Cargando…

Optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal use of antiresorptive therapy in patients with metastatic cancer in terms of time to treatment initiation, switching strategy in case of skeletal-related event (SRE) or skeletal disease progression, and treatment efficacy beyond 2 years....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mjelstad, AnneMarthe, Zakariasson, Gustav, Valachis, Antonis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04676-6
_version_ 1783449117059448832
author Mjelstad, AnneMarthe
Zakariasson, Gustav
Valachis, Antonis
author_facet Mjelstad, AnneMarthe
Zakariasson, Gustav
Valachis, Antonis
author_sort Mjelstad, AnneMarthe
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal use of antiresorptive therapy in patients with metastatic cancer in terms of time to treatment initiation, switching strategy in case of skeletal-related event (SRE) or skeletal disease progression, and treatment efficacy beyond 2 years. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including consecutive cancer patients with bone metastases that have received antiresorptive treatment between 2009 and 2015. The outcomes of interest were the time to first and subsequent symptomatic skeletal event (SSE), the skeletal morbidity rate, and the incidence of antiresorptive therapy-specific adverse events depending on the research question. RESULTS: In total, 255 patients included in our study cohort. The time to treatment initiation (direct (n = 143 patients) vs. delayed (n = 87 patients) defined as > 3 months after diagnosis of bone metastases) was not found to influence the time to SSE in (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–1.34) with comparable toxicity. Switching strategy after first SRE or due to skeletal disease progression from bisphosphonates to denosumab was independently associated with longer time to SRE (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25–0.88, p value = 0.019) compared with continuation with the same bisphosphonate. Using the landmark approach at 24 months and including 121 patients that survived for more than 2 years, we found that treatment continuation beyond 2 years was associated with longer time to first SSE after 2 years (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis-generating results support a more individualized approach on antiresorptive treatment including the lack of detrimental effect when the treatment is delayed, the potential benefit of switching strategy after skeletal disease progression or SSE, and the benefit of continuing antiresorptive treatment beyond 2 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6726664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67266642019-09-17 Optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration Mjelstad, AnneMarthe Zakariasson, Gustav Valachis, Antonis Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal use of antiresorptive therapy in patients with metastatic cancer in terms of time to treatment initiation, switching strategy in case of skeletal-related event (SRE) or skeletal disease progression, and treatment efficacy beyond 2 years. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including consecutive cancer patients with bone metastases that have received antiresorptive treatment between 2009 and 2015. The outcomes of interest were the time to first and subsequent symptomatic skeletal event (SSE), the skeletal morbidity rate, and the incidence of antiresorptive therapy-specific adverse events depending on the research question. RESULTS: In total, 255 patients included in our study cohort. The time to treatment initiation (direct (n = 143 patients) vs. delayed (n = 87 patients) defined as > 3 months after diagnosis of bone metastases) was not found to influence the time to SSE in (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–1.34) with comparable toxicity. Switching strategy after first SRE or due to skeletal disease progression from bisphosphonates to denosumab was independently associated with longer time to SRE (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25–0.88, p value = 0.019) compared with continuation with the same bisphosphonate. Using the landmark approach at 24 months and including 121 patients that survived for more than 2 years, we found that treatment continuation beyond 2 years was associated with longer time to first SSE after 2 years (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis-generating results support a more individualized approach on antiresorptive treatment including the lack of detrimental effect when the treatment is delayed, the potential benefit of switching strategy after skeletal disease progression or SSE, and the benefit of continuing antiresorptive treatment beyond 2 years. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-02-13 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6726664/ /pubmed/30759277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04676-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mjelstad, AnneMarthe
Zakariasson, Gustav
Valachis, Antonis
Optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration
title Optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration
title_full Optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration
title_fullStr Optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration
title_short Optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration
title_sort optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04676-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mjelstadannemarthe optimizingantiresorptivetreatmentinpatientswithbonemetastasestimetoinitiationswitchingstrategiesandtreatmentduration
AT zakariassongustav optimizingantiresorptivetreatmentinpatientswithbonemetastasestimetoinitiationswitchingstrategiesandtreatmentduration
AT valachisantonis optimizingantiresorptivetreatmentinpatientswithbonemetastasestimetoinitiationswitchingstrategiesandtreatmentduration