zouanti, Mustapha
Hassani, Abdelkader
Modelling of Molasses Fermentation for Bioethanol Production: A Comparative Investigation of Monod and Andrews Models Accuracy Assessment
title Modelling of Molasses Fermentation for Bioethanol Production: A Comparative Investigation of Monod and Andrews Models Accuracy Assessment
title_full Modelling of Molasses Fermentation for Bioethanol Production: A Comparative Investigation of Monod and Andrews Models Accuracy Assessment
title_fullStr Modelling of Molasses Fermentation for Bioethanol Production: A Comparative Investigation of Monod and Andrews Models Accuracy Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Modelling of Molasses Fermentation for Bioethanol Production: A Comparative Investigation of Monod and Andrews Models Accuracy Assessment
title_short Modelling of Molasses Fermentation for Bioethanol Production: A Comparative Investigation of Monod and Andrews Models Accuracy Assessment
title_sort modelling of molasses fermentation for bioethanol production: a comparative investigation of monod and andrews models accuracy assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357463
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom9080308
work_keys_str_mv AT zentouhamid modellingofmolassesfermentationforbioethanolproductionacomparativeinvestigationofmonodandandrewsmodelsaccuracyassessment
AT zainalabidinzurina modellingofmolassesfermentationforbioethanolproductionacomparativeinvestigationofmonodandandrewsmodelsaccuracyassessment
AT yunusrobiah modellingofmolassesfermentationforbioethanolproductionacomparativeinvestigationofmonodandandrewsmodelsaccuracyassessment
AT awangbiakdayangradiah modellingofmolassesfermentationforbioethanolproductionacomparativeinvestigationofmonodandandrewsmodelsaccuracyassessment
AT zouantimustapha modellingofmolassesfermentationforbioethanolproductionacomparativeinvestigationofmonodandandrewsmodelsaccuracyassessment
AT hassaniabdelkader modellingofmolassesfermentationforbioethanolproductionacomparativeinvestigationofmonodandandrewsmodelsaccuracyassessment