Cargando…
Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology
Machine learning approaches to problem-solving are growing rapidly within healthcare, and radiation oncology is no exception. With the burgeoning interest in machine learning comes the significant risk of misaligned expectations as to what it can and cannot accomplish. This paper evaluates the role...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31112393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190001 |
_version_ | 1783449029136351232 |
---|---|
author | Jarrett, Daniel Stride, Eleanor Vallis, Katherine Gooding, Mark J. |
author_facet | Jarrett, Daniel Stride, Eleanor Vallis, Katherine Gooding, Mark J. |
author_sort | Jarrett, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Machine learning approaches to problem-solving are growing rapidly within healthcare, and radiation oncology is no exception. With the burgeoning interest in machine learning comes the significant risk of misaligned expectations as to what it can and cannot accomplish. This paper evaluates the role of machine learning and the problems it solves within the context of current clinical challenges in radiation oncology. The role of learning algorithms within the workflow for external beam radiation therapy are surveyed, considering simulation imaging, multimodal fusion, image segmentation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery and adaptation. For each aspect, the clinical challenges faced, the learning algorithms proposed, and the successes and limitations of various approaches are analyzed. It is observed that machine learning has largely thrived on reproducibly mimicking conventional human-driven solutions with more efficiency and consistency. On the other hand, since algorithms are generally trained using expert opinion as ground truth, machine learning is of limited utility where problems or ground truths are not well-defined, or if suitable measures of correctness are not available. As a result, machines may excel at replicating, automating and standardizing human behaviour on manual chores, meanwhile the conceptual clinical challenges relating to definition, evaluation, and judgement remain in the realm of human intelligence and insight. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6724618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67246182019-10-23 Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology Jarrett, Daniel Stride, Eleanor Vallis, Katherine Gooding, Mark J. Br J Radiol Review Article Machine learning approaches to problem-solving are growing rapidly within healthcare, and radiation oncology is no exception. With the burgeoning interest in machine learning comes the significant risk of misaligned expectations as to what it can and cannot accomplish. This paper evaluates the role of machine learning and the problems it solves within the context of current clinical challenges in radiation oncology. The role of learning algorithms within the workflow for external beam radiation therapy are surveyed, considering simulation imaging, multimodal fusion, image segmentation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery and adaptation. For each aspect, the clinical challenges faced, the learning algorithms proposed, and the successes and limitations of various approaches are analyzed. It is observed that machine learning has largely thrived on reproducibly mimicking conventional human-driven solutions with more efficiency and consistency. On the other hand, since algorithms are generally trained using expert opinion as ground truth, machine learning is of limited utility where problems or ground truths are not well-defined, or if suitable measures of correctness are not available. As a result, machines may excel at replicating, automating and standardizing human behaviour on manual chores, meanwhile the conceptual clinical challenges relating to definition, evaluation, and judgement remain in the realm of human intelligence and insight. The British Institute of Radiology. 2019-08 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6724618/ /pubmed/31112393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190001 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Jarrett, Daniel Stride, Eleanor Vallis, Katherine Gooding, Mark J. Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology |
title | Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology |
title_full | Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology |
title_fullStr | Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology |
title_full_unstemmed | Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology |
title_short | Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology |
title_sort | applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31112393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jarrettdaniel applicationsandlimitationsofmachinelearninginradiationoncology AT strideeleanor applicationsandlimitationsofmachinelearninginradiationoncology AT valliskatherine applicationsandlimitationsofmachinelearninginradiationoncology AT goodingmarkj applicationsandlimitationsofmachinelearninginradiationoncology |