Cargando…

Gluten and FODMAPS—Sense of a Restriction/When Is Restriction Necessary?

Gluten-free diet (GFD) is enjoying increasingly popularity, although gluten-free products are considerably more expensive. GFD is absolutely necessary for patients with celiac disease, as in this case even minor amounts of gluten can lead to the destruction of the intestinal mucosa. In addition, GFD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dieterich, Walburga, Zopf, Yurdagül
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31434299
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11081957
_version_ 1783448819244990464
author Dieterich, Walburga
Zopf, Yurdagül
author_facet Dieterich, Walburga
Zopf, Yurdagül
author_sort Dieterich, Walburga
collection PubMed
description Gluten-free diet (GFD) is enjoying increasingly popularity, although gluten-free products are considerably more expensive. GFD is absolutely necessary for patients with celiac disease, as in this case even minor amounts of gluten can lead to the destruction of the intestinal mucosa. In addition, GFD is currently the best therapy to improve clinical symptoms of patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), although the diet may not be as strict as that for patients with celiac disease. Beside gluten, other wheat components such as oligosaccharides and amylase trypsin inhibitors are discussed as triggers of NCGS in this review. An overlap between gastrointestinal symptoms in NCGS and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is described. Patients with NCGS attribute their symptoms to the consumption of gluten, while patients with IBS rarely describe gluten as a trigger. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that the introduction of a low FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols) diet reduced gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBS and this diet is suggested as the first choice of therapy in IBS. However, a low FODMAP diet also eliminates prebiotica and may negatively influence the gut microbiota. For this reason, the diet should be liberalized after symptom improvement. There is no evidence that a GFD is healthier than the standard diet. In contrast, GFD often is accompanied by nutritional deficiencies, mainly minerals and vitamins. Therefore, GFD and low FODMAP diets are not recommended for healthy subjects. Since wheat contains fructans belonging to FODMAPs), a GFD is not only gluten-free but also has less FODMAPs. Thus, symptom improvement cannot be correctly correlated with the reduction of either one or the other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6723650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67236502019-09-10 Gluten and FODMAPS—Sense of a Restriction/When Is Restriction Necessary? Dieterich, Walburga Zopf, Yurdagül Nutrients Communication Gluten-free diet (GFD) is enjoying increasingly popularity, although gluten-free products are considerably more expensive. GFD is absolutely necessary for patients with celiac disease, as in this case even minor amounts of gluten can lead to the destruction of the intestinal mucosa. In addition, GFD is currently the best therapy to improve clinical symptoms of patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), although the diet may not be as strict as that for patients with celiac disease. Beside gluten, other wheat components such as oligosaccharides and amylase trypsin inhibitors are discussed as triggers of NCGS in this review. An overlap between gastrointestinal symptoms in NCGS and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is described. Patients with NCGS attribute their symptoms to the consumption of gluten, while patients with IBS rarely describe gluten as a trigger. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that the introduction of a low FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols) diet reduced gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBS and this diet is suggested as the first choice of therapy in IBS. However, a low FODMAP diet also eliminates prebiotica and may negatively influence the gut microbiota. For this reason, the diet should be liberalized after symptom improvement. There is no evidence that a GFD is healthier than the standard diet. In contrast, GFD often is accompanied by nutritional deficiencies, mainly minerals and vitamins. Therefore, GFD and low FODMAP diets are not recommended for healthy subjects. Since wheat contains fructans belonging to FODMAPs), a GFD is not only gluten-free but also has less FODMAPs. Thus, symptom improvement cannot be correctly correlated with the reduction of either one or the other. MDPI 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6723650/ /pubmed/31434299 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11081957 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Dieterich, Walburga
Zopf, Yurdagül
Gluten and FODMAPS—Sense of a Restriction/When Is Restriction Necessary?
title Gluten and FODMAPS—Sense of a Restriction/When Is Restriction Necessary?
title_full Gluten and FODMAPS—Sense of a Restriction/When Is Restriction Necessary?
title_fullStr Gluten and FODMAPS—Sense of a Restriction/When Is Restriction Necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Gluten and FODMAPS—Sense of a Restriction/When Is Restriction Necessary?
title_short Gluten and FODMAPS—Sense of a Restriction/When Is Restriction Necessary?
title_sort gluten and fodmaps—sense of a restriction/when is restriction necessary?
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31434299
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11081957
work_keys_str_mv AT dieterichwalburga glutenandfodmapssenseofarestrictionwhenisrestrictionnecessary
AT zopfyurdagul glutenandfodmapssenseofarestrictionwhenisrestrictionnecessary