Cargando…

Rethinking Strategies for Positive Newborn Screening Result (NBS+) Delivery (ReSPoND): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress

BACKGROUND: Newborn blood spot (NBS) screening seeks to prevent ill health, disability and death through early diagnosis and effective intervention. Each year, around 10,000 parents of babies born in England are given a positive NBS result indicating their child may be affected or carriers of one of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chudleigh, Jane, Bonham, Jim, Bryon, Mandy, Francis, Jill, Moody, Louise, Morris, Steve, Simpson, Alan, Ulph, Fiona, Southern, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31508239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0487-5
_version_ 1783448957551116288
author Chudleigh, Jane
Bonham, Jim
Bryon, Mandy
Francis, Jill
Moody, Louise
Morris, Steve
Simpson, Alan
Ulph, Fiona
Southern, Kevin
author_facet Chudleigh, Jane
Bonham, Jim
Bryon, Mandy
Francis, Jill
Moody, Louise
Morris, Steve
Simpson, Alan
Ulph, Fiona
Southern, Kevin
author_sort Chudleigh, Jane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Newborn blood spot (NBS) screening seeks to prevent ill health, disability and death through early diagnosis and effective intervention. Each year, around 10,000 parents of babies born in England are given a positive NBS result indicating their child may be affected or carriers of one of the nine conditions currently screened for. Despite guidance, these results are inconsistently delivered to parents across geographical regions. There is evidence that many parents are dissatisfied with how NBS results are communicated to them and that poor communication practices can lead to various negative sequelae. The purpose of this study is to co-design, implement and undertake a process evaluation of new, co-designed interventions to improve delivery of initial positive NBS results to parents. METHODS: This mixed-methods study will use four phases with defined outputs. Family Systems Theory will form the theoretical basis for the study. The principles and methods of experience-based co-design will underpin intervention development. Normalisation Process Theory will underpin the process evaluation of the interventions co-designed to improve the delivery of positive NBS results to parents. An economic analysis will determine resource use and costs of current practice and of implementing the new co-designed interventions. The nominal group technique will be used to inform the selection of suitable outcome measures for a future evaluation study. DISCUSSION: The main output of the proposed study will be co-designed interventions for initial communication of positive NBS results to parents ready to be evaluated in a definitive evaluation study. The interventions, co-designed with parents, will help to minimise potential negative sequelae associated with poor communication practices by considering parental and staff experiences as well as healthcare challenges such as finite resources. In addition, information about indicative costs associated with different communication strategies will be determined. It is anticipated it may also be possible to extrapolate principles of good communication practices from the present study for the delivery of bad news to parents for children newly diagnosed with other conditions including cancer and other chronic conditions such as diabetes or epilepsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 15330120 date of registration 17/01/2018
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6724281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67242812019-09-10 Rethinking Strategies for Positive Newborn Screening Result (NBS+) Delivery (ReSPoND): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress Chudleigh, Jane Bonham, Jim Bryon, Mandy Francis, Jill Moody, Louise Morris, Steve Simpson, Alan Ulph, Fiona Southern, Kevin Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Newborn blood spot (NBS) screening seeks to prevent ill health, disability and death through early diagnosis and effective intervention. Each year, around 10,000 parents of babies born in England are given a positive NBS result indicating their child may be affected or carriers of one of the nine conditions currently screened for. Despite guidance, these results are inconsistently delivered to parents across geographical regions. There is evidence that many parents are dissatisfied with how NBS results are communicated to them and that poor communication practices can lead to various negative sequelae. The purpose of this study is to co-design, implement and undertake a process evaluation of new, co-designed interventions to improve delivery of initial positive NBS results to parents. METHODS: This mixed-methods study will use four phases with defined outputs. Family Systems Theory will form the theoretical basis for the study. The principles and methods of experience-based co-design will underpin intervention development. Normalisation Process Theory will underpin the process evaluation of the interventions co-designed to improve the delivery of positive NBS results to parents. An economic analysis will determine resource use and costs of current practice and of implementing the new co-designed interventions. The nominal group technique will be used to inform the selection of suitable outcome measures for a future evaluation study. DISCUSSION: The main output of the proposed study will be co-designed interventions for initial communication of positive NBS results to parents ready to be evaluated in a definitive evaluation study. The interventions, co-designed with parents, will help to minimise potential negative sequelae associated with poor communication practices by considering parental and staff experiences as well as healthcare challenges such as finite resources. In addition, information about indicative costs associated with different communication strategies will be determined. It is anticipated it may also be possible to extrapolate principles of good communication practices from the present study for the delivery of bad news to parents for children newly diagnosed with other conditions including cancer and other chronic conditions such as diabetes or epilepsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 15330120 date of registration 17/01/2018 BioMed Central 2019-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6724281/ /pubmed/31508239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0487-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Chudleigh, Jane
Bonham, Jim
Bryon, Mandy
Francis, Jill
Moody, Louise
Morris, Steve
Simpson, Alan
Ulph, Fiona
Southern, Kevin
Rethinking Strategies for Positive Newborn Screening Result (NBS+) Delivery (ReSPoND): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress
title Rethinking Strategies for Positive Newborn Screening Result (NBS+) Delivery (ReSPoND): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress
title_full Rethinking Strategies for Positive Newborn Screening Result (NBS+) Delivery (ReSPoND): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress
title_fullStr Rethinking Strategies for Positive Newborn Screening Result (NBS+) Delivery (ReSPoND): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking Strategies for Positive Newborn Screening Result (NBS+) Delivery (ReSPoND): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress
title_short Rethinking Strategies for Positive Newborn Screening Result (NBS+) Delivery (ReSPoND): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress
title_sort rethinking strategies for positive newborn screening result (nbs+) delivery (respond): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31508239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0487-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chudleighjane rethinkingstrategiesforpositivenewbornscreeningresultnbsdeliveryrespondaprocessevaluationofcodesigninginterventionstominimiseimpactonparentalemotionalwellbeingandstress
AT bonhamjim rethinkingstrategiesforpositivenewbornscreeningresultnbsdeliveryrespondaprocessevaluationofcodesigninginterventionstominimiseimpactonparentalemotionalwellbeingandstress
AT bryonmandy rethinkingstrategiesforpositivenewbornscreeningresultnbsdeliveryrespondaprocessevaluationofcodesigninginterventionstominimiseimpactonparentalemotionalwellbeingandstress
AT francisjill rethinkingstrategiesforpositivenewbornscreeningresultnbsdeliveryrespondaprocessevaluationofcodesigninginterventionstominimiseimpactonparentalemotionalwellbeingandstress
AT moodylouise rethinkingstrategiesforpositivenewbornscreeningresultnbsdeliveryrespondaprocessevaluationofcodesigninginterventionstominimiseimpactonparentalemotionalwellbeingandstress
AT morrissteve rethinkingstrategiesforpositivenewbornscreeningresultnbsdeliveryrespondaprocessevaluationofcodesigninginterventionstominimiseimpactonparentalemotionalwellbeingandstress
AT simpsonalan rethinkingstrategiesforpositivenewbornscreeningresultnbsdeliveryrespondaprocessevaluationofcodesigninginterventionstominimiseimpactonparentalemotionalwellbeingandstress
AT ulphfiona rethinkingstrategiesforpositivenewbornscreeningresultnbsdeliveryrespondaprocessevaluationofcodesigninginterventionstominimiseimpactonparentalemotionalwellbeingandstress
AT southernkevin rethinkingstrategiesforpositivenewbornscreeningresultnbsdeliveryrespondaprocessevaluationofcodesigninginterventionstominimiseimpactonparentalemotionalwellbeingandstress