Cargando…

Target-oriented motor imagery for grasping action: different characteristics of brain activation between kinesthetic and visual imagery

Motor imagery (MI) for target-oriented movements, which is a basis for functional activities of daily living, can be more appropriate than non-target-oriented MI as tasks to promote motor recovery or brain-computer interface (BCI) applications. This study aimed to explore different characteristics o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Woo Hyung, Kim, Eunkyung, Seo, Han Gil, Oh, Byung-Mo, Nam, Hyung Seok, Kim, Yoon Jae, Lee, Hyun Haeng, Kang, Min-Gu, Kim, Sungwan, Bang, Moon Suk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31484971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49254-2
_version_ 1783449146698498048
author Lee, Woo Hyung
Kim, Eunkyung
Seo, Han Gil
Oh, Byung-Mo
Nam, Hyung Seok
Kim, Yoon Jae
Lee, Hyun Haeng
Kang, Min-Gu
Kim, Sungwan
Bang, Moon Suk
author_facet Lee, Woo Hyung
Kim, Eunkyung
Seo, Han Gil
Oh, Byung-Mo
Nam, Hyung Seok
Kim, Yoon Jae
Lee, Hyun Haeng
Kang, Min-Gu
Kim, Sungwan
Bang, Moon Suk
author_sort Lee, Woo Hyung
collection PubMed
description Motor imagery (MI) for target-oriented movements, which is a basis for functional activities of daily living, can be more appropriate than non-target-oriented MI as tasks to promote motor recovery or brain-computer interface (BCI) applications. This study aimed to explore different characteristics of brain activation among target-oriented kinesthetic imagery (KI) and visual imagery (VI) in the first-person (VI-1) and third-person (VI-3) perspectives. Eighteen healthy volunteers were evaluated for MI ability, trained for the three types of target-oriented MIs, and scanned using 3 T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) under MI and perceptual control conditions, presented in a block design. Post-experimental questionnaires were administered after fMRI. Common brain regions activated during the three types of MI were the left premotor area and inferior parietal lobule, irrespective of the MI modalities or perspectives. Contrast analyses showed significantly increased brain activation only in the contrast of KI versus VI-1 and KI versus VI-3 for considerably extensive brain regions, including the supplementary motor area and insula. Neural activity in the orbitofrontal cortex and cerebellum during VI-1 and KI was significantly correlated with MI ability measured by mental chronometry and a self-reported questionnaire, respectively. These results can provide a basis in developing MI-based protocols for neurorehabilitation to improve motor recovery and BCI training in severely paralyzed individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6726765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67267652019-09-18 Target-oriented motor imagery for grasping action: different characteristics of brain activation between kinesthetic and visual imagery Lee, Woo Hyung Kim, Eunkyung Seo, Han Gil Oh, Byung-Mo Nam, Hyung Seok Kim, Yoon Jae Lee, Hyun Haeng Kang, Min-Gu Kim, Sungwan Bang, Moon Suk Sci Rep Article Motor imagery (MI) for target-oriented movements, which is a basis for functional activities of daily living, can be more appropriate than non-target-oriented MI as tasks to promote motor recovery or brain-computer interface (BCI) applications. This study aimed to explore different characteristics of brain activation among target-oriented kinesthetic imagery (KI) and visual imagery (VI) in the first-person (VI-1) and third-person (VI-3) perspectives. Eighteen healthy volunteers were evaluated for MI ability, trained for the three types of target-oriented MIs, and scanned using 3 T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) under MI and perceptual control conditions, presented in a block design. Post-experimental questionnaires were administered after fMRI. Common brain regions activated during the three types of MI were the left premotor area and inferior parietal lobule, irrespective of the MI modalities or perspectives. Contrast analyses showed significantly increased brain activation only in the contrast of KI versus VI-1 and KI versus VI-3 for considerably extensive brain regions, including the supplementary motor area and insula. Neural activity in the orbitofrontal cortex and cerebellum during VI-1 and KI was significantly correlated with MI ability measured by mental chronometry and a self-reported questionnaire, respectively. These results can provide a basis in developing MI-based protocols for neurorehabilitation to improve motor recovery and BCI training in severely paralyzed individuals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6726765/ /pubmed/31484971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49254-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Woo Hyung
Kim, Eunkyung
Seo, Han Gil
Oh, Byung-Mo
Nam, Hyung Seok
Kim, Yoon Jae
Lee, Hyun Haeng
Kang, Min-Gu
Kim, Sungwan
Bang, Moon Suk
Target-oriented motor imagery for grasping action: different characteristics of brain activation between kinesthetic and visual imagery
title Target-oriented motor imagery for grasping action: different characteristics of brain activation between kinesthetic and visual imagery
title_full Target-oriented motor imagery for grasping action: different characteristics of brain activation between kinesthetic and visual imagery
title_fullStr Target-oriented motor imagery for grasping action: different characteristics of brain activation between kinesthetic and visual imagery
title_full_unstemmed Target-oriented motor imagery for grasping action: different characteristics of brain activation between kinesthetic and visual imagery
title_short Target-oriented motor imagery for grasping action: different characteristics of brain activation between kinesthetic and visual imagery
title_sort target-oriented motor imagery for grasping action: different characteristics of brain activation between kinesthetic and visual imagery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31484971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49254-2
work_keys_str_mv AT leewoohyung targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery
AT kimeunkyung targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery
AT seohangil targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery
AT ohbyungmo targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery
AT namhyungseok targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery
AT kimyoonjae targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery
AT leehyunhaeng targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery
AT kangmingu targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery
AT kimsungwan targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery
AT bangmoonsuk targetorientedmotorimageryforgraspingactiondifferentcharacteristicsofbrainactivationbetweenkinestheticandvisualimagery