Cargando…
Use and abuse of fecal occult blood tests: a community hospital experience
BACKGROUND: The Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) is one of the diagnostic modalities indicated for screening patients for Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Despite being approved only for screening for CRC, numerous studies in the past have illustrated misuse of the FOBT. We examined utilization of the FOBT fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1079-9 |
_version_ | 1783448946230689792 |
---|---|
author | Soin, Sarthak Akanbi, Olalekan Ahmed, Abdullah Kim, Yunha Pandit, Sarbagya Wroblewski, Igor Saleem, Nasir |
author_facet | Soin, Sarthak Akanbi, Olalekan Ahmed, Abdullah Kim, Yunha Pandit, Sarbagya Wroblewski, Igor Saleem, Nasir |
author_sort | Soin, Sarthak |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) is one of the diagnostic modalities indicated for screening patients for Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Despite being approved only for screening for CRC, numerous studies in the past have illustrated misuse of the FOBT. We examined utilization of the FOBT for patients admitted to a community teaching hospital. METHODS: The study was conducted at Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago USA. A retrospective review of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) of patients admitted from January 2016 to December 2017 was performed. RESULTS: We reviewed the EMRs of 729 patients who received the stool testing for occult blood (FOBT). All tests (100%) were carried out for purposes other than CRC screening. Anemia (38%) was the most common reason documented for carrying out the FOBT. Further, 88% of the tests were ordered on patients who either did not fulfill CRC screening criteria or had other contraindications for testing. Usage of contraindicated medication was the most important factor (58% of patients) that made the candidates ineligible for testing. A total 73 Colonoscopies were ordered for patients who received the test inappropriately with a resulting low yield (0.47%) of CRC diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The stool occult blood test continues to be utilized for reasons other than CRC screening. Majority of patients who underwent the test were not suitable candidates due to the presence of contraindications for testing. Unsuitable FOBT testing led to further unnecessary investigations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6724234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67242342019-09-10 Use and abuse of fecal occult blood tests: a community hospital experience Soin, Sarthak Akanbi, Olalekan Ahmed, Abdullah Kim, Yunha Pandit, Sarbagya Wroblewski, Igor Saleem, Nasir BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) is one of the diagnostic modalities indicated for screening patients for Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Despite being approved only for screening for CRC, numerous studies in the past have illustrated misuse of the FOBT. We examined utilization of the FOBT for patients admitted to a community teaching hospital. METHODS: The study was conducted at Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago USA. A retrospective review of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) of patients admitted from January 2016 to December 2017 was performed. RESULTS: We reviewed the EMRs of 729 patients who received the stool testing for occult blood (FOBT). All tests (100%) were carried out for purposes other than CRC screening. Anemia (38%) was the most common reason documented for carrying out the FOBT. Further, 88% of the tests were ordered on patients who either did not fulfill CRC screening criteria or had other contraindications for testing. Usage of contraindicated medication was the most important factor (58% of patients) that made the candidates ineligible for testing. A total 73 Colonoscopies were ordered for patients who received the test inappropriately with a resulting low yield (0.47%) of CRC diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The stool occult blood test continues to be utilized for reasons other than CRC screening. Majority of patients who underwent the test were not suitable candidates due to the presence of contraindications for testing. Unsuitable FOBT testing led to further unnecessary investigations. BioMed Central 2019-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6724234/ /pubmed/31481027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1079-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Soin, Sarthak Akanbi, Olalekan Ahmed, Abdullah Kim, Yunha Pandit, Sarbagya Wroblewski, Igor Saleem, Nasir Use and abuse of fecal occult blood tests: a community hospital experience |
title | Use and abuse of fecal occult blood tests: a community hospital experience |
title_full | Use and abuse of fecal occult blood tests: a community hospital experience |
title_fullStr | Use and abuse of fecal occult blood tests: a community hospital experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Use and abuse of fecal occult blood tests: a community hospital experience |
title_short | Use and abuse of fecal occult blood tests: a community hospital experience |
title_sort | use and abuse of fecal occult blood tests: a community hospital experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1079-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soinsarthak useandabuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsacommunityhospitalexperience AT akanbiolalekan useandabuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsacommunityhospitalexperience AT ahmedabdullah useandabuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsacommunityhospitalexperience AT kimyunha useandabuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsacommunityhospitalexperience AT panditsarbagya useandabuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsacommunityhospitalexperience AT wroblewskiigor useandabuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsacommunityhospitalexperience AT saleemnasir useandabuseoffecaloccultbloodtestsacommunityhospitalexperience |