Cargando…

Effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for cervical cancer on survival: A nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVES: Despite the ease of health care access and the waiver of copayments for cancer patients, treatment is delayed in a small proportion of Taiwanese patients diagnosed with cervical cancer. In this study, we explored the relationship between the time interval from diagnosis to treatment and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chao-Ping, Kung, Pei-Tseng, Wang, Yueh-Hsin, Tsai, Wen-Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31483834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221946
_version_ 1783449068001820672
author Chen, Chao-Ping
Kung, Pei-Tseng
Wang, Yueh-Hsin
Tsai, Wen-Chen
author_facet Chen, Chao-Ping
Kung, Pei-Tseng
Wang, Yueh-Hsin
Tsai, Wen-Chen
author_sort Chen, Chao-Ping
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Despite the ease of health care access and the waiver of copayments for cancer patients, treatment is delayed in a small proportion of Taiwanese patients diagnosed with cervical cancer. In this study, we explored the relationship between the time interval from diagnosis to treatment and survival in cervical cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective population-based observational study conducted between 2004 and 2010. In Taiwan, 12,020 patients were newly diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2010, and 9,693 patients (80.6%) were enrolled in our final analysis. RESULTS: Most of the patients received treatment within 90 days of diagnosis (n = 9,341, 96.37%). After adjustment for other variables, patients who received treatment between 90 and 180 days and >180 days after diagnosis had a 1.33 (95% CI: 1.02–1.72, P < 0.05) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.12–1.65, P < 0.05) times higher risk of death, respectively, than those who received treatment within 90 days. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the patients treated after 90 days from diagnosis had a lower overall survival rate than those treated within 90 days. In analysis stratifying the patients according to their initial tumor stage, namely stages I and II and stage III and IV, the time interval from diagnosis to treatment remained a significant prognosticator in those who received treatment >180 days after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: A longer interval between diagnosis and treatment is associated with poorer prognosis among cervical cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6726236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67262362019-09-16 Effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for cervical cancer on survival: A nationwide cohort study Chen, Chao-Ping Kung, Pei-Tseng Wang, Yueh-Hsin Tsai, Wen-Chen PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Despite the ease of health care access and the waiver of copayments for cancer patients, treatment is delayed in a small proportion of Taiwanese patients diagnosed with cervical cancer. In this study, we explored the relationship between the time interval from diagnosis to treatment and survival in cervical cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective population-based observational study conducted between 2004 and 2010. In Taiwan, 12,020 patients were newly diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2010, and 9,693 patients (80.6%) were enrolled in our final analysis. RESULTS: Most of the patients received treatment within 90 days of diagnosis (n = 9,341, 96.37%). After adjustment for other variables, patients who received treatment between 90 and 180 days and >180 days after diagnosis had a 1.33 (95% CI: 1.02–1.72, P < 0.05) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.12–1.65, P < 0.05) times higher risk of death, respectively, than those who received treatment within 90 days. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the patients treated after 90 days from diagnosis had a lower overall survival rate than those treated within 90 days. In analysis stratifying the patients according to their initial tumor stage, namely stages I and II and stage III and IV, the time interval from diagnosis to treatment remained a significant prognosticator in those who received treatment >180 days after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: A longer interval between diagnosis and treatment is associated with poorer prognosis among cervical cancer patients. Public Library of Science 2019-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6726236/ /pubmed/31483834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221946 Text en © 2019 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Chao-Ping
Kung, Pei-Tseng
Wang, Yueh-Hsin
Tsai, Wen-Chen
Effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for cervical cancer on survival: A nationwide cohort study
title Effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for cervical cancer on survival: A nationwide cohort study
title_full Effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for cervical cancer on survival: A nationwide cohort study
title_fullStr Effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for cervical cancer on survival: A nationwide cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for cervical cancer on survival: A nationwide cohort study
title_short Effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for cervical cancer on survival: A nationwide cohort study
title_sort effect of time interval from diagnosis to treatment for cervical cancer on survival: a nationwide cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31483834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221946
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchaoping effectoftimeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentforcervicalcanceronsurvivalanationwidecohortstudy
AT kungpeitseng effectoftimeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentforcervicalcanceronsurvivalanationwidecohortstudy
AT wangyuehhsin effectoftimeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentforcervicalcanceronsurvivalanationwidecohortstudy
AT tsaiwenchen effectoftimeintervalfromdiagnosistotreatmentforcervicalcanceronsurvivalanationwidecohortstudy