Cargando…
Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training
BACKGROUND: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains essential to improve the outcome of patients in sudden cardiorespiratory arrest. Feedback on performance is a crucial component of the learning processes associated with simulation and has been shown to improve CPR quality during s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31595234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000008 |
_version_ | 1783449076522549248 |
---|---|
author | Sá-Couto, Carla Ferreira, Ana Margarida Almeida, Diana Nicolau, Abel Vieira-Marques, Pedro |
author_facet | Sá-Couto, Carla Ferreira, Ana Margarida Almeida, Diana Nicolau, Abel Vieira-Marques, Pedro |
author_sort | Sá-Couto, Carla |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains essential to improve the outcome of patients in sudden cardiorespiratory arrest. Feedback on performance is a crucial component of the learning processes associated with simulation and has been shown to improve CPR quality during simulated cardiac arrest on mannequins. This study aims to evaluate skills acquisition using a new low-cost feedback device for CPR self-training when compared to standard training methods. METHODS: Thirty-nine pregraduated medical and biomedical engineering students were recruited for a longitudinal double-blinded randomized control study. For training Basic Life Support skills, the control group used a standard task-trainer and received feedback from an instructor. The intervention group used the same standard task-trainer, instrumented with the CPR Personal Trainer that provided automated performance feedback (with no instructor) on compression-related parameters. Students’ knowledge and skills were assessed before and after training, through a theoretical knowledge test and 2 minutes of CPR practical performance. RESULTS: The theoretical tests showed an improvement both in the intervention and in the control group. For each compression-related parameters (hands position, recoil, rate, and depth), significant increase in scores is observed, between the pre- and the post-test, in both groups. The intervention and control groups presented identical mean differences for the total score (0.72 vs 0.72), with no statistical difference (P = 0.754). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed tool proved to be effective in the acquisition of compression-related skills, with similar outcomes as the traditional instructor-based method, corroborating the hypothesis that a low-cost tool with feedback for CPR self-training can provide an alternative or a complementary extension to traditional training methods. The system can also be considered cost-efficient as it reduces the permanent presence of an instructor for the chest compressions training, promoting regular training outside formal training courses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6726303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67263032019-10-08 Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training Sá-Couto, Carla Ferreira, Ana Margarida Almeida, Diana Nicolau, Abel Vieira-Marques, Pedro Porto Biomed J Original Article BACKGROUND: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains essential to improve the outcome of patients in sudden cardiorespiratory arrest. Feedback on performance is a crucial component of the learning processes associated with simulation and has been shown to improve CPR quality during simulated cardiac arrest on mannequins. This study aims to evaluate skills acquisition using a new low-cost feedback device for CPR self-training when compared to standard training methods. METHODS: Thirty-nine pregraduated medical and biomedical engineering students were recruited for a longitudinal double-blinded randomized control study. For training Basic Life Support skills, the control group used a standard task-trainer and received feedback from an instructor. The intervention group used the same standard task-trainer, instrumented with the CPR Personal Trainer that provided automated performance feedback (with no instructor) on compression-related parameters. Students’ knowledge and skills were assessed before and after training, through a theoretical knowledge test and 2 minutes of CPR practical performance. RESULTS: The theoretical tests showed an improvement both in the intervention and in the control group. For each compression-related parameters (hands position, recoil, rate, and depth), significant increase in scores is observed, between the pre- and the post-test, in both groups. The intervention and control groups presented identical mean differences for the total score (0.72 vs 0.72), with no statistical difference (P = 0.754). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed tool proved to be effective in the acquisition of compression-related skills, with similar outcomes as the traditional instructor-based method, corroborating the hypothesis that a low-cost tool with feedback for CPR self-training can provide an alternative or a complementary extension to traditional training methods. The system can also be considered cost-efficient as it reduces the permanent presence of an instructor for the chest compressions training, promoting regular training outside formal training courses. 2018-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6726303/ /pubmed/31595234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000008 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of PBJ-Associação Porto Biomedical/Porto Biomedical Society. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sá-Couto, Carla Ferreira, Ana Margarida Almeida, Diana Nicolau, Abel Vieira-Marques, Pedro Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training |
title | Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training |
title_full | Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training |
title_short | Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training |
title_sort | evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for cpr self-training |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31595234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sacoutocarla evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining AT ferreiraanamargarida evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining AT almeidadiana evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining AT nicolauabel evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining AT vieiramarquespedro evaluationofskillsacquisitionusinganewlowcosttoolforcprselftraining |