Cargando…

Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training

BACKGROUND: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains essential to improve the outcome of patients in sudden cardiorespiratory arrest. Feedback on performance is a crucial component of the learning processes associated with simulation and has been shown to improve CPR quality during s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sá-Couto, Carla, Ferreira, Ana Margarida, Almeida, Diana, Nicolau, Abel, Vieira-Marques, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31595234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000008
_version_ 1783449076522549248
author Sá-Couto, Carla
Ferreira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Diana
Nicolau, Abel
Vieira-Marques, Pedro
author_facet Sá-Couto, Carla
Ferreira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Diana
Nicolau, Abel
Vieira-Marques, Pedro
author_sort Sá-Couto, Carla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains essential to improve the outcome of patients in sudden cardiorespiratory arrest. Feedback on performance is a crucial component of the learning processes associated with simulation and has been shown to improve CPR quality during simulated cardiac arrest on mannequins. This study aims to evaluate skills acquisition using a new low-cost feedback device for CPR self-training when compared to standard training methods. METHODS: Thirty-nine pregraduated medical and biomedical engineering students were recruited for a longitudinal double-blinded randomized control study. For training Basic Life Support skills, the control group used a standard task-trainer and received feedback from an instructor. The intervention group used the same standard task-trainer, instrumented with the CPR Personal Trainer that provided automated performance feedback (with no instructor) on compression-related parameters. Students’ knowledge and skills were assessed before and after training, through a theoretical knowledge test and 2 minutes of CPR practical performance. RESULTS: The theoretical tests showed an improvement both in the intervention and in the control group. For each compression-related parameters (hands position, recoil, rate, and depth), significant increase in scores is observed, between the pre- and the post-test, in both groups. The intervention and control groups presented identical mean differences for the total score (0.72 vs 0.72), with no statistical difference (P = 0.754). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed tool proved to be effective in the acquisition of compression-related skills, with similar outcomes as the traditional instructor-based method, corroborating the hypothesis that a low-cost tool with feedback for CPR self-training can provide an alternative or a complementary extension to traditional training methods. The system can also be considered cost-efficient as it reduces the permanent presence of an instructor for the chest compressions training, promoting regular training outside formal training courses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6726303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67263032019-10-08 Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training Sá-Couto, Carla Ferreira, Ana Margarida Almeida, Diana Nicolau, Abel Vieira-Marques, Pedro Porto Biomed J Original Article BACKGROUND: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains essential to improve the outcome of patients in sudden cardiorespiratory arrest. Feedback on performance is a crucial component of the learning processes associated with simulation and has been shown to improve CPR quality during simulated cardiac arrest on mannequins. This study aims to evaluate skills acquisition using a new low-cost feedback device for CPR self-training when compared to standard training methods. METHODS: Thirty-nine pregraduated medical and biomedical engineering students were recruited for a longitudinal double-blinded randomized control study. For training Basic Life Support skills, the control group used a standard task-trainer and received feedback from an instructor. The intervention group used the same standard task-trainer, instrumented with the CPR Personal Trainer that provided automated performance feedback (with no instructor) on compression-related parameters. Students’ knowledge and skills were assessed before and after training, through a theoretical knowledge test and 2 minutes of CPR practical performance. RESULTS: The theoretical tests showed an improvement both in the intervention and in the control group. For each compression-related parameters (hands position, recoil, rate, and depth), significant increase in scores is observed, between the pre- and the post-test, in both groups. The intervention and control groups presented identical mean differences for the total score (0.72 vs 0.72), with no statistical difference (P = 0.754). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed tool proved to be effective in the acquisition of compression-related skills, with similar outcomes as the traditional instructor-based method, corroborating the hypothesis that a low-cost tool with feedback for CPR self-training can provide an alternative or a complementary extension to traditional training methods. The system can also be considered cost-efficient as it reduces the permanent presence of an instructor for the chest compressions training, promoting regular training outside formal training courses. 2018-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6726303/ /pubmed/31595234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000008 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of PBJ-Associação Porto Biomedical/Porto Biomedical Society. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Original Article
Sá-Couto, Carla
Ferreira, Ana Margarida
Almeida, Diana
Nicolau, Abel
Vieira-Marques, Pedro
Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training
title Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training
title_full Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training
title_fullStr Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training
title_short Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training
title_sort evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for cpr self-training
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31595234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000008
work_keys_str_mv AT sacoutocarla evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining
AT ferreiraanamargarida evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining
AT almeidadiana evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining
AT nicolauabel evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining
AT vieiramarquespedro evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining