Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Coeliac Disease in Women with Infertility

We aimed to estimate the seroprevalence and the prevalence of coeliac disease (CD) in women with reproductive problems. A systematic review of English published articles until June 2019 was performed in PubMed and Scopus using the terms: (infertility and (coeliac disease OR gluten) OR (miscarriage a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castaño, Mercedes, Gómez-Gordo, Rubén, Cuevas, David, Núñez, Concepción
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31434238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11081950
_version_ 1783448816641376256
author Castaño, Mercedes
Gómez-Gordo, Rubén
Cuevas, David
Núñez, Concepción
author_facet Castaño, Mercedes
Gómez-Gordo, Rubén
Cuevas, David
Núñez, Concepción
author_sort Castaño, Mercedes
collection PubMed
description We aimed to estimate the seroprevalence and the prevalence of coeliac disease (CD) in women with reproductive problems. A systematic review of English published articles until June 2019 was performed in PubMed and Scopus using the terms: (infertility and (coeliac disease OR gluten) OR (miscarriage and (coeliac disease OR gluten) OR (abortion and (coeliac disease OR gluten). All articles showing numerical data of anti-transglutaminase type 2 or anti-endomisium antibodies, or intestinal biopsy information were included. The study group comprised women with overall infertility, unexplained infertility, or recurrent spontaneous abortions. Two authors independently performed data extraction using a predefined data sheet. The initial search yielded 310 articles, and 23 were selected for data extraction. After meta-analysis, the pooled seroprevalence was very similar for overall and unexplained infertility, with a pooled proportion of around 1.3%–1.6%. This implies three times higher odds of having CD in infertility when compared to controls. The pooled prevalence could not be accurately calculated due to the small sample sizes. Further studies with increased sample sizes are necessary before giving specific recommendations for CD screening in women with reproductive problems, but current data seem to support a higher risk of CD in these women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6723639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67236392019-09-10 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Coeliac Disease in Women with Infertility Castaño, Mercedes Gómez-Gordo, Rubén Cuevas, David Núñez, Concepción Nutrients Review We aimed to estimate the seroprevalence and the prevalence of coeliac disease (CD) in women with reproductive problems. A systematic review of English published articles until June 2019 was performed in PubMed and Scopus using the terms: (infertility and (coeliac disease OR gluten) OR (miscarriage and (coeliac disease OR gluten) OR (abortion and (coeliac disease OR gluten). All articles showing numerical data of anti-transglutaminase type 2 or anti-endomisium antibodies, or intestinal biopsy information were included. The study group comprised women with overall infertility, unexplained infertility, or recurrent spontaneous abortions. Two authors independently performed data extraction using a predefined data sheet. The initial search yielded 310 articles, and 23 were selected for data extraction. After meta-analysis, the pooled seroprevalence was very similar for overall and unexplained infertility, with a pooled proportion of around 1.3%–1.6%. This implies three times higher odds of having CD in infertility when compared to controls. The pooled prevalence could not be accurately calculated due to the small sample sizes. Further studies with increased sample sizes are necessary before giving specific recommendations for CD screening in women with reproductive problems, but current data seem to support a higher risk of CD in these women. MDPI 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6723639/ /pubmed/31434238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11081950 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Castaño, Mercedes
Gómez-Gordo, Rubén
Cuevas, David
Núñez, Concepción
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Coeliac Disease in Women with Infertility
title Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Coeliac Disease in Women with Infertility
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Coeliac Disease in Women with Infertility
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Coeliac Disease in Women with Infertility
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Coeliac Disease in Women with Infertility
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Coeliac Disease in Women with Infertility
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of coeliac disease in women with infertility
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31434238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11081950
work_keys_str_mv AT castanomercedes systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprevalenceofcoeliacdiseaseinwomenwithinfertility
AT gomezgordoruben systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprevalenceofcoeliacdiseaseinwomenwithinfertility
AT cuevasdavid systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprevalenceofcoeliacdiseaseinwomenwithinfertility
AT nunezconcepcion systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprevalenceofcoeliacdiseaseinwomenwithinfertility