Cargando…

Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?

Similarity between targets and distracters is a key factor in generating distractibility, and exerts a large detrimental effect on aging. The present EEG study tested the role of a new stimulus dimension in generating distractibility in visual Working Memory (vWM), namely numerical similarity. In a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tagliabue, Chiara Francesca, Brignani, Debora, Mazza, Veronica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31483830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222027
_version_ 1783449069717291008
author Tagliabue, Chiara Francesca
Brignani, Debora
Mazza, Veronica
author_facet Tagliabue, Chiara Francesca
Brignani, Debora
Mazza, Veronica
author_sort Tagliabue, Chiara Francesca
collection PubMed
description Similarity between targets and distracters is a key factor in generating distractibility, and exerts a large detrimental effect on aging. The present EEG study tested the role of a new stimulus dimension in generating distractibility in visual Working Memory (vWM), namely numerical similarity. In a change detection paradigm a varying number of relevant and irrelevant stimuli were presented simultaneously in opposite hemifields. Behavioral results indicated that young participants outperformed older individuals; however, in both groups numerical similarity per se did not modulate performance. At the electrophysiological level, in young participants the Contralateral Delay Activity (CDA, a proxy for item maintenance in vWM) was modulated by the numerosity of the relevant items regardless of numerical similarity. In older participants, the CDA was modulated by target numerosity only in the same numerical condition, where the total number of (relevant and irrelevant) items increased with increasing target numerosities. No effect was present in the dissimilar numerical condition, where the total number of items did not vary substantially across target numerosity. This pattern was suggestive of an age-related effect of the total number of (relevant and irrelevant) items on vWM. The additional analyses on alpha-band lateralization measures support this interpretation by revealing that older adults lacked selective deployment of attentional and vWM resources towards the relevant hemifield. Overall, the results indicate that, while numerical similarity does not modulate distractibility, there is an age-related redistribution of vWM resources across the two visual fields, ultimately leading to a general decrease in task performance of older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6726243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67262432019-09-16 Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory? Tagliabue, Chiara Francesca Brignani, Debora Mazza, Veronica PLoS One Research Article Similarity between targets and distracters is a key factor in generating distractibility, and exerts a large detrimental effect on aging. The present EEG study tested the role of a new stimulus dimension in generating distractibility in visual Working Memory (vWM), namely numerical similarity. In a change detection paradigm a varying number of relevant and irrelevant stimuli were presented simultaneously in opposite hemifields. Behavioral results indicated that young participants outperformed older individuals; however, in both groups numerical similarity per se did not modulate performance. At the electrophysiological level, in young participants the Contralateral Delay Activity (CDA, a proxy for item maintenance in vWM) was modulated by the numerosity of the relevant items regardless of numerical similarity. In older participants, the CDA was modulated by target numerosity only in the same numerical condition, where the total number of (relevant and irrelevant) items increased with increasing target numerosities. No effect was present in the dissimilar numerical condition, where the total number of items did not vary substantially across target numerosity. This pattern was suggestive of an age-related effect of the total number of (relevant and irrelevant) items on vWM. The additional analyses on alpha-band lateralization measures support this interpretation by revealing that older adults lacked selective deployment of attentional and vWM resources towards the relevant hemifield. Overall, the results indicate that, while numerical similarity does not modulate distractibility, there is an age-related redistribution of vWM resources across the two visual fields, ultimately leading to a general decrease in task performance of older adults. Public Library of Science 2019-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6726243/ /pubmed/31483830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222027 Text en © 2019 Tagliabue et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tagliabue, Chiara Francesca
Brignani, Debora
Mazza, Veronica
Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?
title Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?
title_full Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?
title_fullStr Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?
title_full_unstemmed Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?
title_short Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?
title_sort does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31483830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222027
work_keys_str_mv AT tagliabuechiarafrancesca doesnumericalsimilarityalteragerelateddistractibilityinworkingmemory
AT brignanidebora doesnumericalsimilarityalteragerelateddistractibilityinworkingmemory
AT mazzaveronica doesnumericalsimilarityalteragerelateddistractibilityinworkingmemory