Cargando…

An in vivo study comparing efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND: Pain is an unpleasant sensation ranging from mild localized discomfort to agony and is one of the most commonly experienced symptoms in oral surgery. Usually, local anesthetic agents and analgesics are used for pain control in oral surgical procedures. Local anesthetic agents including l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Aditi, Shah, Sonal, Waknis, Pushkar, Aher, Sharvika, Bhujbal, Prathamesh, Vaswani, Vibha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501779
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.4.209
_version_ 1783449171521437696
author Saha, Aditi
Shah, Sonal
Waknis, Pushkar
Aher, Sharvika
Bhujbal, Prathamesh
Vaswani, Vibha
author_facet Saha, Aditi
Shah, Sonal
Waknis, Pushkar
Aher, Sharvika
Bhujbal, Prathamesh
Vaswani, Vibha
author_sort Saha, Aditi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain is an unpleasant sensation ranging from mild localized discomfort to agony and is one of the most commonly experienced symptoms in oral surgery. Usually, local anesthetic agents and analgesics are used for pain control in oral surgical procedures. Local anesthetic agents including lignocaine and bupivacaine are routinely used in varying concentrations. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infraorbital nerve block. METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing bilateral maxillary orthodontic extraction received 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 41) on one side and 0.25% bupivacaine (n = 41) on the other side at an interval of 7 d. The parameters evaluated for both the bupivacaine concentrations were onset of action, pain during procedure (visual analog scale score [VAS]), and duration of action. The results were noted, tabulated, and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The onset of action of 0.5% bupivacaine was quicker than that of 0.25% bupivacaine, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.306). No significant difference was found between the solutions for VAS scores (P = 0.221) scores and duration of action (P = 0.662). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in terms of onset of action, pain during procedure, and duration of action. The use of 0.25% bupivacaine is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6726887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67268872019-09-09 An in vivo study comparing efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia Saha, Aditi Shah, Sonal Waknis, Pushkar Aher, Sharvika Bhujbal, Prathamesh Vaswani, Vibha J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Pain is an unpleasant sensation ranging from mild localized discomfort to agony and is one of the most commonly experienced symptoms in oral surgery. Usually, local anesthetic agents and analgesics are used for pain control in oral surgical procedures. Local anesthetic agents including lignocaine and bupivacaine are routinely used in varying concentrations. The present study was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infraorbital nerve block. METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing bilateral maxillary orthodontic extraction received 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 41) on one side and 0.25% bupivacaine (n = 41) on the other side at an interval of 7 d. The parameters evaluated for both the bupivacaine concentrations were onset of action, pain during procedure (visual analog scale score [VAS]), and duration of action. The results were noted, tabulated, and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The onset of action of 0.5% bupivacaine was quicker than that of 0.25% bupivacaine, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.306). No significant difference was found between the solutions for VAS scores (P = 0.221) scores and duration of action (P = 0.662). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in terms of onset of action, pain during procedure, and duration of action. The use of 0.25% bupivacaine is recommended. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2019-08 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6726887/ /pubmed/31501779 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.4.209 Text en Copyright © 2019 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saha, Aditi
Shah, Sonal
Waknis, Pushkar
Aher, Sharvika
Bhujbal, Prathamesh
Vaswani, Vibha
An in vivo study comparing efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia
title An in vivo study comparing efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia
title_full An in vivo study comparing efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia
title_fullStr An in vivo study comparing efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia
title_full_unstemmed An in vivo study comparing efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia
title_short An in vivo study comparing efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia
title_sort in vivo study comparing efficacy of 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine in infraorbital nerve block for postoperative analgesia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6726887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501779
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.4.209
work_keys_str_mv AT sahaaditi aninvivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT shahsonal aninvivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT waknispushkar aninvivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT ahersharvika aninvivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT bhujbalprathamesh aninvivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT vaswanivibha aninvivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT sahaaditi invivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT shahsonal invivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT waknispushkar invivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT ahersharvika invivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT bhujbalprathamesh invivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia
AT vaswanivibha invivostudycomparingefficacyof025and05bupivacaineininfraorbitalnerveblockforpostoperativeanalgesia