Cargando…

Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology

Machine learning approaches to problem-solving are growing rapidly within healthcare, and radiation oncology is no exception. With the burgeoning interest in machine learning comes the significant risk of misaligned expectations as to what it can and cannot accomplish. This paper evaluates the role...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarrett, Daniel, Stride, Eleanor, Vallis, Katherine, Gooding, Mark J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31112393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190001
_version_ 1783449029136351232
author Jarrett, Daniel
Stride, Eleanor
Vallis, Katherine
Gooding, Mark J.
author_facet Jarrett, Daniel
Stride, Eleanor
Vallis, Katherine
Gooding, Mark J.
author_sort Jarrett, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Machine learning approaches to problem-solving are growing rapidly within healthcare, and radiation oncology is no exception. With the burgeoning interest in machine learning comes the significant risk of misaligned expectations as to what it can and cannot accomplish. This paper evaluates the role of machine learning and the problems it solves within the context of current clinical challenges in radiation oncology. The role of learning algorithms within the workflow for external beam radiation therapy are surveyed, considering simulation imaging, multimodal fusion, image segmentation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery and adaptation. For each aspect, the clinical challenges faced, the learning algorithms proposed, and the successes and limitations of various approaches are analyzed. It is observed that machine learning has largely thrived on reproducibly mimicking conventional human-driven solutions with more efficiency and consistency. On the other hand, since algorithms are generally trained using expert opinion as ground truth, machine learning is of limited utility where problems or ground truths are not well-defined, or if suitable measures of correctness are not available. As a result, machines may excel at replicating, automating and standardizing human behaviour on manual chores, meanwhile the conceptual clinical challenges relating to definition, evaluation, and judgement remain in the realm of human intelligence and insight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6724618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67246182019-10-23 Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology Jarrett, Daniel Stride, Eleanor Vallis, Katherine Gooding, Mark J. Br J Radiol Review Article Machine learning approaches to problem-solving are growing rapidly within healthcare, and radiation oncology is no exception. With the burgeoning interest in machine learning comes the significant risk of misaligned expectations as to what it can and cannot accomplish. This paper evaluates the role of machine learning and the problems it solves within the context of current clinical challenges in radiation oncology. The role of learning algorithms within the workflow for external beam radiation therapy are surveyed, considering simulation imaging, multimodal fusion, image segmentation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery and adaptation. For each aspect, the clinical challenges faced, the learning algorithms proposed, and the successes and limitations of various approaches are analyzed. It is observed that machine learning has largely thrived on reproducibly mimicking conventional human-driven solutions with more efficiency and consistency. On the other hand, since algorithms are generally trained using expert opinion as ground truth, machine learning is of limited utility where problems or ground truths are not well-defined, or if suitable measures of correctness are not available. As a result, machines may excel at replicating, automating and standardizing human behaviour on manual chores, meanwhile the conceptual clinical challenges relating to definition, evaluation, and judgement remain in the realm of human intelligence and insight. The British Institute of Radiology. 2019-08 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6724618/ /pubmed/31112393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190001 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Jarrett, Daniel
Stride, Eleanor
Vallis, Katherine
Gooding, Mark J.
Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology
title Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology
title_full Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology
title_fullStr Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology
title_full_unstemmed Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology
title_short Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology
title_sort applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31112393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190001
work_keys_str_mv AT jarrettdaniel applicationsandlimitationsofmachinelearninginradiationoncology
AT strideeleanor applicationsandlimitationsofmachinelearninginradiationoncology
AT valliskatherine applicationsandlimitationsofmachinelearninginradiationoncology
AT goodingmarkj applicationsandlimitationsofmachinelearninginradiationoncology